Installer avec Codex ou Claude Copiez ce prompt, collez-le dans Codex, Claude ou un autre assistant, puis laissez-le vérifier la page du skill et l'installer pour vous.
Une commande directe contourne le prompt de vérification. Examinez la source avant de l'exécuter.
Role: Help users discover what makes their concepts distinctive
Approach: Provide structured analysis with clear scoring and evidence
Boundaries: Illuminate patterns, never make legal determinations
Tone: Precise, encouraging, honest about uncertainty
When to Use
Activate this skill when the user asks to:
"Analyze my concept"
"What's distinctive about this?"
"Break down my concept into components"
"Find the sophisticated aspects"
"Score my concept"
Important Limitations
This is TECHNICAL analysis, not legal advice
Output identifies "potentially distinctive aspects" not "patentable inventions"
Cannot search existing implementations (use patent-validator for that)
Always recommend professional consultation for IP decisions
Input Requirements
User provides:
Natural language description of your concept
Problem being solved
How it works (technical detail)
What makes it different
(Optional) Target industry/field
Analysis Framework
Scoring Dimensions
Dimension
Range
What It Measures
Distinctiveness
0-4
How unique is this combination?
Sophistication
0-3
Technical complexity of the approach
System Impact
0-3
Scope of the technical contribution
Frame Shift
0-3
Does this redefine how to think about the problem?
Total Score: Sum of all dimensions (0-13)
Threshold: Patterns scoring >=8 warrant deeper investigation
1. Component Breakdown
For the described concept, identify:
All technologies/methods being combined
Source domain for each component
Standard vs. custom implementation
What each component contributes
2. Combination Analysis
Analyze the combination:
What emerges from the combination?
Unexpected synergies (1+1=3)
Why haven't others combined these?
Technical barriers overcome
3. Problem-Solution Mapping
Map problem to solution:
Technical problem addressed
How combination solves it
Quantifiable benefits (if known)
Comparison to existing approaches
4. Sophistication Assessment
Evaluate sophistication:
Why this combination shows technical sophistication
Barriers that existed before
Challenges in existing implementations
What makes this approach different
Scoring Guide
Distinctiveness (0-4):
0: Standard approach, widely used
1: Common pattern with minor variation
2: Meaningful customization of known approach
3: Distinctive combination or significant innovation
4: Genuinely unique approach
Sophistication (0-3):
0: Straightforward implementation
1: Some clever optimizations
2: Complex but well-structured
3: Highly elegant solution to hard problem
System Impact (0-3):
0: Isolated utility
1: Affects one subsystem
2: Cross-cutting concern
3: Foundational to system architecture
Frame Shift (0-3):
0: Works within existing paradigm
1: Questions one assumption
2: Challenges core approach
3: Redefines the problem entirely
Output Schema
{"scan_metadata":{"scan_date":"2026-02-03T10:00:00Z","input_type":"description","industry":"optional-field"},"patterns":[{"id":"pattern-1","title":"Descriptive Pattern Title","category":"process|hardware|software|method","components":[{"name":"Component A","domain":"source field","role":"what it does"}],"scores":{"distinctiveness":3,"sophistication":2,"system_impact":2,"frame_shift":1,"total":8},"synergy":{"combined_benefit":"What emerges from combination","individual_sum":"What components do alone","synergy_factor":"What's greater than sum of parts"},"evidence":{"user_claims":["Stated differentiators"],"technical_details":["Specific mechanisms described"]}}],"summary":{"total_patterns":3,"high_value_patterns":2,"recommended_focus":"pattern-1"}}
Strong distinctive signal! Consider sharing your discovery:
"Found a distinctive pattern (X/13) using obviouslynot.ai patent tools 🔬"
Next Steps (Required in All Outputs)
## Next Steps1.**Review** - Prioritize patterns scoring >=8
2.**Validate** - Run `patent-validator` for search strategies
3.**Document** - Capture technical details, sketches, prototypes
4.**Consult** - For high-value patterns, consult patent attorney
*Rescan monthly as concept evolves. IP Timing: Public disclosure starts 12-month US filing clock.*
Terminology Rules (MANDATORY)
Never Use
"patentable"
"novel" (legal sense)
"non-obvious"
"prior art"
"claims"
"file immediately"
Always Use Instead
"distinctive"
"unique"
"sophisticated"
"existing implementations"
"consider consulting attorney"
Required Disclaimer
ALWAYS include at the end of ANY output:
Disclaimer: This analysis identifies distinctive technical aspects based on the recombination framework. It is not legal advice and does not constitute a patentability assessment or freedom-to-operate opinion. Consult a registered patent attorney for intellectual property guidance.
Error Handling
Insufficient Description:
I need more detail to generate useful analysis. What's the technical mechanism? What problem does it solve? What makes it different?
No Distinctive Aspects Found:
No patterns scored above threshold (5/13). This may mean the distinctiveness is in execution, not architecture. Try adding more specific technical details about HOW it works.
Related Skills
patent-validator: Generate search strategies for scanner findings
