ソース情報
- リポジトリ
- asermax/claude-plugins
- ソースの最終更新活動
- 2026年3月1日 03:49
- 検出された SKILL.md の言語
- 英語
- スター
- 1
- フォーク
- 1
インストール方法
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
ソースファイルを確認
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
メニュー
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
直接コマンドでは確認用 Prompt が省略されます。実行前にソースを確認してください。
npx skills add https://github.com/asermax/claude-plugins --skill retrofit-designコマンドは1行のまま表示されます。コピー前に横へスクロールして全体を確認してください。
ローカルで確認しますか?SkillsMP が現在取得できるファイルをダウンロードできます。
Build something already designed, together with the user, then verify it and offer to commit. Use when a design is agreed and the work is ready to write, or when another skill needs the shared build discipline.
Load first when working with any zenku skill. Carries the vocabulary, the two rules, how to find the project's vault and conventions, and the habits for writing into it.
Lay out the current shape so the user can settle a new one — which modules exist, where the seams are, how data flows, and what earlier quests already decided. Use when the user wants to design a feature or a module, work out an interface, decide where a boundary belongs, or when another skill needs a shape agreed before code.
SOC 職業分類に基づく
SKILL.md を表示中
| name | retrofit-design |
| description | Create design documentation from existing implementation |
| argument-hint | <ID> |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Create design documentation from existing implementation code.
Feature path: $ARGUMENTS (e.g., "auth/login" for docs/feature-specs/auth/login.md)
You must load the following skills and read the following files before proceeding.
katachi:retrofit-existing - Retrofit workflowdocs/feature-designs/README.md - Feature design indexdocs/feature-specs/$ARGUMENTS.md - The feature specification (created by retrofit-spec, e.g., auth/login.md)docs/architecture/README.md - Architecture decisions (ADRs)docs/design/README.md - Design patterns (DES)docs/feature-designs/$ARGUMENTS.md - Current design to update or createdocs/planning/VISION.md - Project context for inference${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/framework-core/references/technical-diagrams.md - Technical diagram guidance${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/framework-core/references/code-examples.md - Code snippet guidanceVerify prerequisites:
docs/feature-specs/$ARGUMENTS.md/katachi:retrofit-spec firstIf docs/feature-designs/$ARGUMENTS.md exists:
If no design exists: proceed with creation
Update status:
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/deltas.py status set $ARGUMENTS "⧗ Design"
docs/feature-specs/$ARGUMENTS.md)docs/architecture/README.md)docs/design/README.md)Task(
subagent_type="katachi:codebase-analyzer",
prompt=f"""
Analyze this code to create a design document.
## Analysis Type
design
## Retrofitted Spec
{spec_content}
## Implementation Code
{code_content}
## Project Context
{vision_content if exists else "Infer from code"}
## Existing ADR Index
{adr_index}
## Existing DES Index
{des_index}
"""
)
Show the agent's draft design document.
Highlight uncertainties and assumptions made during inference.
Ask: "What needs adjustment in this inferred design?"
Apply user corrections:
Re-present updated sections if significant changes. Repeat until user approves the core design.
Review the Key Decisions section for ADR/DES candidates.
Present discovered decisions:
"I identified these undocumented decisions while analyzing the design:
1. **[Decision Name]** (architectural choice)
[Brief description]
Recommendation: Create ADR
2. **[Pattern Name]** (repeatable pattern)
[Brief description]
Recommendation: Create DES
3. **[Minor Choice]** (design choice)
[Brief description]
Recommendation: Document inline only
Which decisions should become formal ADR/DES documents?"
For each decision the user agrees to document:
# Spawn retrofit-decision inline
Task(
subagent_type="katachi:codebase-analyzer", # Initial analysis
prompt=f"""
Analyze this code to document a specific decision.
## Analysis Type
decision
## Topic
{decision_topic}
## Relevant Code
{code_related_to_decision}
## Project Context
{vision_content}
"""
)
After each ADR/DES is created:
Dispatch the design-reviewer agent:
Task(
subagent_type="katachi:design-reviewer",
prompt=f"""
Review this retrofitted feature design.
## Feature Spec (Retrofitted)
{spec_content}
## Completed Design
{design_content}
## ADR Index Summary
{adr_summary}
## DES Index Summary
{des_summary}
Note: This design was inferred from existing code.
"""
)
Review agent findings with user. Discuss which recommendations to accept.
Ask: "Should we iterate based on validation feedback, or is the design complete?"
If gaps to address → refine relevant sections (go back to step 4) If complete → finalize document
Write design to docs/feature-designs/$ARGUMENTS.md:
# Design: [FEATURE-ID] - [Feature Name]
**Feature Spec**: [../feature-specs/FEATURE-ID.md](../feature-specs/FEATURE-ID.md)
**Status**: Approved
## Retrofit Note
This design was created from existing code at `[path from spec]`.
Original implementation date: [from git history or "Unknown"]
Decisions documented during retrofit: [ADR-XXX, DES-YYY, ...]
---
## Purpose
This document captures the design rationale inferred from the existing implementation.
## Problem Context
[Inferred from what the code solves]
## Design Overview
[High-level approach extracted from code]
## Modeling
[Entities/relationships from code structure]
## Data Flow
[Traced from execution paths]
## Key Decisions
### [Decision Name]
**Choice**: [What the code shows]
**Why**: [Inferred rationale]
**Related**: [ADR-XXX if created during retrofit]
## System Behavior
[Documented from code paths]
## Notes
- Assumptions made during analysis: [list]
Update status:
python ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/deltas.py status set $ARGUMENTS "✓ Design"
"Design retrofitted for existing code:
File: docs/feature-designs/$ARGUMENTS.md
Status: ✓ Design
Decisions created: [ADR-XXX, DES-YYY, ...]
The feature now has both specification and design documentation.
You can now:
- Retrofit another spec: /katachi:retrofit-spec <path>
- Retrofit another design: /katachi:retrofit-design <ID>
- Document additional decisions: /katachi:retrofit-decision <topic>
- Run gap analysis: /katachi:analyze"
This is a collaborative process: