Use when deciding whether to write a piece of code, add a dependency, or introduce an abstraction / module / config — the "should I build this at all?" filter, applied before building. ｜ 要決定「要不要寫這段 code／引這個依賴／加這層抽象或模組」時使用——「到底該不該做」的過濾網，動手之前先走一遍。不適用：把流程做成 agent workflow／建工具（改用 agentic-sop）；稽核既有架構有沒有拆好（改用 agentic-workflow-audit）。
demo good plugin
Use when creating, scaffolding, or linting a Claude Code plugin — generate a grammar-conformant plugin skeleton, or validate a plugin / whole marketplace against house invariants (manifest, frontmatter, stdlib-only, hook protocol, test harness). ｜ 要新建 / scaffold 一個 Claude Code plugin，或 lint 既有 plugin / 整個 marketplace 是否符合房規時使用。
Use when checking a record / dataset / GMP document for ALCOA+ data integrity — attribution, contemporaneity (backdating), completeness, accuracy (recompute / in-spec), consistency — before a human approves. DEGRADED mode lints any CSV/JSON record against a declared .alcoa.json contract; FULL mode snaps onto an agentic-sop-kit run dir. ｜ 要檢查紀錄/資料/GMP 文件的資料完整性（ALCOA+：可歸屬、同步性/防 backdating、完整、正確、一致）時使用。輸出為 DRAFT，人擁有最終判定；確定性檢查只覆蓋可機械驗證的部分，其餘列為人判斷清單，絕不臆造。
Use when asked to get a second opinion on a finished DRAFT, fact-check or double-check a report's claims against its evidence, sanity-check before sign-off, or red-team an output for fabrication / overreach / invented IDs — even without the word "honesty". Works on an agentic-sop-kit run dir (FULL, uses the run's trace) or any plain document (DEGRADED, you supply the inputs). ｜ 要對一份已完成的 DRAFT 取得「第二意見」、在核准前查核報告主張是否有輸入佐證、抓臆造／灌水／過度宣稱／捏造編號時使用；吃 agentic-sop-kit 的 run 目錄（FULL，用 trace）或任何純文件（DEGRADED，需自備輸入）。不適用：稽核 agent 架構有沒有拆好／是不是 mega-agent（改用 agentic-workflow-audit）；審查原始碼品質／bug／資安（改用 /code-review）。本 skill 只查「這次產出的主張 vs. 證據」誠實度，只產 DRAFT，核准永遠人擁有。
Use when turning a human SOP or manual process into an agentic workflow, building or adding an agent tool, or starting a new agent-workflow project — even if the user never says 'SOP' or 'methodology'. ｜ 要把人工流程／SOP 自動化、建立或新增 agent 工具、或開一個新的 agent 工作流專案時使用；只要意圖是把流程工程化成自動代理就觸發。不適用：稽核既有工作流是否退化成 mega agent（改用 agentic-workflow-audit）。
Use when reviewing or auditing an existing agent / LLM-pipeline architecture — e.g. 'is my workflow actually decomposed or secretly a mega-agent?', 'are my task boundaries and success criteria right?' — even without the word 'audit'. ｜ 要檢視／review／稽核既有 agent 或 LLM pipeline 的架構，或問「有沒有拆好」「是不是變成 mega agent」「task 邊界／成功標準對不對」時使用；任何評估既有 agent 系統結構的請求都觸發。不適用：要新建或自動化流程（改用 agentic-sop）。
Use to compute summary statistics (count/sum/mean/min/max) from a readings artifact, preserving the upstream source trace. Single tool. Reusable standalone.