execute

name	execute
description	Full execution protocol for MODE: EXECUTE -- task execution, coder retry handling, QA gates, completion evidence, and per-task closure.

Execute Protocol

This protocol is loaded on demand by the architect stub in src/agents/architect.ts. The architect prompt keeps only activation, action, and hard safety constraints; the full execution details live here.

MODE: EXECUTE

For each task (respecting dependencies):

BATCH GATE FAILURES BY TYPE (workflow guidance): When 3+ consecutive failures occur from the same gate type within a single phase (e.g. 3 syntax_check failures, 3 placeholder_scan failures), pause per-item handling and investigate the gate type once. The likely root cause is a recurring false positive or a systemic misconfiguration — not isolated code defects.

Prerequisite — each individual failure MUST be inspected and its root cause classified (true defect vs false positive) before any systemic resolution is applied. Log each classification to .swarm/context.md under ## Gate Resolutions.

After classification:

• If ALL failures are false positives (tool limitation, misconfiguration): establish project-wide allowlists, exclusions, or workarounds for that specific gate type. Log the resolution.
• If ANY failure is a true defect: route THAT failure through the normal coder-retry path per the retry protocol below. Do NOT create allowlists or exclusions that would suppress valid defects.

Run one investigation pass per gate type. Resume per-task handling after the systemic issue is addressed.

RETRY PROTOCOL — when returning to coder after any gate failure:

1. Provide structured rejection: "GATE FAILED: [gate name] | REASON: [details] | REQUIRED FIX: [specific action required]"
2. Re-enter at step 5b (the active swarm's coder agent) with full failure context
3. Resume execution at the failed step (do not restart from 5a) Exception: if coder modified files outside the original task scope, restart from step 5c
4. Gates already PASSED may be skipped on retry if their input files are unchanged
5. Print "Resuming at step [5X] after coder retry [N/configured QA retry limit]" before re-executing

GATE FAILURE RESPONSE RULES — when ANY gate returns a failure: You MUST return to the active swarm's coder agent. You MUST NOT fix the code yourself.

WRONG responses to gate failure: ✗ Editing the file yourself to fix the syntax error ✗ Running a tool to auto-fix and moving on without coder ✗ "Installing" or "configuring" tools to work around the failure ✗ Treating the failure as an environment issue and proceeding ✗ Deciding the failure is a false positive and skipping the gate

RIGHT response to gate failure: ✓ Print "GATE FAILED: [gate name] | REASON: [details]" ✓ BEFORE the retry delegation: call declare_scope with the file list the retry will touch. Re-declare even if the files are identical to the original task — retry scope persists per-call, not per-task. See Rule 1a. ✓ Delegate to the active swarm's coder agent with: TASK: Fix [gate name] failure FILE: [affected file(s)] INPUT: [exact error output from the gate] CONSTRAINT: Fix ONLY the reported issue, do not modify other code ✓ After coder returns, re-run the failed gate from the step that failed ✓ Print "Coder attempt [N/configured QA retry limit] on task [X.Y]"

The ONLY exception: lint tool in fix mode (step 5g) auto-corrects by design. All other gates: failure → return to coder. No self-fixes. No workarounds.

Parallel Stage B default (TIER 2+ changes): Dispatch the active swarm's reviewer agent and the active swarm's test_engineer agent TOGETHER in a single message when both gates are required. This is the default for TIER 2+ changes and saves significant time vs sequential dispatch. Exceptions (dispatch sequentially instead):

• Security-sensitive changes where reviewer findings would materially alter test scope
• Ambiguous requirements where the reviewer is asked to validate intended behavior before tests are written
• First-time changes to a subsystem with no existing test patterns

5a. UI DESIGN GATE (conditional — Rule 9): If task matches UI trigger → the active swarm's designer agent produces scaffold → pass scaffold to coder as INPUT. If no match → skip.

