Scan one or more directories of agents in ANY paradigm — Claude Code, n8n workflow exports, framework apps (LangChain/CrewAI/AutoGen), or freeform-coded agents — assess quality (fleet maturity for Claude Code, migration readiness for the rest), design the right fleet architecture (hierarchy, knowledge brain, memory, canon layer), map every improvement to an installable skill from the abilities plugin marketplace, and generate a PDF report plus a markdown twin that agents can execute as a work order. Value-first — useful whether or not you ever deploy to Trinity.
Scan one or more directories of agents in ANY paradigm — Claude Code, n8n workflow exports, framework apps (LangChain/CrewAI/AutoGen), or freeform-coded agents — assess quality (fleet maturity for Claude Code, migration readiness for the rest), design the right fleet architecture (hierarchy, knowledge brain, memory, canon layer), map every improvement to an installable skill from the abilities plugin marketplace, and generate a PDF report plus a markdown twin that agents can execute as a work order. Value-first — useful whether or not you ever deploy to Trinity.
{"version":"2.3.3","created":"2026-07-30T00:00:00.000Z","updated":"2026-08-07T00:00:00.000Z","author":"Ability.ai","changelog":["2.3.3: New gap `freeform delegation` — prose schedule messages or prose inter-agent briefs instead of one-line playbook calls (fleet convention protocols/playbook-call.md); mapped to agent-dev:adjust-playbook in the marketplace table","2.3.2: The .gitignore audit list matches Trinity's current birth-state set — adds .env.*, credentials.json, *.pem, *.key, .claude/plugins/ and .claude/settings.json (container-only config that bricks outside clones, trinity#2036), and notes the platform enforces this on every Push","2.3.1: Upgrade-path table now names `agent-dev:add-project-management` — the skill moved into the agent-dev plugin, and this was the one row emitting an un-namespaced command into generated work orders","2.3: Marketplace integration — published into the agent-dev plugin (abilities marketplace); frontmatter normalized to marketplace conventions (comma-separated allowed-tools)","2.2: Universal agent discovery — classify n8n / framework (LangChain, CrewAI, AutoGen) / freeform-coded agents as first-class inventory entries (paradigm field), scan depth 2 -> 3; Migration Readiness score (0-100) for non-Claude-Code agents; marketplace upgrade paths — every recommendation maps to an installable abilities-marketplace skill (add-orchestrator, add-memory, kb-agent, add-canon, create-agent:custom, trinity:onboard); new 'Making your agents useful' report section; JSON schema + report script additions (paradigm column, upgrade_paths)","2.1: Markdown report twin (agent-executable work order) alongside the PDF; roadmap reframed to agent-speed (hours, not weeks); multiple scan paths per invocation; empty CLAUDE.md scores 0 for identity; local-run output path fallback; schema field name fix (maturity_score)","2.0: Reframe — fleet quality + architecture first, Trinity as natural landing in phase 4 only; score renamed Fleet Maturity Score; roadmap phases 1-3 platform-agnostic","1.0: Initial version — agent scan, Trinity compatibility scoring, fleet architecture recommendation, ASCII topology, 4-phase migration roadmap, ReportLab PDF"]}
Agent Fleet Analysis
ℹ️ First, set expectations: before anything else, print one short line with this skill's version and its most recent change — the top entry of metadata.changelog above — e.g. agent-fleet-analysis vX.Y — recent: <summary>. Then proceed.
Scan a collection of agents — Claude Code agents AND agents built any other way (n8n workflows, LangChain/CrewAI/AutoGen apps, freeform-coded LLM loops) — produce a strategic fleet design recommendation (hierarchy, knowledge brain, memory, canon layer) with every improvement mapped to an installable skill from the abilities plugin marketplace, and generate two artifacts:
A4 PDF report — for humans, with a shareable download URL when running on Trinity.
Markdown report — the machine-readable twin, written alongside the PDF. This is the agent-executable version: every gap, quick win, and roadmap item is a checkbox an agent can work through. Hand it to a Claude Code session (or the fleet hub) as the work order for fixing the fleet.
