Exécutez n'importe quel Skill dans Manus
en un clic

Exécutez n'importe quel Skill dans Manus en un clic

Commencer

plan-execution-tdd

Étoiles6

Forks0

Mis à jour3 juin 2026 à 05:45

Supplementary TDD protocol injected into execution prompts when testCommand is configured

Installation

Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.

Exécuter dans Manus

Source

shipshitdev

shipshitdev/shipcode

Ouvrir le dépôt GitHub Voir les dépôts du créateur

Téléchargement

Exécuter dans Manus

Métiers associésSOC

Basé sur la classification professionnelle SOC

Analystes en assurance qualité des logiciels et testeursProfessions informatiques et mathématiques·SOC 15-1253

SKILL.md

readonly

name	plan-execution-tdd
description	Supplementary TDD protocol injected into execution prompts when testCommand is configured

<testing_protocol> When implementing changes, follow the test-driven development cycle for every behavioral change:

RED — Write a failing test first.
- The test must fail because the feature does not exist yet, not because of a syntax error or import problem.
- Run the test. Confirm it fails. If it passes, your test is wrong — it does not actually verify the new behavior.
- Keep the failure output concise and reviewer-useful. If the failure exposes an unexpected plan gap, record it in implementation-notes.md.
GREEN — Write the minimum code to make the test pass.
- Do not write more than the test demands. Resist the urge to generalize.
- Run the test again. Confirm it passes.
REFACTOR — Clean up while tests stay green.
- Extract shared setup, rename for clarity, remove duplication.
- Run the full relevant test file after each refactor step.

Bug fixes use the Prove-It Pattern:

Write a test that reproduces the bug (it must fail).
Confirm the test fails for the right reason.
Fix the code.
Confirm the test passes.
Run the broader test suite to check for regressions.

Hard limits:

Never write more than 100 lines of implementation code without running tests.
If a test is flaky (passes sometimes, fails sometimes), investigate immediately — do not skip it.
If the plan's acceptance criteria include tests, those tests must exist and pass before you commit.
Passing tests are not enough. Before committing, confirm the tests exercise user-visible or system-visible behavior named in the plan, not private implementation details.
If tests fail twice for the same root cause and the fix would exceed the approved plan, stop and hand off the exact command, failure summary, and suspected plan gap in implementation-notes.md. </testing_protocol>

Plus depuis ce dépôt

même dépôt

plan-generation

shipshitdev/shipcode

Planner skill — turn a user task into a precise, atomic, verifiable ShipCodePlan

2026-07-146

security-expert

shipshitdev/shipcode

Expert in application security, OWASP Top 10, authentication, authorization, data protection, and security best practices for React, Next.js, and NestJS applications. Use when implementing authentication or authorization, reviewing code for vulnerabilities, handling sensitive data, or implementing encryption or hashing.

2026-07-116

biome-validator

shipshitdev/shipcode

Validate Biome 2.3+ configuration and detect outdated patterns. Ensures proper schema version, domains, assists, and recommended rules. Use before any linting work or when auditing existing projects.

2026-07-106

bun-validator

shipshitdev/shipcode

Validate Bun workspace configuration and detect common monorepo issues. Ensures proper workspace setup, dependency catalogs, isolated installs, and Bun 1.3+ best practices. Use when setting up a Bun monorepo, before adding workspace dependencies, auditing an existing Bun workspace, or validating package.json in CI.

2026-07-106

component-library

shipshitdev/shipcode

Expert React/Next.js component architect specializing in creating consistent, reusable, and maintainable components for monorepo projects. Use when creating or refactoring UI components, reviewing component architecture, or setting up shared component patterns in a monorepo.

2026-07-106

prompt-engineering

shipshitdev/shipcode

Expert guide on prompt engineering patterns, best practices, and optimization techniques. Use when user wants to improve prompts, learn prompting strategies, debug agent behavior, or design content generation prompts.

2026-07-106

name	plan-execution-tdd
description	Supplementary TDD protocol injected into execution prompts when testCommand is configured

<testing_protocol> When implementing changes, follow the test-driven development cycle for every behavioral change:

RED — Write a failing test first.
- The test must fail because the feature does not exist yet, not because of a syntax error or import problem.
- Run the test. Confirm it fails. If it passes, your test is wrong — it does not actually verify the new behavior.
- Keep the failure output concise and reviewer-useful. If the failure exposes an unexpected plan gap, record it in implementation-notes.md.
GREEN — Write the minimum code to make the test pass.
- Do not write more than the test demands. Resist the urge to generalize.
- Run the test again. Confirm it passes.
REFACTOR — Clean up while tests stay green.
- Extract shared setup, rename for clarity, remove duplication.
- Run the full relevant test file after each refactor step.

Bug fixes use the Prove-It Pattern:

Write a test that reproduces the bug (it must fail).
Confirm the test fails for the right reason.
Fix the code.
Confirm the test passes.
Run the broader test suite to check for regressions.

Hard limits:

Never write more than 100 lines of implementation code without running tests.
If a test is flaky (passes sometimes, fails sometimes), investigate immediately — do not skip it.
If the plan's acceptance criteria include tests, those tests must exist and pass before you commit.
Passing tests are not enough. Before committing, confirm the tests exercise user-visible or system-visible behavior named in the plan, not private implementation details.
If tests fail twice for the same root cause and the fix would exceed the approved plan, stop and hand off the exact command, failure summary, and suspected plan gap in implementation-notes.md. </testing_protocol>