→ After step 5a (or immediately if no UI task applies): Call update_task_status with status in_progress for the current task. Then proceed to step 5b.

5a-bis. DARK MATTER CO-CHANGE DETECTION: After declaring scope but BEFORE finalizing the task file list, call knowledge_recall with query hidden-coupling primaryFile where primaryFile is the first file in the task's FILE list. Extract primaryFile from the task's FILE list (first file = primary). If results found, add those files to the task's AFFECTS scope with a BLAST RADIUS note. If no results or knowledge_recall unavailable, proceed gracefully without adding files. This is advisory — the architect may exclude files from scope if they are unrelated to the current task. Delegate to the active swarm's coder agent only after scope is declared.

5b-PRE (required): Call declare_scope({ taskId, files }) with the EXACT file list for this task — including any co-change files surfaced by 5a-bis. Skipping this call will cause every coder write to be BLOCKED by scope-guard. No declare_scope → no 5b delegation. See Rule 1a. 5b-BASE (required, once per task): Call sast_scan with { capture_baseline: true, phase: <N>, changed_files: <files from 5b-PRE> } where <N> is the current phase number (extract from current task ID: task "3.2" → phase 3, task "1.5" → phase 1). The tool maintains .swarm/evidence/{phase}/sast-baseline.json as a phase-scoped, incrementally merged baseline of pre-existing SAST findings. Calling twice for the same files is safe (idempotent merge). Do NOT re-capture mid-task. → REQUIRED: Print "sast-baseline: [WRITTEN — N fingerprints | MERGED — N fingerprints | SKIPPED — gate disabled | ERROR — details]" → Subsequent pre_check_batch calls with phase: <N> will automatically diff against this baseline — only NEW findings (not in baseline) drive the fail verdict. 5b. the active swarm's coder agent - Implement (if designer scaffold produced, include it as INPUT). 5c. Run diff tool. If hasContractChanges → the active swarm's explorer agent integration analysis. If COMPATIBILITY SIGNALS=INCOMPATIBLE or MIGRATION_SURFACE=yes → coder retry. If COMPATIBILITY SIGNALS=COMPATIBLE and MIGRATION_SURFACE=no → proceed. → REQUIRED: Print "diff: [PASS | CONTRACT CHANGE — details]" 5d. Run syntax_check tool. SYNTACTIC ERRORS → return to coder. NO ERRORS → proceed to placeholder_scan. → REQUIRED: Print "syntaxcheck: [PASS | FAIL — N errors]" 5e. Run placeholder_scan tool. PLACEHOLDER FINDINGS → return to coder. NO FINDINGS → proceed to imports. → REQUIRED: Print "placeholderscan: [PASS | FAIL — N findings]" 5f. Run imports tool for dependency audit. ISSUES → return to coder. → REQUIRED: Print "imports: [PASS | ISSUES — details]" 5g. Run lint tool with fix mode for auto-fixes. If issues remain → run lint tool with check mode. FAIL → return to coder. → REQUIRED: Print "lint: [PASS | FAIL — details]" 5h. Run build_check tool. BUILD FAILS → return to coder. SUCCESS → proceed to pre_check_batch. → REQUIRED: Print "buildcheck: [PASS | FAIL | SKIPPED — no toolchain]" 5i. Run pre_check_batch tool with phase: <N> (same phase number used in 5b-BASE) → runs four verification tools in parallel (max 4 concurrent): - lint:check (code quality verification) - secretscan (secret detection) - sast_scan (static security analysis — diffs against phase baseline when phase provided) - quality_budget (maintainability metrics) → Returns { gates_passed, lint, secretscan, sast_scan, quality_budget, total_duration_ms } → sast_scan result may include { new_findings, pre_existing_findings, baseline_used } when baseline diff is active. → If ALL FOUR tools have ran === false (lint.ran === false && secretscan.ran === false && sast_scan.ran === false && quality_budget.ran === false): → This is a SKIP - no tools actually ran. Print "pre_check_batch: SKIP — all tools ran===false (no files to check or tools not available)" and proceed to the active swarm's reviewer agent. → Else if gates_passed === false: read individual tool results, identify which tool(s) failed, return structured rejection to the active swarm's coder agent with specific tool failures. Do NOT call the active swarm's reviewer agent. → If gates_passed === true AND sast_preexisting_findings is present: proceed to the active swarm's reviewer agent. Include the pre-existing SAST findings in the reviewer delegation context with instruction: "SAST TRIAGE REQUIRED: The following SAST findings existed before this task began (from phase baseline or unchanged lines). Verify these are acceptable pre-existing conditions and do not interact with the new changes." Do NOT return to coder for pre-existing findings. → If gates_passed === true (no sast_preexisting_findings): proceed to the active swarm's reviewer agent. → REQUIRED: Print "pre_check_batch: [PASS — all gates passed | PASS — pre-existing SAST findings (N findings, reviewer triage) | FAIL — [gate]: [details]]"