The report is useful regardless of deployment platform. It tells you how well your agents are designed, how they should be organized, and what's missing. If you want to run the fleet autonomously in the cloud, the last section shows how Trinity handles that — but the organizational work comes first and stands on its own.
Timescale framing (important): everything the report recommends is agent-executable work. A single Claude Code session can fix the gaps across every agent, create Trinity-compatible copies, and deploy them — in a couple of hours, not weeks. The roadmap phases are a sequence (do 1 before 2), never a calendar. Write the report accordingly: no "this week / next month" language anywhere.
Usage
/agent-fleet-analysis [path ...]
path (optional, one or more): directories to scan. Defaults to . (current directory). Multiple paths (space- or newline-separated) are scanned in one run and merged into a single report.
The skill is fully autonomous — it runs through all steps and prints the report locations (and a shareable URL when on Trinity) at the end.
Step 1: Resolve the Scan Paths
Parse $ARGS into a list of paths (whitespace/newline separated; ignore any leading free-text note the user included). If no paths given, use the current directory.
For each path: if it doesn't exist, report it and continue with the remaining paths. If NO valid paths remain, print an error and stop.
Step 2: Discover Agents (any paradigm)
Discovery runs in two passes over each scan path, up to 3 levels deep (agents often live one level down inside an agents/ or workflows/ folder). Every discovered agent becomes a first-class inventory entry with a paradigm field — nothing is demoted to a footnote.
Pass 1 — Claude Code agents (paradigm: claude-code)
An agent directory is any directory containing at least one of CLAUDE.md, template.yaml, or a .claude/ subdirectory:
Deduplicate (same directory found via multiple markers). Nested agent directories are allowed (a sub-agent inside a parent repo) — record both, and note the nesting in the report.
Pass 2 — other agent paradigms
For directories NOT already claimed by Pass 1, classify by evidence (first match wins):
Paradigm
Evidence
n8n
workflow.json, or any *.json whose top level has both "nodes" and "connections" keys — each workflow (or a folder of them) is one agent entry
framework
Source files importing langchain, crewai, autogen, openai Assistants API, or similar agent frameworks (grep *.py/*.js/*.ts, excluding venv/node_modules)
freeform-coded
LLM API usage (anthropic/openai/gemini SDK or direct REST calls) PLUS prompt assets (a prompts/ dir, *_prompt* files, system_prompt*) or an evident agentic loop — an agent written in plain code with no framework
non-agent
None of the above — list the path once under "Scanned, not agents" in the report and move on
Use judgment on granularity: an n8n export folder with one orchestrator + several sub-workflows can be inventoried as one fleet-let with named members, or as individual agents if they are clearly independent.
If zero agents are found across ALL paths (all paradigms), print:
No agents found in <paths>. Try a directory containing CLAUDE.md files,
n8n workflow exports, or agent code (LangChain/CrewAI/LLM API loops).
and stop.
Build the initial agent list — for each discovered agent, record:
dir: absolute path
name: directory basename (or name: field from template.yaml / n8n workflow name if present)
Step 3: Per-Agent Inventory and Fleet Maturity Score
For each claude-code agent directory, run 3a–3f. Agents of other paradigms skip to 3g (Migration Readiness) — their record uses migration_readiness instead of maturity_score. Build a structured record per agent either way.
3a: Read Core Files
AGENT_DIR="<agent_dir>"test -f "$AGENT_DIR/CLAUDE.md" && HAS_CLAUDE_MD=1 || HAS_CLAUDE_MD=0
test -f "$AGENT_DIR/template.yaml" && HAS_TEMPLATE=1 || HAS_TEMPLATE=0
test -f "$AGENT_DIR/.mcp.json.template" && HAS_MCP_TEMPLATE=1 || HAS_MCP_TEMPLATE=0
test -f "$AGENT_DIR/.env.example" && HAS_ENV_EXAMPLE=1 || HAS_ENV_EXAMPLE=0
test -f "$AGENT_DIR/.gitignore" && HAS_GITIGNORE=1 || HAS_GITIGNORE=0
test -d "$AGENT_DIR/.claude" && HAS_CLAUDE_DIR=1 || HAS_CLAUDE_DIR=0
test -d "$AGENT_DIR/.claude/skills" && HAS_SKILLS=1 || HAS_SKILLS=0
test -d "$AGENT_DIR/.claude/memory" && HAS_MEMORY=1 || HAS_MEMORY=0
test -f "$AGENT_DIR/fleet.yaml" && HAS_FLEET=1 || HAS_FLEET=0
Read CLAUDE.md to extract: purpose (first non-empty paragraph), any explicit autonomy/role signals.
