| name | osint |
| description | Comprehensive company intelligence gathering using distributed OSINT system with parallel specialized agents |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Configuration
Read .jobops/config.json. If missing, stop with:
JOBOPS NOT CONFIGURED
Run /jobops:setup to initialize your workspace.
Use config.directories.<key> for all file paths in this skill.
Use config.preferences.cultural_profile if this skill generates resume-style content.
Use config.preferences.default_jurisdiction if this skill has jurisdiction-sensitive logic (crisis/legal skills accept --jurisdiction=<ISO-3166-2> to override).
Company-Intelligence Path Resolution
This skill writes to a per-company folder under
{config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/. Before dispatching
any sub-agent:
- Extract
{Company} from the job-posting frontmatter or from the explicit
argument (e.g., /jobops:osint Google).
- Compose the target folder:
{config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/.
- If the folder already exists, prompt the user:
- refresh — overwrite all per-agent files.
- append — keep existing files, write a new
summary_{YYYYMMDD}.md
alongside them (do not modify per-agent files in place).
- skip — exit without running.
- Sub-agents write to fixed filenames:
corporate.md, legal.md, leadership.md, compensation.md,
culture.md, market.md.
- Person-level reports from
osint-person land under
{Company}/people/{interviewer_name}.md.
- The aggregated synthesis lands at
{Company}/summary.md on refresh
or {Company}/summary_{YYYYMMDD}.md on append.
Mission Overview
Deploy 6 specialized OSINT agents simultaneously to conduct parallel intelligence gathering on {{ARG1}}:
- osint-corporate - Corporate structure, financials, strategic positioning
- osint-legal - Litigation history, regulatory compliance, legal risks
- osint-leadership - Executive backgrounds, leadership analysis
- osint-compensation - Salary benchmarking, benefits, total rewards
- osint-culture - Employee sentiment, workplace culture analysis
- osint-market - Industry analysis, competitive landscape
Operational Protocol
Phase 1: Parallel Agent Deployment
✓ Deploying 6 specialized intelligence agents for target analysis
Launch all 6 specialized OSINT agents simultaneously to maximize intelligence gathering efficiency. Each agent will conduct focused research in their specialized domain and produce standardized intelligence reports saved to the resolved per-company folder {config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/.
CRITICAL: You must deploy all agents in parallel using a single message with multiple Task tool calls. This ensures simultaneous execution rather than sequential processing.
FILE STORAGE REQUIREMENTS: Each specialized agent MUST save their complete intelligence report to {config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/ using the fixed filenames (the folder path encodes company identity; the calling skill handles refresh vs. append dating):
corporate.mdlegal.mdleadership.mdcompensation.mdculture.mdmarket.md
When dispatching each sub-agent, pass the fully resolved target path explicitly in the Task instruction so the sub-agent writes to the correct location.
YAML FRONT MATTER: Prepend each specialized report with:
---
company: {{ARG1}}
report_type: corporate|legal|leadership|compensation|culture|market
generated_by: /osint
generated_on: <ISO8601 timestamp>
output_type: osint_corporate|osint_legal|osint_leadership|osint_compensation|osint_culture|osint_market
status: final
version: 1.0
---
Set report_type to the appropriate domain and output_type to the matching osint_{report_type} (e.g. corporate → osint_corporate) — this is the filename-independent detection key downstream tooling trusts. Update timestamps and versioning on reruns.
Example deployment pattern:
Deploy all 6 OSINT agents simultaneously to research [COMPANY]:
- Corporate intelligence (structure, finances, strategy)
- Legal intelligence (litigation, regulatory, compliance)
- Leadership intelligence (executives, personnel, governance)
- Compensation intelligence (salaries, benefits, equity)
- Culture intelligence (employee sentiment, workplace environment)
- Market intelligence (industry analysis, competitive positioning)
Phase 2: Intelligence Synthesis & Integration
After receiving all 6 specialized intelligence reports, synthesize findings into a comprehensive Master Intelligence Report following the structure below. The Master Intelligence Report MUST be saved to {config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/summary.md on refresh, or {config.directories.company_intelligence}/{Company}/summary_{YYYYMMDD}.md on append.
