Skip to main content

write-memory

Use at the end of non-trivial work in an opted-in .memobox project only when the result passes the durable-memory worthiness gate, or when the user explicitly asks to save a memory.

Informations de source

Dépôt
study8677/memobox
Dernière activité de la source
10 juillet 2026 à 11:37
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
2
Forks
1

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Explorateur de fichiers
2 fichiers

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
write-memory
description
Use at the end of non-trivial work in an opted-in .memobox project only when the result passes the durable-memory worthiness gate, or when the user explicitly asks to save a memory.
# Write MemoBox Memory Write a Memory Mail only for a durable, verified outcome. Store decisions and reusable evidence, not a transcript dump. An existing `.memobox` directory is the opt-in signal; do not create one automatically. ## Worthiness Gate Write only when at least one of these is true: - A durable decision, constraint, or project convention was established. - A non-obvious cause was found and the fix was verified. - Exact files, commands, URLs, or other artifacts will save meaningful investigation later. - An unresolved risk or next action must survive the current session. - The result is a useful cross-session or cross-agent handoff. Write nothing when the task was a simple lookup, formatting or mechanical edit, contains sensitive material that cannot be safely excluded, produced only speculation, duplicates an existing memory, or has no likely persistent value. Do not create a record merely because the task ended or merely to log that another memory was opened. ## Steps 1. Keep one coherent durable outcome per record; most tasks should write zero or one record. 2. Create a concise subject and a one-sentence summary useful from the index alone. 3. Include verified context in `--body`; put decisions, artifacts, risks, and next actions in their structured flags. When recency matters, set `--last-verified-at`; set `--valid-until` only when there is a real review horizon. 4. If this result replaces an older project memory, add one `--supersedes <id>` per replaced record. MemoBox will link the new record and mark those exact sources `stale`; review the old bodies before doing this. 5. Add one `--source-ref "memobox:<id>"` for each previously stored project memory that materially influenced this result, or `--source-ref "memobox-global:<id>"` for global memory. Do not cite ids that were merely opened. 6. Confirm `command -v memobox`. In a MemoBox source checkout only, use `PYTHONPATH=src python3 -m memobox.cli` as the fallback. 7. Run, omitting empty flags: ```bash memobox --store .memobox write \ --subject "<short title>" \ --summary "<index-level summary>" \ --project "<project>" \ --team "<team>" \ --role "<role>" \ --tags "<comma,separated,tags>" \ --body "<verified context and result>" \ --decision "<decision worth preserving>" \ --last-verified-at "<ISO-8601 date or timezone-aware datetime>" \ --valid-until "<ISO-8601 review horizon>" \ --supersedes "<replaced-memory-id>" \ --artifact "file:<exact path or evidence URI>" \ --risk "<remaining caveat>" \ --next-action "<follow-up if any>" \ --source-ref "memobox:<reused-memory-id>" \ --json ``` 8. Confirm the returned id exists in `.memobox/mails/<id>.json`; if `--supersedes` was used, confirm the exact old records are now `stale` in the index. Never store secrets, credentials, private tokens, personal data, confidential raw content, or unredacted logs. Use `--raw-trace-file` only when the user explicitly wants the evidence retained and it has been checked for sensitive data. `PreCompact(auto)` is a safety net, not the primary write path. Its `needs_review` checkpoints may be partial and should not replace a deliberate, structured end-of-task Memory Mail.
Voir sur GitHub