If template.yaml exists, read it for: name, display_name, description, resources, credentials, schedules.
If .gitignore exists, check it excludes: .env, .env.*, .mcp.json, credentials.json, *.pem, *.key, content/, .claude/projects/, .claude/plugins/, and .claude/settings.json (container-only config — a committed copy bricks clones made outside the container, trinity#2036). For a Trinity-deployed agent this list is enforced platform-side on every Push, so a gap is repaired rather than silently persisted — but it churns until the repo matches.
3b: Credential Security Scan
# Check for hardcoded credentials (never expose results in the report — just flag pass/fail)
grep -r --include="*.yaml" --include="*.yml" --include="*.json" --include="*.md" \
--include="*.py" --include="*.sh" --include="*.js" --include="*.ts" --include="*.env" \
-lE "(api_key|API_KEY|secret|password|token)\s*[:=]\s*['\"][A-Za-z0-9_\-]{12,}" \
"$AGENT_DIR" 2>/dev/null \
| grep -vE "\.gitignore|\.env\.example|template\.yaml|node_modules|\.venv|__pycache__" \
| wc -l
For each flagged file, classify the match as placeholder vs. real-looking WITHOUT printing values: if the matched value contains your|example|placeholder|xxx|dummy|changeme|<|> (case-insensitive) it's a placeholder — not an exposure. Only real-looking values count.
If any real-looking match remains: credential exposure risk = true (flag in report with file names only, do NOT print the values). Also check whether real .env files exist on disk and whether they are git-tracked (git ls-files inside the agent dir) — a tracked .env is an exposure even if the content scan found nothing.
3c: Fleet Maturity Score (0–100)
Score each agent on agent quality — not platform-specific files. These dimensions apply to any well-designed autonomous agent regardless of where it runs:
Criterion
Points
Why it matters
CLAUDE.md exists with clear identity and purpose — an empty or near-empty file (< 100 bytes of content) scores 0
20
Without clear instructions, the agent's behavior is unpredictable
.env.example exists documenting required env vars
15
Portability — anyone can understand what credentials the agent needs
Security — credentials stay out of version control
.claude/skills/ directory present with ≥ 1 skill
15
Structured capability — the agent knows how to do something specific
.claude/memory/ directory present
10
State persistence — the agent learns and remembers across sessions
No credential exposure detected in tracked files
15
Security hygiene — hardcoded secrets are a critical risk
template.yaml exists (deployment metadata)
10
Deployability — can run on any platform without manual setup
Total
100
Score label:
80–100 → Well-designed (green)
60–79 → Functional (amber)
40–59 → Needs improvement (amber)
0–39 → Early stage (red)
3d: Gap List
For each failed criterion, produce a gap entry with a plain-language action:
CLAUDE.md missing → "Add CLAUDE.md: write a clear purpose statement and operating instructions for this agent. This is the single most important file."
.env.example missing → "Add .env.example listing every environment variable the agent needs (with placeholder values, not real ones). Makes the agent portable and self-documenting."
.gitignore missing/incomplete → "Add .gitignore excluding .env, .env.*, .mcp.json, credentials.json, *.pem, *.key, content/, .claude/projects/, .claude/plugins/, .claude/settings.json — prevents secrets reaching version control and keeps container-only config out of clones (trinity#2036)."
.claude/skills/ missing → "Create .claude/skills/ and add at least one skill file — a markdown file describing a specific task the agent knows how to do. This gives the agent structured, reusable capabilities."