Prepend the master report with:
---
company: {{ARG1}}
generated_by: /osint master
generated_on: <ISO8601 timestamp>
sources:
- corporate
- legal
- leadership
- compensation
- culture
- market
output_type: osint_summary
status: final
version: 1.0
---
Master Intelligence Report Format
# Master Intelligence Report: {{ARG1}}
**Report Date:** [Date]
**Intelligence Sources:** 6 Specialized OSINT Agents
**Classification:** Strategic Intelligence / Company Assessment
## Executive Intelligence Summary
### Critical Findings
- **Overall Risk Assessment**: [High/Medium/Low]
- **Investment/Employment Recommendation**: [Strong Positive/Positive/Neutral/Negative/Strong Negative]
- **Key Opportunities**: [Top 3 strategic opportunities]
- **Key Risks**: [Top 3 critical risk factors]
### Intelligence Confidence Level
- **Overall Confidence**: [High/Medium/Low] based on source quality and verification
- **Information Gaps**: [Areas requiring additional intelligence]
## Corporate Intelligence Summary
*[Synthesized from osint-corporate report]*
### Financial Health Assessment
- **Revenue Trend**: [Growth/Stable/Declining]
- **Financial Stability**: [Strong/Adequate/Concerning]
- **Strategic Position**: [Market leader/Strong competitor/Follower/Struggling]
### Key Corporate Findings
- [Top 3 corporate intelligence findings]
- [Critical business developments]
- [Strategic partnerships and positioning]
## Legal Intelligence Summary
*[Synthesized from osint-legal report]*
### Legal Risk Profile
- **Litigation Risk**: [High/Medium/Low]
- **Regulatory Compliance**: [Strong/Adequate/Concerning]
: [Number and materiality of active cases]
[Significant litigation or regulatory issues]
[Compliance track record]
[Legal risk factors for employment/business]
: [Exceptional/Strong/Adequate/Concerning]
: [Stable/Some turnover/High turnover]
: [Strong/Adequate/Weak]
[Executive backgrounds and track record]
[Leadership effectiveness and red flags]
[Succession planning and key person risks]
: [Above market/Competitive/Below market]
: [Comprehensive/Standard/Limited]
: [High/Medium/Low potential]
[Salary ranges and competitiveness]
[Benefits and perks highlights]
[Equity and bonus structures]
[Negotiation leverage assessment]
: [High/Medium/Low]
: [X.X/5.0 across platforms]
: [Excellent/Good/Fair/Poor]
[Employee satisfaction themes]
[Management quality feedback]
[Work-life balance and flexibility]
[Diversity and inclusion practices]
: [Growing/Stable/Declining]
: [Market leader/Strong/Follower/Weak]
: [High/Medium/Low]
[Industry trends and opportunities]
[Competitive advantages and threats]
[Market position and differentiation]
: [Specific risk description and potential impact]
: [Specific risk description and potential impact]
: [Specific risk description and potential impact]
[List of secondary risks with brief descriptions]
[List of minor risks for completeness]
: [Specific opportunity and strategic value]
: [Specific opportunity and strategic value]
: [Specific opportunity and strategic value]
[Additional opportunities worth considering]
: [Accept/Consider Carefully/Decline]
: [Areas of leverage and approach]
: [Issues requiring clarification in interviews]
: [Specific questions based on intelligence gathered]
: [Proceed/Proceed with Caution/Avoid]
: [Areas requiring additional investigation]
: [Strategies to address identified risks]
: [High/Medium/Low]
: [Company's key strengths to monitor]
: [Areas where company may be attacked]
[Where multiple intelligence domains confirm same findings]
[Where different domains show conflicting information]
[Areas where additional research is needed]
[High-priority areas needing additional research]
[Areas requiring ongoing intelligence updates]
[Factors to monitor over extended period]
[Sources with strong track record and verification]
[Sources with adequate verification]
[Sources requiring additional verification]
Links to full detailed reports from each specialized agent
Complete list of all intelligence sources consulted
Dates and sequence of intelligence gathering activities
Quality Standards
Intelligence Integration Requirements
- Cross-Reference Verification: Corroborate findings across multiple intelligence domains with source citations
- Contradiction Resolution: Address any conflicting intelligence between agents with source attribution
- Gap Identification: Clearly identify areas where intelligence is insufficient with explicit labeling
- Risk Prioritization: Rank risks by severity and probability with supporting evidence and sources
- Actionable Insights: Provide specific, actionable recommendations based on intelligence with clear source attribution
Report Quality Criteria
- Comprehensiveness: Cover all critical aspects of company assessment with complete source documentation
- Objectivity: Present balanced analysis without bias, clearly distinguishing facts from analysis
- Evidence-Based: Support all conclusions with specific intelligence sources including URLs where available
- Strategic Focus: Emphasize insights most relevant for decision-making with clear source provenance
- Professional Standards: Meet intelligence community standards for analysis with rigorous citation practices
MANDATORY SOURCE ATTRIBUTION REQUIREMENTS
- Direct Citations: All factual claims MUST include inline citations with source URLs where available
- Footnotes: Use numbered footnotes for detailed source information and methodology
- Inference Labels: Clearly mark inferred, calculated, or derived information as [INFERRED], [CALCULATED], or [DERIVED]
- Assumption Flags: Mark assumptions as [ASSUMPTION] with reasoning provided
- Confidence Indicators: Include confidence levels (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) for all major findings
- Source Quality Ratings: Rate each source as (HIGH RELIABILITY), (MEDIUM RELIABILITY), or (LOW RELIABILITY)
- Date Attribution: Include access/publication dates for all sources
- Missing Source Disclosure: Explicitly state when sources are unavailable or information is based on industry standards
Operational Security
Ethical Guidelines
- Use only publicly available information sources
- Respect privacy and legal boundaries
- Maintain objectivity and avoid speculation
- Provide source attribution for verification
- Flag limitations and confidence levels
Information Handling
- Classify intelligence appropriately
- Protect sources and methods
- Ensure accurate attribution
- Maintain audit trail of intelligence gathering
Mission Success Criteria
- Complete Coverage: All 6 intelligence domains researched thoroughly
- Parallel Execution: All agents deployed simultaneously for efficiency
- Quality Integration: Findings properly synthesized and cross-referenced
- Actionable Intelligence: Clear recommendations for decision-making
- Professional Standards: Report meets intelligence community quality standards
Execute this comprehensive intelligence operation with the thoroughness and professionalism of an elite intelligence organization.
