// Use when designing or writing mechanism tests and heterogeneity analyses for a Management-World empirical manuscript. Required for nearly all MW empirical submissions.
Use when assembling the data-and-code replication package required by 《管理世界》 after conditional acceptance, drafting the README in Chinese, or auditing a deposit before editorial-office submission. Implements 《管理世界》"数据可获得性政策" (effective 2023, updated 2025), with explicit handling for CSMAR / Wind / 国泰安 等受限商业数据库 and Chinese government micro-data.
Use when deciding which mw-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for 《管理世界》 (Management World). Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
Use when the empirical identification strategy is the bottleneck for a Management-World manuscript — quasi-experimental designs (DID, IV, RDD, DML, event study) with Chinese policy shocks. Stress-tests the design before drafting tables.
Use when drafting or revising the institutional-background section of a Management-World manuscript, when the China policy timeline is unclear, or when reviewers ask for stronger institutional context.
Use when drafting or revising the literature-review section for a Management-World manuscript, when the Chinese / English reference balance is off, or when canonical Chinese references are missing.
Use when drafting or strengthening the policy-implications section of a Management-World manuscript. Enforces layered (short / mid / long-term, micro / meso / macro) actionable recommendations.
| name | mw-mechanism-heterogeneity |
| description | Use when designing or writing mechanism tests and heterogeneity analyses for a Management-World empirical manuscript. Required for nearly all MW empirical submissions. |
本文进一步从[机制名]角度提供证据。
首先，[机制变量 M] 与[处理变量 D]的关系：……
其次，在[M 强 / 弱] 子样本中，主效应分别为：……
这一结果支持……机制。
按《管理世界》读者期待度排序：
至少切 3 个维度，每个维度至少 2 个子样本对比。
【机制数】X 个
【异质性维度】X 个
【系数差异检验】是 / 否
【机制理论引用】[文献]
【下一步】mw-tables-figures