.claude/memory/ missing → "Create .claude/memory/ with a memory_index.json file — lets the agent persist facts, decisions, and context across sessions instead of starting fresh every time."
credential exposure → "URGENT: Remove credentials from tracked files before sharing or deploying this agent. Use .env.example to document what's needed; actual values go in .env (gitignored)."
template.yaml missing → "Add template.yaml describing the agent's name, purpose, and resource needs — enables deployment on any platform (Trinity, Kubernetes, etc.) without manual setup."
freeform delegation (Claude Code agents: a template.yaml schedule message that is prose rather than a one-line /playbook [args] call, or a skill/CLAUDE.md that instructs the agent to brief other agents in prose instead of calling their playbooks) → "Move the work into a named playbook and call it: schedules and inter-agent hand-offs should be one-line /playbook [args] calls (fleet convention protocols/playbook-call.md). Prose briefs are unversioned process — the platform cannot measure or guard them, and changing the process means editing every caller."
3e: Quick Wins vs. Structural Changes
The split is mechanical vs. decision-gated, not fast vs. slow — an agent executes both; structural items just need an operator decision first.
Quick wins (mechanical — an agent applies each in minutes, no decisions needed):
Creating .env.example
Adding .gitignore exclusions
Adding template.yaml (if CLAUDE.md exists — the agent's identity is clear)
Writing a missing/empty CLAUDE.md when the codebase makes the purpose obvious
Structural changes (need an operator design decision before an agent executes):
Adding .claude/skills/ from scratch (which capabilities?)
Refactoring agent to follow stateful-folder pattern
Migrating from a non-Claude-Code framework (n8n, LangChain, etc.)
Deciding whether a codebase should become an autonomous agent at all
3f: Autonomy Level
Infer from what's present:
Has schedules: in template.yaml → scheduled
Has credentials.mcp_servers in template.yaml → mcp-connected
Has .claude/memory/ → memory-enabled
Has .claude/skills/ with ≥ 3 skills → skill-rich
None of the above → basic
Autonomy summary string: list applicable tags joined by , or basic if none.
For n8n, framework, and freeform-coded agents, score how ready the agent is to be converted into a well-designed Claude Code agent. First extract the purpose, trying sources in this order: embedded system prompt → README → workflow/node names (n8n) → code entry points and docstrings.
Criterion
Points
What to look for
Purpose discoverable
25
A system prompt, README, or self-evident workflow/node naming that states what the agent does
Logic extractability
25
Discrete nodes/steps/functions that map to skills; not one tangled script. n8n node graphs usually score high here
Credential hygiene
20
Run the same 3b scan: no real-looking hardcoded secrets in tracked files; env-var or credential-store patterns in use
State/memory articulated
15
A DB schema, state files, or memory structure you can point at (vs. implicit state buried in code)
I/O contracts clear
15
Triggers, webhooks, APIs, input/output shapes documented or evident
Same labels as 3c (Well-designed / Functional / Needs improvement / Early stage) — but the report renders it as "readiness XX%", never "maturity". Autonomy level: describe what exists (cron-triggered, webhook-triggered, manual-run) rather than the Claude Code tags.
Gap list for these agents describes what a conversion needs, not missing dotfiles — e.g. "system prompt embedded in n8n node — extract to CLAUDE.md", "credentials referenced via n8n credential store — map to .env.example", "5 sub-workflows map cleanly to 5 skills". The conversion itself is always a structural change (paradigm migration), executed via create-agent:custom (see Step 4b).
Step 4: Fleet Architecture Recommendation
After all agents are scored, synthesize a fleet architecture across all paradigms — an n8n "Chief" orchestrator or a coded coordinator counts in role assignment just like a Claude Code hub (note its paradigm; making it the actual hub implies migrating it first). Read each agent's purpose field (from CLAUDE.md, or the 3g-extracted purpose) and apply these heuristics:
Role Assignment
Assign each agent exactly one primary role:
Hub / Orchestrator — matches if CLAUDE.md purpose contains any of:
orchestrat, chief, coordinator, chief of staff, manager, director, oversee
Knowledge Brain — matches if purpose contains:
knowledge, brain, research, memory, second brain, intel, information
Domain Manager — matches if purpose contains domain-management signals without hub signals:
product, engineer, marketing, sales, finance, hr, operations, devops
Specialist — default role if no other role matched
If multiple agents match Hub: recommend the highest-scorer as Hub; note the others as Hub candidates. Recommend exactly one orchestrator.
