Skip to main content

architecture

Manage tech stack and architecture decisions

Aller à l'installation

Informations de source

Dépôt
SmidigStorm/storm-claude-marketplace
Dernière activité de la source
31 janvier 2026 à 11:06
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
5
Forks
0

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Explorateur de fichiers
2 fichiers

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
architecture
description
Manage tech stack and architecture decisions
# Architecture Manage the project's tech stack and architecture decisions. ## Instructions Ask the user what they want to do: 1. **Update tech stack** - Add or modify technologies in `docs/strategy/tech-stack.md` 2. **New decision** - Create an Architecture Decision Record in `docs/strategy/architecture/` 3. **Review decisions** - List existing ADRs and check if any need updating ### Option 1: Update Tech Stack 1. Check if `docs/strategy/tech-stack.md` exists 2. If it exists, read it and ask what to add/change 3. If it doesn't exist, gather the current tech stack through conversation 4. Update or create the file Tech stack document should cover: - **Languages** - Programming languages used - **Frameworks** - Core frameworks - **Infrastructure** - Hosting, CI/CD, etc. - **Data** - Databases, caching, etc. - **Key Libraries** - Important dependencies ### Option 2: New Decision Create a new ADR in `docs/strategy/architecture/`. Use numbered filenames like `001-title.md`. 1. Check existing ADRs to determine the next number 2. Ask the user about: - **Title**: Short name for the decision - **Context**: Why are we making this decision? What's the situation? - **Decision**: What did we decide? - **Consequences**: What does this mean going forward? (good and bad) 3. Create the ADR with status "accepted" ADR format: ```markdown # [NUMBER]. [TITLE] **Status**: accepted ## Context [Why we're making this decision] ## Decision [What we decided] ## Consequences [What this means - both positive and negative] ``` ### Option 3: Review Decisions 1. List all ADRs in `docs/strategy/architecture/` 2. Show a summary of each (title + status) 3. Ask if any decisions need to be revisited 4. If yes, update the status (deprecated, superseded) and optionally create a new ADR ## Output Locations - Tech stack: `docs/strategy/tech-stack.md` - ADRs: `docs/strategy/architecture/NNN-title.md` ## Notes - Keep ADRs concise - capture the essence, not every detail - ADRs are immutable once accepted - create new ones to supersede old decisions - Tech stack should reflect what's actually in use, not aspirational ## Resources - For detailed ADR guidance, see [adr-guide.md](adr-guide.md)
Voir sur GitHub