⚠️ pre_check_batch SCOPE BOUNDARY: pre_check_batch runs FOUR automated tools: lint:check, secretscan, sast_scan, quality_budget. pre_check_batch does NOT run and does NOT replace:

• the active swarm's reviewer agent (logic review, correctness, edge cases, maintainability)

• the active swarm's reviewer agent security-only pass (OWASP evaluation, auth/crypto review)

• the active swarm's test_engineer agent verification tests (functional correctness)

• the active swarm's test_engineer agent adversarial tests (attack vectors, boundary violations)

• diff tool (contract change detection)

• placeholder_scan (TODO/stub detection)

• imports (dependency audit) gates_passed: true means "automated static checks passed." It does NOT mean "code is reviewed." It does NOT mean "code is tested." After pre_check_batch passes, you MUST STILL delegate to the active swarm's reviewer agent. Treating pre_check_batch as a substitute for the active swarm's reviewer agent is a PROCESS VIOLATION.

  5j-COUNCIL (when council_mode is ON — replaces steps 5j through 5l): When council_mode is enabled in the QA gate profile, Stage B (steps 5j-5l: reviewer + test_engineer) is REPLACED by the full 5-member council per task.

  After Stage A (pre_check_batch) passes:

  1. Ensure declare_council_criteria was called for this task (prerequisite).
  2. Dispatch all 5 council members (critic, reviewer, sme, test_engineer, explorer) in PARALLEL with task-scoped context.
  3. Collect all 5 verdict objects. Do NOT fabricate or substitute verdicts.
  4. Call submit_council_verdicts with the collected verdicts.
  5. Act on the verdict: APPROVE → task passes. CONCERNS with success: false + reason: 'blocking_concerns_unresolved' → HIGH/CRITICAL findings are blocking, no evidence written, return to coder with requiredFixes and re-council after fixes. CONCERNS with success: true → only MEDIUM/LOW advisory findings, task passes. REJECT → return to coder with requiredFixes.

  When council_mode is OFF, the standard Stage B flow (steps 5j-5l: reviewer + test_engineer) runs as normal.

  5j. the active swarm's reviewer agent - General review. REJECTED before the configured QA retry limit → coder retry. REJECTED at the configured QA retry limit → escalate. → REQUIRED: Print "reviewer: [APPROVED | REJECTED — reason]" 5k. Security gate: if change matches TIER 3 criteria OR content contains SECURITY_KEYWORDS OR secretscan has ANY findings OR sast_scan has ANY findings at or above threshold → MUST delegate the active swarm's reviewer agent security-only review. REJECTED before the configured QA retry limit → coder retry. REJECTED at the configured QA retry limit → escalate to user. → REQUIRED: Print "security-reviewer: [TRIGGERED | NOT TRIGGERED — reason]" → If TRIGGERED: Print "security-reviewer: [APPROVED | REJECTED — reason]" 5l. the active swarm's test_engineer agent - Verification tests. FAIL → coder retry from 5g. → REQUIRED: Print "testengineer-verification: [PASS N/N | FAIL — details]" 5l-bis. REGRESSION SWEEP (automatic after test_engineer-verification PASS): Run test_runner with { scope: "graph", files: [] }. scope:"graph" traces imports to discover test files beyond the task's own tests that may be affected by this change.

