Route and coordinate an end-to-end design-award workflow across winner research, evidence-based evaluation, award matching, entry-text preparation, and final submission checking. Use when a user asks for a complete award plan, does not know which Design Judge…
Find and verify award-winning designs in the same or adjacent functional category through eight explicit relevance dimensions: problem and user, core function, sensing technology, intervention mechanism, physical form, use context and workflow, system…
Evaluate one design or a user-approved maturity-mapped batch through a transparent evidence-based rubric. Classify each work, score design quality and presentation, identify Critical risks, report evidence confidence, and optionally shortlist works within…
Shared support package for the Design Judge skill collection. Install it with design-award-search and design-award-match so those skills can read the canonical functional-design taxonomy and official award-source registry. Do not invoke it as a standalone…
Match a design project to supported design-award programs, tracks, and entry categories; apply structural eligibility gates; verify current official rules; compare published criteria and cautiously described winner trends; and output fit, evidence confidence,…
Extract evidence-grounded project facts from user-provided design attachments, identify missing information, and prepare the exact written fields required by supported design-award entry forms. Use when a user asks to prepare, draft, adapt, translate, or…
Audit a design-award submission package against the current official rules for a specific award cycle. Check required materials and technical constraints, cross-material facts and claims, rights and disclosure risks, and final submission readiness. Use when a…