Skip to main content

code-review

Review pull requests to code-graph-rag, a multi-language code graph parser. Focuses on graph-edge correctness in language parsers, cross-language consistency, and test fixtures that actually exercise the fix.

Aller à l'installation

Informations de source

Dépôt
vitali87/code-graph-rag
Dernière activité de la source
20 septembre 2026 à 23:44
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
5 164
Forks
682

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
code-review
description
Review pull requests to code-graph-rag, a multi-language code graph parser. Focuses on graph-edge correctness in language parsers, cross-language consistency, and test fixtures that actually exercise the fix.
# Reviewing code-graph-rag This repository parses source in many languages with tree-sitter and ingests the result into a code graph: nodes for modules, classes and functions, edges such as `CALLS`, `INSTANTIATES`, `DEFINES` and `IMPORTS`. Most defects that reach `main` are wrong or missing *edges* for a specific language construct, not crashes. Weight the review accordingly. ## Highest-value checks ### Graph-edge correctness - Does a new or changed construct produce every edge it should, and no edge it should not? A constructor call is the recurring example: it should record `INSTANTIATES` on the class *and* `CALLS` on the constructor. - Check the qualified name the edge is attached to. Name-mangling bugs recur here: duplicate-suffixed classes, verbatim identifiers (`@class` in C#), named constructors, generics (`Box<int>()`) and marker-stripping passes have each produced an edge pointing at a name that no node has. - Resolution must respect scope. A local variable shadowing a type means the receiver is not a construction; flag resolution that matches on bare name without checking what is actually in scope. ### Language coverage and consistency - A fix in one language's parser usually applies to its siblings. If the change touches `dart/`, ask whether `csharp/`, `cpp/`, and the rest share the shape and need the same fix — or say explicitly why they do not. - Grammars are optional at install time. Code and tests must not assume a grammar is present; tests for one language should skip cleanly without it. ### Tests - Every behavioral fix needs a fixture reproducing the exact construct, and the fixture must be *valid source in that language* — an invalid fixture can pass for the wrong reason. Verify the assertion would fail without the fix. - Prefer asserting on specific edges between specific qualified names over asserting on counts, which pass accidentally. ## Repository conventions - Python 3.12, `ruff` (line length 88), and `uv` for dependencies. Any dependency change must update `uv.lock`; CI fails on drift via `uv lock --check`. - Comments explain *why*, not what. Match the density of surrounding code. ## Calibration Report correctness problems: a wrong edge, a missed construct, a fixture that does not test the fix, a resolution that ignores scope. Do not report style that `ruff` already enforces, and do not restate what the diff does. If the change is correct, say so briefly rather than inventing findings.
Voir sur GitHub