If no Hub exists: recommend the highest-scoring claude-code agent as the candidate Hub (a non-Claude-Code orchestrator, if one exists, is noted as the design blueprint to migrate).
Cornelius Pattern
If there is no Knowledge Brain agent: recommend creating one. Say explicitly:
"Your fleet lacks a shared knowledge layer. Consider adding a Cornelius-style agent: a long-running agent with structured memory that all other agents can query for institutional knowledge, market context, and strategic guidance. The concrete path: /create-agent:kb-agent scaffolds one — a 6-question interview about your domain's ontology, then a Cornelius-shaped agent with a typed graph, layered vault, and scheduled coherence jobs."
If a Knowledge Brain exists: call out which agent fills this role and note which other agents should be wired to query it.
Memory Recommendation (per agent)
For each agent that keeps no state (no .claude/memory/, no articulated state files), recommend a specific memory kind — installed via /agent-dev:add-memory — chosen from what the agent actually does:
file awareness — the agent works over a corpus of documents/code it should know its way around
knowledge graph — the agent accumulates entities and relationships (contacts, competitors, dependencies)
structured state — the agent runs a repeatable process and must remember where things stand (queues, statuses, ledgers)
multi-session tracking — the agent's work spans sessions and it must recall decisions and context
Never recommend generic "add memory" — always name the kind and the one-line reason.
Canon Layer Recommendation
Identify which agents produce shared facts others might consume:
Any agent with "report", "analysis", "research", "track", "monitor" in its purpose → canon publisher candidate
Any agent with "orchestrat", "chief", "coordinator" → canon consumer candidate
Recommend: "Adopt the canon layer after Phase 2 — install via /agent-dev:add-canon — have [publishers] write to canon/agents/<name>/facts.yaml so [consumers] can query current facts without ad-hoc chat calls."
ASCII Fleet Topology Diagram
Draw a simple ASCII diagram. Use this template, filling in actual agent names:
For fleets ≤ 3 agents, simplify to a two-level diagram. For fleets > 8 agents, group specialists by their domain manager.
Draw the diagram in plain ASCII (no Unicode box-drawing — use +, -, |, >, <, v, ^). Ensure the diagram fits in 72 characters wide.
Revised diagram using ASCII-safe characters:
+-------------------+
| [HUB AGENT] | <- Orchestrator
| score: XX% |
+--------+----------+
|
+----------------+----------------+
v v v
+--------------+ +--------------+ +--------------+
| [DOMAIN MGR] | | [KNOWLEDGE] | | [DOMAIN MGR] |
| score: XX% | | score: XX% | | score: XX% |
+------+-------+ +--------------+ +------+-------+
| |
+----+----+ +----+----+
v v v v
[SPEC] [SPEC] [SPEC] [SPEC]
Step 4b: Map Recommendations to Marketplace Skills
Every architecture recommendation must resolve to a runnable install from the abilities plugin marketplace (Abilityai/abilities — the plugin layer maintained by trinity-pm). This is what turns the report from advice into a work order:
Fleet need
Marketplace skill
When to recommend
Designate/create the orchestrator
agent-dev:add-orchestrator
Always — every fleet gets exactly one hub; installs /discover-agents, /orchestrate, /compose-system on it
Add memory (name the kind)
agent-dev:add-memory
Any agent with no persistent state; pick the kind per the Memory Recommendation heuristic in Step 4
Knowledge brain (Cornelius pattern)
create-agent:kb-agent
No Knowledge Brain agent exists in the fleet
Migrate an n8n / framework / freeform agent
create-agent:custom (scaffold) + port the extracted logic
Every non-claude-code agent worth keeping
Shared facts layer
agent-dev:add-canon
≥ 2 agents where one produces facts another consumes
Cross-actor project management
agent-dev:add-project-management
The hub coordinates work across humans + agents
Audit / refine an existing agent
create-agent:review + create-agent:adjust
Any Claude Code agent scoring 40–79
Make a playbook callable by other agents / fix freeform delegation
agent-dev:adjust-playbook (Make Callable by Other Agents)
Any freeform delegation gap
Deploy autonomous, 24/7
trinity:onboard
Phase 4, per agent
Build an upgrade_paths list (see Step 7 JSON): each entry names the need, the marketplace skill, the target agent(s), and a one-line reason. These feed the report's "Making your agents useful" section and turn roadmap checkboxes into commands — e.g. - [ ] Run /agent-dev:add-orchestrator on <hub> instead of "wire the hub".
