globalping-external-checks

name	globalping-external-checks
description	Measure a public endpoint from thousands of probes worldwide - ping, traceroute, DNS, MTR and HTTP from real vantage points on the internet. Use when asked whether the outside world can reach a service, to compare latency between regions, to check DNS propagation, or to answer 'is it us or the internet?'. Public targets only.
license	Apache-2.0
user-invocable	true
metadata	{"openclaw":{"requires":{"env":"[Truncated]"}}}

Globalping External Checks

Every other device-facing tool NetClaw has looks at the network from the inside. This one looks at it from the outside — ~4,800 probes across ~1,390 autonomous systems, measuring toward a public target.

It is the tool for "the router is fine, so why can't anyone reach us?"

Read this first — three ways to get nothing back

These look similar and mean completely different things. Getting them confused is the single failure mode this skill exists to prevent.

Response	What it means	What to say
no_probes_found (422)	The measurement never ran. No probe matched the location filter.	"Nothing was tested — no probes matched that location. Retrying with a broader filter."
finished, 0 of N successful	The target did not answer. Probes ran and got nothing.	"Unreachable from all N probes — this is a real finding."
Target refused before calling	Out of scope. Private/internal address.	"Globalping only measures public endpoints. Use pyATS/multivendor-cli instead."

no_probes_found is NOT an outage. It arrives looking like a failure and tells you nothing whatsoever about the target. Reporting it as unreachability escalates an incident that does not exist. When you see it, say the measurement did not run, widen the location, and try again.

0 of N successful IS a finding, and a valuable one. The measurement succeeded; the answer is "nobody out there could reach it." Report it as the answer, not as an error.

Public targets only — refuse internal ones before calling out

Check the target before every call. Refuse locally, do not let Globalping refuse it for you:

Refuse	Why
10.0.0.0/8, 172.16.0.0/12, 192.168.0.0/16	RFC1918 private
127.0.0.0/8, localhost	Loopback
169.254.0.0/16, fe80::/10	Link-local
fc00::/7	Private IPv6
Any internal-only hostname	Not resolvable from the internet, and discloses naming

Globalping rejects these server-side too — but by then the address or hostname has already been sent to a third party. Refusing locally is a disclosure control, not a correctness one.

When refusing, name the tool to use instead:

"10.0.0.1 is a private address — Globalping measures from the public internet and can't reach it. For internal reachability use pyATS (run_show_command with ping) or multivendor-cli; for a path from this host outward, use gtrace."

Available Tools

Five measurement tools. All take target, locations, limit and context.

1. ping — reachability and latency

python3 $MCP_CALL globalping-mcp ping '{
  "target":"example.com", "locations":"world", "limit":10, "packets":3,
  "context":"Validating external reachability and latency distribution for a public service endpoint during operational troubleshooting."
}'

2. traceroute — the path from a probe toward the target

python3 $MCP_CALL globalping-mcp traceroute '{
  "target":"example.com", "locations":["Japan","Germany"], "limit":2,
  "context":"Identifying the network path and potential failure point toward a public endpoint from two distant regions."
}'

3. dns — resolution and propagation

python3 $MCP_CALL globalping-mcp dns '{
  "target":"example.com", "locations":"world", "limit":15, "queryType":"A",
  "context":"Verifying global DNS propagation consistency for a public domain record following a planned change."
}'

4. mtr — per-hop loss and latency together

python3 $MCP_CALL globalping-mcp mtr '{
  "target":"example.com", "locations":"Singapore", "limit":2,
  "context":"Correlating per-hop packet loss with latency toward a public endpoint to localise a degradation."
}'

5. http — application-layer reachability, status and timing

python3 $MCP_CALL globalping-mcp http '{
  "target":"example.com", "locations":"world", "limit":10, "method":"GET", "path":"/",
  "context":"Confirming HTTP availability and response timing for a public web endpoint across multiple global regions."
}'

6. limits — check the budget before a big investigation

python3 $MCP_CALL globalping-mcp limits '{
  "context":"Reviewing remaining measurement allowance before planning a broad multi-region reachability investigation."
}'

7. locations — are there probes where you want to measure from?

python3 $MCP_CALL globalping-mcp locations '{
  "context":"Checking probe availability in a target region before issuing a narrowly scoped measurement request."
}'

Call this before using a narrow filter. It is the difference between a wasted call and a real answer.

getMeasurement retrieves a prior result by id. help, authStatus, compareLocations and get_more_tools are self-describing — use them if you want, they need no guidance here.

