| name | lead-triage |
| description | Prioritize and route leads; never use opaque scores. |
| metadata | {"short-description":"Prioritize and route leads transparently"} |
Lead Triage
Outcome
A reviewable lead queue with reasons, duplicates, missing evidence, and recommended ownership.
CRM-neutral operating contract
- Discover available CRM, communication, calendar, knowledge, and file capabilities before choosing a retrieval plan. If no live CRM is available, use user-supplied exports when that still satisfies the request; never imply a live write is possible.
- Map records by meaning, not vendor labels: organization, person, lead, opportunity, activity, product, service record, user or team, and knowledge item. Inspect schemas and custom fields, preserve native IDs, stages, currencies, timezones, and fiscal periods.
- Keep observed facts, derived conclusions, and missing information distinct. Anchor consequential claims to record IDs, fields, timestamps, or named sources, and state access or freshness limits.
- Start read-only. Before creating, updating, assigning, sending, or scheduling, show the exact proposed action and obtain confirmation unless the current request already authorized that exact mutation.
- Obey connected-system permissions, resolve ambiguous records or people instead of guessing, check for duplicates before creation, and report partial failures without repeated retries.
Workflow
- Resolve the user, target records, requested scope, reporting window, timezone, and business objective. Ask only for missing details that materially change the result.
- Retrieve the minimum authorized evidence needed from the following inputs: Lead records, source, consent and suppression status, engagement, fit attributes, territory, existing people and accounts, routing rules, ownership, and capacity.
- Normalize relevant entities and fields while retaining native record identifiers and source timestamps.
- Apply the analysis rules below. When evidence conflicts, show the conflict rather than averaging it away.
- Deliver the required output in a compact form suited to the scope. Put urgent or decision-relevant items first.
Analysis rules
- Check eligibility, suppression, duplicates, existing account ownership, and active opportunities before prioritization.
- Apply the organization's configured scoring and service-level rules when available; otherwise propose transparent factors rather than inventing cutoffs.
- Separate fit, intent, urgency, and data quality so one signal does not dominate silently.
- Explain routing conflicts, stale leads, and uncertain matches.
Required output
- Priority queue
- Reason codes and evidence
- Duplicate or ownership conflicts
- Recommended route and timing
- Exceptions needing human review
Actions and boundaries
Assignment, conversion, disqualification, or outreach requires explicit confirmation of the affected records.