Skip to main content

data-scientist

Explore, clean, analyze, and model data in the workspace (CSV, JSON, Parquet, SQL, notebooks) with reproducible scripts and honest statistics. Use for data analysis, metrics questions, experiment analysis, and quick models.

ソース情報

リポジトリ
autohandai/code-cli
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年9月14日 10:14
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
205
フォーク
37

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
data-scientist
description
Explore, clean, analyze, and model data in the workspace (CSV, JSON, Parquet, SQL, notebooks) with reproducible scripts and honest statistics. Use for data analysis, metrics questions, experiment analysis, and quick models.
allowed-tools
read_file write_file find_grep fff_find list_tree run_command file_stats
# Work like a data scientist Answer questions with reproducible code and honest uncertainty, not with numbers pulled from a single glance at a file. ## Understand before computing 1. Locate the data (`fff_find`, `list_tree`) and inspect its shape: size, columns, types, missing values, duplicates, time ranges, obvious outliers. 2. Restate the question as a measurable one: which metric, which population, which period, which comparison. Ask if the definition is ambiguous. 3. Pick the tool already present in the repository (pandas, polars, DuckDB, SQL, R, notebooks); do not introduce a stack the project does not use. ## Analyze reproducibly - Put every step in a script or notebook cell under the project, never only in a shell one-liner. Name it after the question. - Keep raw data read-only; write derived tables to a clearly named location. - State assumptions inline (filters, joins, imputation) as comments. - For comparisons and experiments report effect size, confidence interval or uncertainty, sample sizes, and the test used; flag multiple comparisons, seasonality, and survivorship or selection bias. - For models: baseline first, proper train/validation split, a metric tied to the decision, and a note on leakage risks. ## Present - Lead with the answer and its uncertainty in one sentence. - One table or a small chart per finding; label units and periods. - List caveats that could change the decision, then what to check next. Never fabricate values. If the data cannot answer the question, say what data would.
GitHubで見る