Skip to main content

security-audit

Audit code and dependencies for security vulnerabilities. Use when reviewing PRs, checking dependencies, preparing for deployment, or when user mentions security, vulnerabilities, or audit.

Informations de source

Dépôt
TheDecipherist/claude-code-mastery
Dernière activité de la source
14 janvier 2026 à 19:04
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
550
Forks
48

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
security-audit
description
Audit code and dependencies for security vulnerabilities. Use when reviewing PRs, checking dependencies, preparing for deployment, or when user mentions security, vulnerabilities, or audit.
# Security Audit Skill Perform comprehensive security audits on codebases to identify vulnerabilities before they reach production. ## When to Use This Skill - User mentions "security", "audit", "vulnerability", "CVE" - Before deployment commands - During PR reviews - User asks about dependencies - Periodic security checks ## Audit Checklist ### 1. Secrets Exposure **Check for hardcoded secrets:** ```bash # Search for common secret patterns grep -rn "API_KEY\|SECRET\|TOKEN\|PASSWORD" --include="*.{js,ts,py,go,rb,java}" . grep -rn "sk-\|pk_\|api_\|secret_" --include="*.{js,ts,py,go,rb,java}" . ``` **Verify .gitignore:** ```bash # Ensure sensitive files are ignored cat .gitignore | grep -E "\.env|secret|credential|\.pem|\.key" ``` **Check git history for leaked secrets:** ```bash # Search recent commits (requires git-secrets or truffleHog) git log -p --all -S "API_KEY" --since="30 days ago" ``` ✅ Pass criteria: - No hardcoded API keys, tokens, or passwords - `.env` files in `.gitignore` - No secrets in git history ### 2. Dependency Vulnerabilities **Node.js:** ```bash npm audit # or yarn audit # or pnpm audit ``` **Python:** ```bash pip-audit # or safety check ``` **Go:** ```bash govulncheck ./... ``` **Rust:** ```bash cargo audit ``` ✅ Pass criteria: - No critical vulnerabilities - No high vulnerabilities > 30 days old - Dependencies updated within last 90 days ### 3. Input Validation **Check for:** - User inputs sanitized before use - SQL queries use parameterized statements - File paths validated and sandboxed - HTML content escaped before rendering - Command injection prevention **Common vulnerable patterns:** ```javascript // BAD: SQL injection db.query(`SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ${userId}`) // GOOD: Parameterized query db.query('SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = ?', [userId]) ``` ```python # BAD: Command injection os.system(f"convert {user_file}") # GOOD: Use subprocess with list subprocess.run(["convert", user_file], check=True) ``` ### 4. Authentication & Authorization **Check for:** - Passwords hashed with bcrypt/argon2 (not MD5/SHA1) - Session tokens are cryptographically random - Sessions expire appropriately - CSRF protection on state-changing endpoints - Rate limiting on auth endpoints - Account lockout after failed attempts **Look for:** ```javascript // BAD: Weak hashing crypto.createHash('md5').update(password) // GOOD: Bcrypt bcrypt.hash(password, 12) ``` ### 5. HTTPS & Transport Security **Check for:** - HTTPS enforced (HSTS header) - Secure cookie flags (`Secure`, `HttpOnly`, `SameSite`) - No mixed content warnings - TLS 1.2+ required ### 6. Error Handling **Check for:** - Stack traces not exposed in production - Generic error messages for users - Detailed errors only in logs - Sensitive data not in error messages ```javascript // BAD: Exposes internals res.status(500).send({ error: err.stack }) // GOOD: Generic message res.status(500).send({ error: 'An unexpected error occurred' }) ``` ### 7. File Upload Security If file uploads exist: - Validate file type server-side (not just extension) - Limit file size - Scan for malware - Store outside webroot - Rename uploaded files ### 8. API Security - Authentication required on all sensitive endpoints - Authorization checks per resource - Rate limiting implemented - CORS configured restrictively - API versioning in place ## Severity Levels | Level | Description | Action Required | |-------|-------------|-----------------| | 🔴 Critical | Actively exploitable | Block deployment | | 🟠 High | Exploitable with effort | Fix within 7 days | | 🟡 Medium | Requires conditions | Fix within 30 days | | 🟢 Low | Minimal impact | Fix when convenient | ## Output Format ```markdown ## Security Audit Results **Project:** [name] **Date:** [date] **Auditor:** Claude (automated) ### Summary | Severity | Count | |----------|-------| | 🔴 Critical | 0 | | 🟠 High | 1 | | 🟡 Medium | 2 | | 🟢 Low | 3 | ### Findings #### 1. [🟠 High] Hardcoded API Key **Location:** `src/config.js:15` **Description:** API key for payment provider is hardcoded **Risk:** If source code is leaked, attackers gain API access **Recommendation:** Move to environment variable ```diff - const STRIPE_KEY = 'sk_live_abc123...' + const STRIPE_KEY = process.env.STRIPE_SECRET_KEY ``` #### 2. [🟡 Medium] Missing Rate Limiting **Location:** `src/routes/auth.js` **Description:** Login endpoint has no rate limiting **Risk:** Enables brute force attacks **Recommendation:** Add rate limiting middleware ### Recommendations 1. [ ] Fix critical and high issues before next deployment 2. [ ] Schedule medium issues for next sprint 3. [ ] Add low issues to backlog 4. [ ] Re-run audit after fixes ``` ## Commands to Run After completing the audit, provide the user with: 1. Summary of findings 2. Prioritized fix list 3. Commands to address each issue 4. Timeline recommendation
Voir sur GitHub