Skip to main content

interview

Use to interview the user about ONE feature of an existing product — the /interview F<n> flow that turns a feature's stub into its file of stories, decisions and questions. The instruction names the feature.

Informations de source

Dépôt
wso2/labs-agentic-engineer
Dernière activité de la source
1 octobre 2026 à 01:19
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
25
Forks
24

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
interview
description
Use to interview the user about ONE feature of an existing product — the /interview F<n> flow that turns a feature's stub into its file of stories, decisions and questions. The instruction names the feature.
metadata
{"aep":{"kind":"platform","audience":["design"]}}
# Interview one feature The product pass (`start`) has written the product page, the product-wide page and a stub per feature. This turn takes ONE feature — the instruction names it (`F2`, or its name) — from a stub to a file the rest of the flow can design from. Everything else stays as it is. Read before you ask: `specs/requirements/prd.md`, `product-wide.md`, the feature's file, the files of the features it needs, and any reference document the project has. The `prd-contract` skill defines what the file holds and every rule its lines follow; `grilling` owns the question mechanics. ## The spine, then the file 1. **Ask the spine — two or three questions, one `ask_questions` form.** The spine is what this feature's stories cannot be written without: who does what in it, and the one or two choices every story leans on. Skip what the product page, the product-wide page, an organization default or a document already answers — and say so in a line, so the user sees why it was not asked ("Your policy already says claims go to Xero every night (p.9), so I won't ask about timing."). 2. **Write the feature's file the moment the answers land** — the whole file, per the contract: Purpose, `Needs:`, User Stories with the feature's next IDs, Decisions, Out of Scope, Open Questions. A line a document states carries its source and is not assumed. A line you decided because the user has not answered carries `*assumed*`, and your reply gives the reason for each, in a clause. 3. **Stop there.** The console walks the assumed lines with the user one at a time, and then offers the next feature; neither is yours to do in chat. Close with one sentence: how many stories and decisions the file has, and how many lines are assumed. **Writing is not converging, but the walk is the round.** Do not ask a second form about the file you just wrote: the assumed lines are the questions, and the user answers them on the lines themselves. ## When the interview cannot go on A **blocking question** is one whose answer changes every story of the feature — Xero or ADP for a payroll export. Do not guess it and do not write stories on top of a guess. Put it in the feature's Open Questions, closed by `*blocking*`, with the two to four answers you would offer as indented bullets (prd-contract, "Open questions"), leave the rest of the file a stub, and say in one sentence what the interview waits on. When the user answers it, the answer becomes a line in Decisions, and a later `/interview` of the feature starts from there. ## Check facts yourself A fact the world holds — what an external service's API allows, a published limit, a regulation's retention period — you check with the tools you have (web search, the organization's registered resources), without asking first. Record what you found as a line with its source (`[Xero API docs]`); a choice you draw from it is still the user's, so it carries `*assumed*`. Only the user holds their own policies and preferences: those are questions, never research. ## Stay in the feature The feature's file is the one you write. A statement the user makes about another feature, or about the whole product, lands where it belongs — the other feature's file, `product-wide.md`, the product page — and your closing sentence says which other files you changed. A need on a feature that is still a stub is fine: record it (`Needs: F5.`) and move on.
Voir sur GitHub