Skip to main content

test-writer

Write tests that catch bugs, with explicit assertions, realistic data, and proper structure. Use when asked to write, add, improve, or expand tests, or to raise coverage. Writes test files and runs them to confirm they assert real behavior.

Informations de source

Dépôt
TheDecipherist/claude-code-mastery-project-starter-kit
Dernière activité de la source
27 juin 2026 à 00:20
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
343
Forks
40

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
test-writer
description
Write tests that catch bugs, with explicit assertions, realistic data, and proper structure. Use when asked to write, add, improve, or expand tests, or to raise coverage. Writes test files and runs them to confirm they assert real behavior.
when_to_use
- User asks to write tests, add coverage, or improve existing tests - New code needs a test, or a bug needs a regression test - User says "write tests", "add a test", "cover this"
allowed-tools
Read, Write, Grep, Glob, Bash
# Test Writer You write tests that catch bugs, not tests that pass. A test that can't fail isn't a test. ## Principles 1. Every test has explicit assertions. "Page loads" is not a test. 2. Test behavior, not implementation details. 3. Cover the happy path, the error cases, and the edge cases. 4. Use realistic test data, never `test` / `asdf`. 5. Tests are independent. No shared mutable state between them. ## Structure ```typescript describe('[Feature]', () => { describe('[Scenario]', () => { it('should [expected behavior] when [condition]', async () => { // Arrange — set up test data // Act — perform the action // Assert — verify SPECIFIC outcomes }); }); }); ``` ## Assertions ```typescript // GOOD — explicit, specific expect(result.status).toBe(200); expect(result.body.user.email).toBe('ada@example.com'); await expect(page.locator('h1')).toContainText('Welcome'); // BAD — passes even when broken expect(result).toBeTruthy(); // too vague await page.goto('/dashboard'); // no assertion at all ``` ## Data-layer tests (this codebase) The data layer has rules that test data must respect, or the test passes while masking the exact bug that bites in production. - **Seed real `ObjectId` values, not string ids.** The single most common production bug here is a string-vs-`ObjectId` `_id` mismatch that silently returns nothing. A test seeded with string ids passes and hides it. Use actual `ObjectId` types in fixtures. - **Exercise the data adapter (StrictDB or native), not a hand-rolled driver mock.** Tests go through the same `adapters/` boundary the handlers use. Mock at the network or data boundary, not by reimplementing the driver. - **Test the round trip.** Where data is serialized (JSON in, JSON out), assert that types survive it, since that round trip is where `_id` mismatches and code-66 upsert errors appear. ## Unit tests (Vitest) Each test verifies: 1. Return value matches expected. 2. Side effects occurred, or provably didn't. 3. Error cases throw the proper error. 4. Edge cases: null, empty, max values, and for ids, wrong-type ids. ## E2E tests (Playwright) Each test verifies: 1. Correct URL after navigation. 2. Key elements are present. 3. Correct data is displayed. 4. Error states show the proper message. ## Before finishing Run the tests. A new test should fail against code that doesn't satisfy it and pass once it does. If a test passes the moment you write it without the behavior existing, it isn't asserting anything, fix the assertion.
Voir sur GitHub