judgment-day

Name: Judgment Day
Author: Gentleman-Programming

// Trigger: judgment day, dual review, adversarial review, juzgar. Run blind dual review, fix confirmed issues, then re-judge.

Exécuter dans Manus

$ git log --oneline --stat

stars:3 459

forks:417

updated:28 mai 2026 à 14:39

Explorateur de fichiers

2 fichiers

SKILL.md

readonly

name	judgment-day
description	Trigger: judgment day, dual review, adversarial review, juzgar. Run blind dual review, fix confirmed issues, then re-judge.
license	Apache-2.0
metadata	{"author":"gentleman-programming","version":"1.4"}

Activation Contract

Load this skill only when the user explicitly asks for Judgment Day, dual/adversarial review, or equivalent Spanish trigger (juzgar, que lo juzguen). Review a specific target: files, feature, PR, or architecture slice.

Hard Rules

Resolve project skills before launching agents: read skill registry, match skill paths by target files/task, and inject the same Skills to load before work block into both judge prompts and fix prompts.
Launch two blind judges in parallel with identical target and criteria; never review the code yourself.
Wait for both judges before synthesis; never accept a partial verdict.
Classify warnings as WARNING (real) only if normal intended use can trigger them; otherwise downgrade to INFO as WARNING (theoretical).
Ask before fixing Round 1 confirmed issues.
After any fix agent runs, immediately re-launch both judges in parallel before commit/push/done/session summary.
Terminal states are only JUDGMENT: APPROVED or JUDGMENT: ESCALATED.
After 2 fix iterations with remaining issues, ask the user whether to continue.

Decision Gates

Condition	Action
Target unclear	Ask for scope; do not launch judges.
No skill registry	Warn, proceed with generic criteria, and record `Skill Resolution: none`.
Both judges find same CRITICAL/real WARNING	Confirmed; ask/fix according to round rules.
One judge finds issue	Suspect; report and triage, do not auto-fix.
Judges contradict	Escalate for manual decision.
Round 2+ has only theoretical warnings/suggestions	Report as INFO; do not re-judge.

Execution Steps

Confirm target and optional custom criteria.
Resolve exact skill paths from registry or warn if missing.
Start Judge A and Judge B concurrently via delegation.
Synthesize findings into confirmed, suspect, contradiction, and INFO buckets.
Ask before Round 1 fixes; delegate a separate fix agent for confirmed approved fixes only.
Re-judge in parallel after fixes; repeat until approved, escalated, or user asks to stop.
Before any terminal action, verify every active Judgment Day has a terminal state.

Output Contract

Return ## Judgment Day — {target} with round number, verdict table, confirmed/suspect/contradiction counts, fixes applied, re-judgment result, Skill Resolution, and final JUDGMENT: APPROVED ✅ or JUDGMENT: ESCALATED ⚠️.