Skip to main content

deep-thinking

Activates extended reasoning for complex problems. Use when asked to "think harder", "ultrathink", "think deeply", "analyze thoroughly", or when facing architecture decisions, complex debugging, system design, or trade-off analysis.

インストールへ移動

ソース情報

リポジトリ
abdullah1854/MCPGateway
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年1月18日 04:58
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
16
フォーク
2

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
deep-thinking
description
Activates extended reasoning for complex problems. Use when asked to "think harder", "ultrathink", "think deeply", "analyze thoroughly", or when facing architecture decisions, complex debugging, system design, or trade-off analysis.
allowed-tools
["Read","Grep","Glob","Task","TodoWrite"]
# Deep Thinking Protocol ## When This Skill Activates - User says "think harder", "ultrathink", "think step by step", "think deeply" - Complex architecture or system design questions - Debugging that requires root cause analysis - Trade-off analysis between multiple approaches - Code review requiring security/performance deep dive - Any problem with multiple valid solutions ## Extended Reasoning Process ### Phase 1: Problem Decomposition Before answering, break the problem into components: 1. What is the core question being asked? 2. What are the constraints (performance, security, maintainability)? 3. What context do I need that I don't have? 4. What assumptions am I making? ### Phase 2: Multi-Path Analysis For each viable approach: 1. **Describe the approach** in 2-3 sentences 2. **Pros**: What makes this approach good? 3. **Cons**: What are the downsides or risks? 4. **When to use**: Under what conditions is this best? ### Phase 3: Edge Case Hunting Actively look for: - What happens with empty/null inputs? - What happens at scale (1M+ records)? - What happens with concurrent access? - What happens when dependencies fail? - What are the security implications? ### Phase 4: Recommendation Provide a clear recommendation with: 1. The chosen approach and why 2. Key implementation steps 3. What to watch out for 4. How to validate it works ## Self-Critique Loop After initial analysis, critique your own thinking: - Did I consider all stakeholders? - Am I biased toward familiar solutions? - What would a senior engineer challenge here? - Is there a simpler solution I overlooked? ## Output Format ``` ## Analysis: [Problem Title] ### Understanding [Restate the problem to confirm understanding] ### Approaches Considered 1. **[Approach A]**: [Brief description] - Pros: ... - Cons: ... 2. **[Approach B]**: [Brief description] - Pros: ... - Cons: ... ### Edge Cases & Risks - [Edge case 1]: [How to handle] - [Edge case 2]: [How to handle] ### Recommendation [Clear recommendation with reasoning] ### Implementation Steps 1. [Step 1] 2. [Step 2] ... ### Validation [How to verify the solution works] ``` ## Key Principle Take the time to think thoroughly. A well-reasoned 2-minute response beats a rushed 10-second response that misses critical issues.
GitHubで見る