Skip to main content

incident-response

Structured incident response: detect, communicate, mitigate, resolve, and prevent recurrence

Aller à l'installation

Informations de source

Dépôt
vignesh2027/AI-AGENT-SKILLS
Dernière activité de la source
13 mai 2026 à 19:03
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
1
Forks
0

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
incident-response
description
Structured incident response: detect, communicate, mitigate, resolve, and prevent recurrence
## Overview Incidents are inevitable. How you respond determines whether they are learning opportunities or recurring nightmares. This skill gives you a structured process from first alert to prevention of recurrence. ## When to Use - When an alert fires indicating user impact - When a deployment causes degraded service - When you discover a data issue in production - After any unplanned outage, even brief ## Process ### Phase 1: DETECT (0–5 minutes) **Step 1: Acknowledge the alert** Acknowledge in your alerting system within 5 minutes. This signals you're on it and stops duplicate escalations. **Step 2: Assess severity** - **P0** — Complete service outage, data loss, security breach. Page everyone. - **P1** — Significant degradation affecting many users. Page the team. - **P2** — Partial degradation, workaround exists. Handle during business hours. - **P3** — Minor issue, users unaffected or workaround obvious. Normal ticket. **Step 3: Declare the incident and open a channel** For P0/P1: open an incident channel (#incident-YYYY-MM-DD-brief-description). All communication goes there. Appoint an Incident Commander (IC). ### Phase 2: COMMUNICATE (5–15 minutes) **Step 4: Post a status update** Within 15 minutes of detection, post to the status page: "We are investigating reports of [symptom]. We will provide an update in 30 minutes." Do not wait until you have a fix. Users need to know you know. **Step 5: Brief stakeholders** Notify: on-call manager, customer-facing teams, affected customers (for P0/P1). Use the incident channel as the single source of truth. ### Phase 3: MITIGATE (15 minutes – resolution) **Step 6: Stop the bleeding first** Mitigation before diagnosis. Options: - Roll back the last deployment - Disable the feature flag - Scale up capacity - Redirect traffic away from the failing component Don't spend time diagnosing the root cause while users are impacted. Mitigate first. **Step 7: Diagnose** Once impact is reduced, find the root cause: - What changed recently? (Deployments, config changes, traffic spikes) - What do the metrics show? (Error rate, latency, saturation) - What do the logs show? (First error, error pattern, affected user IDs) - What do the traces show? (Where in the call chain is the failure?) **Step 8: Implement the fix** Implement the minimal fix. This is not the time for refactoring. ### Phase 4: RESOLVE (at mitigation/fix) **Step 9: Confirm resolution** Verify: error rate back to baseline, latency back to baseline, no new error types in logs, affected users can complete their tasks. **Step 10: Update status page** Post: "The issue has been resolved. Affected users can [action]. We will publish a post-mortem within 48 hours." ### Phase 5: LEARN (within 48 hours) **Step 11: Write the post-mortem** Structure: - **Summary**: what happened, duration, user impact - **Timeline**: minute-by-minute from first symptom to resolution - **Root cause**: the underlying cause (not just the immediate trigger) - **Contributing factors**: what made this worse or harder to detect - **What went well**: don't only document failures - **Action items**: specific tasks with owners and due dates **Step 12: Blameless post-mortem** Focus on systems and processes, not individuals. "The deployment pipeline allowed a bad config to reach production" not "Alice pushed bad config." ## Anti-Rationalizations **"We'll communicate once we have a fix"** Users need to know you know. An hour of silence is worse than an honest "we're investigating." **"We know the root cause — no need for a post-mortem"** Post-mortems are not just for finding root causes. They identify contributing factors, test your detection and response, and create shared understanding. Skip them and the same incident recurs. ## Verification Requirements - [ ] Incident acknowledged within 5 minutes of alert - [ ] Severity assessed and appropriate people notified - [ ] Status page updated within 15 minutes - [ ] Mitigation performed before full diagnosis - [ ] Resolution confirmed with metrics, not just a fix deployment - [ ] Post-mortem written within 48 hours - [ ] Action items have owners and due dates
Voir sur GitHub