Step 5: Fleet Improvement Roadmap
Always generate exactly 4 phases. Phases 1-3 are platform-agnostic — they improve the fleet regardless of where it runs. Phase 4 covers autonomous deployment.
The phases are a sequence, not a calendar. All of this is agent-executable work: a single Claude Code session working through the markdown report can complete phases 1-3 across every agent, create Trinity-compatible copies, and deploy them — the whole roadmap lands in a couple of hours. State this explicitly in the report's roadmap intro. Never use week/month language in phase titles or items.
Phase 1 — Fix foundations (minutes per agent):
Focus: fix the most important gaps and establish clear agent identity.
Address any credential exposure issues first — highest priority (remove, rotate, gitignore)
Add .env.example to every agent missing one
Add .gitignore entries to every agent missing them
Write or fix CLAUDE.md wherever it is missing, empty, or unclear
Designate the Hub agent (name it): <hub_agent_name>
Phase 2 — Build capabilities (same session):
Focus: give each agent structured capabilities and make the fleet navigable.
Add .claude/skills/ to agents missing them — start with 2–3 core tasks per agent
Add memory to agents that need to remember state across sessions — /agent-dev:add-memory, naming the kind per agent (file awareness / knowledge graph / structured state / multi-session)
Add template.yaml deployment metadata to every agent
Migrate non-Claude-Code agents worth keeping: /create-agent:custom scaffolds the target, then port the extracted logic (n8n nodes → skills, system prompts → CLAUDE.md)
Document how agents relate to each other: which agent delegates to which
Phase 3 — Connect the fleet (same session):
Focus: connect the fleet into a coherent system.
Make the Hub a real orchestrator: /agent-dev:add-orchestrator on <hub_agent_name> — installs fleet discovery, routing, and system composition
Add or designate a Knowledge Brain agent — /create-agent:kb-agent scaffolds a Cornelius-style agent with structured memory that others query for shared context, decisions, and institutional knowledge
Adopt the canon layer via /agent-dev:add-canon: agents that produce shared facts (reports, analysis, research) write them to canon/agents/<name>/facts.md so other agents can consume current facts without ad-hoc calls
Dry-run the fleet as a coordinated unit — the Hub routes work, specialists execute, knowledge brain answers questions
Phase 4 — Deploy to Trinity (same day):
With phases 1-3 done, the fleet is deployable immediately:
Create Trinity-compatible copies of each agent (template.yaml + .mcp.json.template from phase 2 make this mechanical) and onboard each via /trinity:onboard
Deploy to Trinity (an open-source platform for running Claude Code agents in the cloud, 24/7)
Wire autonomous schedules — each agent runs its own tasks without human prompts (remember the autonomy toggle: schedules only fire when agent autonomy is ON)
Hub orchestrates the fleet via Trinity's agent-to-agent messaging
The fleet runs on its own: schedules fire, agents report back, Hub coordinates
Note: Trinity is free to self-host (Apache 2.0). The organizational work in phases 1–3 is what makes autonomous deployment actually work well — an autonomous fleet of poorly-organized agents is not better than a coordinated fleet of well-designed ones. But "well-organized" is hours of agent work away, not weeks.
