ソース情報
- リポジトリ
- asermax/claude-plugins
- ソースの最終更新活動
- 2026年8月3日 14:37
- 検出された SKILL.md の言語
- 英語
- スター
- 1
- フォーク
- 1
インストール方法
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
ソースファイルを確認
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
メニュー
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
直接コマンドでは確認用 Prompt が省略されます。実行前にソースを確認してください。
npx skills add https://github.com/asermax/claude-plugins --skill commitコマンドは1行のまま表示されます。コピー前に横へスクロールして全体を確認してください。
ローカルで確認しますか?SkillsMP が現在取得できるファイルをダウンロードできます。
Build something already designed, together with the user, then verify it and offer to commit. Use when a design is agreed and the work is ready to write, or when another skill needs the shared build discipline.
Load first when working with any zenku skill. Carries the vocabulary, the two rules, how to find the project's vault and conventions, and the habits for writing into it.
Lay out the current shape so the user can settle a new one — which modules exist, where the seams are, how data flows, and what earlier quests already decided. Use when the user wants to design a feature or a module, work out an interface, decide where a boundary belongs, or when another skill needs a shape agreed before code.
SOC 職業分類に基づく
SKILL.md を表示中
| name | commit |
| description | Analyze uncommitted changes and create grouped conventional commits. |
| disable-model-invocation | true |
Load zenku:codex first, for the project's code roots and checks and for the habit of showing the plan before writing anything.
Run in parallel: git status, git diff --staged, git diff, git log -5 --oneline. Staged and unstaged changes are both fair game — the user may have started staging selectively before invoking this.
Read git log to match the repository's existing style: its scopes, its trailer, whether it writes bodies or bare subjects, whether it hard-wraps. None of that is this skill's to decide, and all of it is visible in the last handful of commits.
Closely related work belongs together even when it spans patterns. Group by the capability being changed; keep code with the doc describing that same change; separate unrelated changes, formatting from logic, and tests from implementation unless they are one thing. Where the project's layout implies a grouping — a unit that does not compile if split — follow it.
Two groupings are this framework's rather than the project's, and neither is visible from the paths:
Conventional commits: type(scope): brief description, optionally a body saying why.
Scopes derive from the area touched, or are omitted for repo-wide changes — follow what git log shows.
Add a co-author or generated-by trailer only if git log already uses one, copying its exact form.
Run the project's **Checks** before committing code. A commit is the last honest place to check. Anything red: say which, and do not commit.
Two exemptions: a spike skips this entirely, because exemption from the quality bar is what made it cheap enough to throw away, and a group with nothing under the code roots has nothing to run.
Always use AskUserQuestion to present the groups, even for a single obvious one. Put the full breakdown with file lists in the question text, as plain text with indentation and dashes — markdown does not render there, and do not add an "Other" option because the system adds it.
Offer "Merge into fewer commits" when there are four or more groups.
Stage exactly the files in the group, never git add -A or git commit -a. A stray file in a commit is invisible until someone reverts it.
Nothing gets committed that the user has not approved in step 5. That holds however obvious the change looks and however recently they approved a previous one.