Skip to main content

ccg

Claude-Codex-Gemini tri-model orchestration for multi-perspective analysis. Activate when user says: ccg, tri-model, three models, multi-model, cross-validate, get multiple opinions, compare models.

Informations de source

Dépôt
zereight/gitlab-mcp
Dernière activité de la source
12 avril 2026 à 05:11
Langue détectée de SKILL.md
anglais
Étoiles
2 091
Forks
368

Options d'installation

Le prompt qui vérifie d'abord la source est sélectionné par défaut. Vous pouvez passer à une commande directe ou télécharger une copie locale.

Vérifiez les fichiers source

Lisez SKILL.md et les fichiers associés affichés par SkillsMP avant de décider de l'installer.

Affichage de SKILL.md

SKILL.md
Instructions source · Aperçu en lecture seule
name
ccg
description
Claude-Codex-Gemini tri-model orchestration for multi-perspective analysis. Activate when user says: ccg, tri-model, three models, multi-model, cross-validate, get multiple opinions, compare models.
argument-hint
<task description>
# CCG - Claude-Codex-Gemini Tri-Model Orchestration Route a task through three AI models in parallel, then synthesize their outputs into one unified answer. ## When to Use - Backend/analysis + frontend/UI work in one request - Code review from multiple perspectives - Cross-validation where models may disagree - Fast parallel input without full team orchestration ## When NOT to Use - Simple, straightforward tasks → execute directly - Already clear on approach → use `/omg-autopilot` - Need coordinated multi-agent work → use `/team` ## Requirements - **Codex CLI**: `npm install -g @openai/codex` - **Gemini CLI**: `npm install -g @google/gemini-cli` - If either CLI is unavailable, continue with whichever provider works ## Execution Protocol ### 1. Decompose Request Split the user request into: - **Codex prompt**: architecture, correctness, backend, risks, test strategy - **Gemini prompt**: UX/content clarity, alternatives, edge-case usability, docs polish - **Synthesis plan**: how to reconcile conflicts ### 2. Invoke Advisors Run both advisors via CLI in parallel: ```bash # Run in terminal codex "<codex prompt>" gemini "<gemini prompt>" ``` Or via VS Code's `selectChatModels()` API if available: ``` Promise.all([ model_openai.sendRequest(codex_prompt), model_google.sendRequest(gemini_prompt) ]) ``` ### 3. Collect Results Gather outputs from both advisors. ### 4. Synthesize Return one unified answer with: - **Agreed** recommendations - **Conflicting** recommendations (explicitly called out) - **Chosen** final direction + rationale - **Action** checklist ## Fallbacks | Scenario | Action | |----------|--------| | One provider unavailable | Continue with available + Claude synthesis | | Both unavailable | Fall back to Claude-only answer | ## Example ``` /ccg Review this PR - architecture/security via Codex and UX/readability via Gemini ``` Output: ``` === CCG Synthesis === ## Agreed - Authentication middleware needs rate limiting - Error messages should be more user-friendly ## Conflicting - Codex: Use middleware pattern for validation - Gemini: Use inline validation for simplicity → Chosen: Middleware pattern (consistency with existing codebase) ## Action Checklist - [ ] Add rate limiting middleware - [ ] Improve error messages in auth flow - [ ] Extract validation to middleware layer ```
Voir sur GitHub