Skip to main content

slime-code-review-preferences

Use when reviewing or editing slime code, especially refactors around helper APIs, branch selection, argument validation, or recurring reviewer preferences about avoiding unnecessary wrappers and making control flow self-explanatory.

Informations de source

Dépôt
THUDM/slime
Dernière activité de la source
29 septembre 2026 à 09:35
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
8 632
Forks
1 310

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
slime-code-review-preferences
description
Use when reviewing or editing slime code, especially refactors around helper APIs, branch selection, argument validation, or recurring reviewer preferences about avoiding unnecessary wrappers and making control flow self-explanatory.
# Slime Code Review Preferences Apply these lightweight review heuristics when changing slime code. ## Prefer Direct APIs Over Thin Wrappers - Remove helper layers that only rename a call, format one path, or forward arguments without owning meaningful behavior. - Prefer calling the concrete reusable API directly, for example a `*_to_path` helper when the caller already knows the destination path. - Keep a wrapper only if it owns a real boundary: compatibility, validation, nontrivial error policy, lifecycle management, metrics/logging semantics, async/retry behavior, or cross-module ownership. - Avoid moving a redundant wrapper's body into another file just to preserve the wrapper shape. Inline the simple call at the natural ownership site. - When removing a wrapper, search for sibling wrappers and nearby helpers with `rg` and delete confirmed dead functions in the same pass. - Treat single-use convenience functions as suspicious when their only job is path formatting plus forwarding. Prefer the caller owning that one line. ## Make Branches Explain Themselves - Order conditionals by semantic precedence: special transport/lifecycle modes first, then explicit mode choices, then default paths. - Prefer predicates that fully describe the branch, such as `mode == "full" and transport == "disk"`, over a broad predicate followed by an assert that explains what the branch really meant. - Use asserts as invariants for impossible states after validation, not as a substitute for clear branch conditions. ## Keep Abstractions Honest - Add an abstraction only when it removes real duplication, hides fragile mechanics, or clarifies ownership. - When a review comment points out repeated indirection, look for a smaller public surface rather than adding another alias. - Preserve existing behavior intentionally. If cleanup changes error handling, logging, or failure visibility, call that out in the final response. ## Keep Runtime State Out of Args - Treat `args` as configuration. Do not add ad hoc `args._xxx` attributes to pass actor handles, caches, recovery progress, current versions, or other runtime state between components. Renaming these to public attributes does not fix the ownership problem. - Put live state on the component that owns its lifecycle. Pass dependencies explicitly, and use typed return values for startup plans or restoration results shared between components. - Avoid replacing scattered temporary fields with a generic `args.context` bag. Keep each state object's responsibility and lifetime clear. - Preserve existing custom hook signatures, call arguments, and return conventions when refactoring internal state. User implementations must not need new parameters merely to accommodate an internal cleanup.
Voir sur GitHub