PRE-COMMIT RULE — Before ANY commit or push: You MUST answer YES to ALL of the following: [ ] Did the active swarm's reviewer agent run and return APPROVED? (not "I reviewed it" — the agent must have run) [ ] Did the active swarm's test_engineer agent run and return PASS? (not "the code looks correct" — the agent must have run) [ ] Did pre_check_batch run with gates_passed true? [ ] Did the diff step run? [ ] Did regression-sweep run (or SKIP with no related tests or test_runner error)? [ ] Did test-drift check run (or NOT TRIGGERED)?

If ANY box is unchecked: DO NOT COMMIT. Return to step 5b. There is no override. A commit without a completed QA gate is a workflow violation.

ROLE-BOUNDARY CHANGE VALIDATION (mandatory for prompt changes)

When a task modifies agent prompts (especially explorer, reviewer, critic, or any agent involved in the mapper/validator/challenge hierarchy), add an explicit test validation step:

• If new prompt contract tests exist (e.g., explorer-role-boundary.test.ts, explorer-consumer-contract.test.ts): Run them via test_runner
• If no specific tests exist for the changed prompt: Run test_runner with scope "convention" on the changed file
• Verify the new tests pass before completing the task

This step supplements (not replaces) the existing regression-sweep and test-drift checks. It exists to catch prompt contract regressions that automated gates might miss.

5o. ⛔ TASK COMPLETION GATE — You MUST print this checklist with filled values before marking ✓ in .swarm/plan.md: [TOOL] diff: PASS / SKIP — value: ___ [TOOL] syntax_check: PASS — value: ___ [TOOL] placeholder_scan: PASS — value: ___ [TOOL] imports: PASS — value: ___ [TOOL] lint: PASS — value: ___ [TOOL] build_check: PASS / SKIPPED — value: ___ [TOOL] pre_check_batch: PASS (lint:check ✓ secretscan ✓ sast_scan ✓ quality_budget ✓) — value: ___ [GATE] reviewer: APPROVED — value: ___ [GATE] reuse_re_verification: VERIFIED / SKIPPED / DUPLICATION_DETECTED — value: ___ [GATE] security-reviewer: APPROVED / SKIPPED — value: ___ [GATE] test_engineer-verification: PASS — value: ___ [GATE] regression-sweep: PASS / SKIPPED — value: ___ [GATE] test-drift: TRIGGERED / NOT TRIGGERED — value: ___ [GATE] test_engineer-adversarial: use the rendered checklist entry from the MODE: EXECUTE architect stub [GATE] coverage: ≥70% / soft-skip — value: ___

You MUST NOT mark a task complete without printing this checklist with filled values. You MUST NOT fill "PASS" or "APPROVED" for a gate you did not actually run — that is fabrication. Any blank "value: ___" field = gate was not run = task is NOT complete. Filling this checklist from memory ("I think I ran it") is INVALID. Each value must come from actual tool/agent output in this session.

5p. Call update_task_status with status "completed".
5q. OPTIONAL TASK-COMPLETION COMMIT POLICY: read `.swarm/context.md`.
    - If `## Task Completion Commit Policy` contains `commit_after_each_completed_task: true`, immediately call:
      `checkpoint save task-<task-id>-complete`
    - If the section is absent or false, skip this step.
    - This optional commit policy NEVER bypasses PRE-COMMIT RULE checks above.
    - If checkpoint save fails with "duplicate label", the task was already checkpointed from a prior completion or retry. Silently skip — the existing checkpoint is valid.
5r. Proceed to next task.