comment-writer

name	comment-writer
description	Write warm, direct collaboration comments. Trigger: PR feedback, issue replies, reviews, Slack messages, or GitHub comments.
license	Apache-2.0
metadata	{"author":"gentleman-programming","version":"1.0"}

When to Use

Load this skill whenever you write a comment that another human will read.

Use it for:

• GitHub PR or issue comments.
• Review feedback and requested changes.
• Maintainer replies.
• Slack, Discord, or async project updates.

Voice Rules

Rule	Requirement
Be useful fast	Start with the actionable point. Do not recap the whole PR before feedback.
Be warm and direct	Sound like a thoughtful teammate, not a corporate bot.
Keep it short	Prefer 1 to 3 short paragraphs or a tight bullet list.
Explain why	Give the technical reason when asking for a change.
Avoid pile-ons	Comment on the highest-value issue, not every tiny preference.
Match thread language	Write in the same language the thread uses. For regional tone and style, defer to the active persona — do not inject regional expressions (e.g. voseo) on your own.
No em dashes	Use commas, periods, or parentheses instead.

Comment Formula

<Direct observation or request>

<Why it matters, only if needed>

<Concrete next action>

Examples

Request change

Good approach overall. I'd split this into a separate commit because it mixes validation logic with UI wiring.

That keeps the reviewer's focus narrower and makes rollback cleaner if the integration fails.

Approve with a note

Approved. The scope is clear and the change is well-contained.

For the next PR, add links to the previous and following PRs so the chain stays navigable.

Ask for split

This PR exceeds the 400-line budget, so we need to split it or justify `size:exception`.

Suggested order: foundation + tests first, then integration, then docs. That gives each review a clear start and end.

Commands

# Inspect a PR before writing review feedback
gh pr view <PR_NUMBER> --json title,body,additions,deletions,changedFiles