Step 6: Compile the Quick Wins List
Aggregate the top quick wins across all agents, deduplicated. Prioritize:
Security issues (credential exposure) — always #1
Missing .env.example (affects every agent missing it)
Write all collected data to /tmp/fleet_analysis_data.json:
{"generated_at":"YYYY-MM-DD","scan_path":"<path>","executive_summary":["<N> agents found in <paths>","Average fleet maturity: <avg>% — fleet status: <Well-designed|Functional|Needs improvement|Early stage>","Recommended hub: <name> (<score>%)","<N> improvements identified — all agent-executable; the full roadmap through Trinity deployment is a couple of hours of agent work"],"agents":[{"name":"<name>","dir":"<path>","paradigm":"<claude-code|n8n|framework|freeform-coded>","purpose":"<first paragraph of CLAUDE.md, or 3g-extracted purpose>","role":"<hub|knowledge|domain-manager|specialist>","autonomy_level":"<tags>","maturity_score": <0-100, claude-code agents only — omit otherwise>,"migration_readiness": <0-100, non-claude-code agents only — omit otherwise>,"score_label":"<Well-designed|Functional|Needs improvement|Early stage>","gaps":["<gap1>", ...],"quick_wins":["<win1>", ...],"structural_changes":["<change1>", ...]}],"upgrade_paths":[{"need":"<orchestrator|memory|knowledge-brain|migration|canon|project-management|audit|deploy>","skill":"<marketplace skill, e.g. agent-dev:add-orchestrator>","targets":["<agent name>", ...],"note":"<one-line reason, incl. memory kind where relevant>"}],"fleet_topology":{"hub":"<agent_name or null>","knowledge_brain":"<agent_name or null>","domain_managers":["<name>", ...],"specialists":["<name>", ...],"ascii_diagram":"<72-char-wide ASCII art, newlines as \\n>","notes":["<Cornelius pattern note if applicable>","<Canon layer recommendation>"]},"roadmap":{"phase1":{"title":"Phase 1 — Fix foundations (minutes per agent)","items":["<item1>", ...]},"phase2":{"title":"Phase 2 — Build capabilities (same session)","items":["<item1>", ...]},"phase3":{"title":"Phase 3 — Connect the fleet (same session)","items":["<item1>", ...]},"phase4":{"title":"Phase 4 — Deploy to Trinity (same day)","items":["<item1>", ...]}},"quick_wins":["<win1>","<win2>", ...]}
Validate that every agent has exactly one of maturity_score / migration_readiness, each an integer 0–100, and a paradigm. Ensure ascii_diagram uses only printable ASCII (no Unicode box-drawing characters). Check no summary, note, or roadmap item uses week/month timescale language. Non-agent paths scanned go into a summary line ("Scanned, not agents: ..."), not into agents.
Local run: OUTPUT_DIR="./session-files/$(date +%Y-%m-%d)_agent_fleet_analysis" if the repo uses a session-files/ convention; otherwise a fleet-analysis/ folder in the working directory. Never write into the scanned repos.
Also copy the data JSON next to the reports (agent-fleet-analysis-${DATE}.json) — agents consuming the report programmatically prefer the structured form.
If the script exits non-zero, print the error and stop.
Step 9: Deliver the Files
On Trinity: call mcp__trinity__share_file for BOTH agent-fleet-analysis-${DATE}.pdf and agent-fleet-analysis-${DATE}.md. Print:
Locally (no Trinity, or the file isn't in the container): print all three paths and, on macOS, open the output folder (open "$OUTPUT_DIR"):
Report saved:
PDF (for humans): <OUTPUT_DIR>/agent-fleet-analysis-<date>.pdf
Markdown (for agents): <OUTPUT_DIR>/agent-fleet-analysis-<date>.md
Data JSON: <OUTPUT_DIR>/agent-fleet-analysis-<date>.json
Executing the report: offer the natural next step — feed the markdown report back to an agent session ("work through the roadmap in ") to actually apply the fixes, create Trinity-compatible copies, and deploy. The report is a work order, not just a document.
Error Handling Reference
Situation
Action
A scan path doesn't exist
Report it, continue with remaining paths; stop only if none remain