Location syntax

To express	Write
A city within a country	London+UK	+ means AND
Several distinct places	["London","Frankfurt"]	an array
A cloud provider in a region	Amazon+Germany
Diverse global spread	world
An autonomous system	AS3320
A country or region	US, Europe, Greece

"London,UK" does not work. A comma inside a single string fails. Use + for AND, or an array for several locations.

AS13335 never returns probes — even though it appears as an example in Globalping's own tool documentation. Cloudflare hosts no probes. AS15169 (Google) hosts none either. AS3320, AS16509 and AS174 do.

So when an ASN filter returns no_probes_found, the overwhelmingly likely cause is that ASN has no probes, not that the syntax is wrong. Check locations rather than rewriting the filter. Only ~1,390 of the internet's autonomous systems host a probe.

Budget: limit is what you spend

500 probe-measurements/hour with a token (250/hour unauthenticated, per IP). Rolling one-hour window, shared across everything using the token.

The cost of a call equals its probe count. limit: 1 spends 1, limit: 5 spends 5, limit: 20 spends 20. Calling limits to check the budget is free.

So limit is the dial that spends the allowance — choose it for the question being asked:

Question	Suggested limit	Cost
"Is it up?" — quick spot check	3-5	3-5
"Is it slow from certain regions?" — geographic spread	10-20	10-20
"Has DNS propagated globally?" — wide sample genuinely needed	20-30	20-30
Anything above 30	make it a conscious decision	30+

Five 100-probe world tests exhaust the hour. Don't reach for limit: 100 because it is available.

Equally, don't loop where one call would do: ten separate 3-probe pings cost the same 30 units as one 30-probe ping, but give you ten small unattributed samples instead of one broad comparable set. Prefer one right-sized call.

Call limits first before a big investigation — it costs nothing and tells you what you have.

Always attribute results to a location

Every latency, loss and resolver figure must be reported with the probe location that produced it. Geographic variance is the entire reason to use this tool; an unattributed average destroys the signal.

Never generalise one probe into a regional claim. One probe in Frankfurt is one probe in Frankfurt, not "Europe".

Good: "Reachable from 9 of 10 probes. 12ms from Frankfurt, 18ms from London, 210ms from São Paulo, timeout from Sydney."

Bad: "Average latency 68ms." — hides that one region is broken.

DNS: report disagreement as a split

Resolvers disagreeing is the answer during a propagation check. Report the split, never an average or a single winner.

Good: "11 of 15 probes return the new address (203.0.113.10); 4 still return the old one (198.51.100.5) — Singapore, Mumbai, Sydney, Tokyo. Propagation is incomplete in APAC."

When to use something else

Question	Tool
"Can the outside world reach this, right now, from many places?"	this skill
"Is this worse than last week? What's the trend?"	ThousandEyes — continuous, baselined, paid
"What path does traffic take from this host outward?"	gtrace — one vantage point, ours
"Is the device/interface/protocol itself healthy?"	pyATS, multivendor-cli, SuzieQ

Globalping is ad-hoc and free with ~4,800 vantage points. It cannot tell you whether today is worse than last Tuesday — it holds no history. If the question involves a baseline, it is a ThousandEyes question.

Measurement, not scanning

Use this to measure infrastructure the operator runs. Do not sweep, enumerate, or probe third-party infrastructure, and do not use it to survey hosts the operator has no responsibility for. If a request looks like reconnaissance of somebody else's estate rather than validation of the operator's own service, say so and stop.

About the context field

Every tool requires a context argument: a 15-25 word, third-person description of why the call is being made. Globalping states it is used for "analytics and user intent tracking".

This text leaves NetClaw and reaches a third party. Keep it generic and task-shaped:

• Never include: customer or company names, internal hostnames, IP addressing, ticket or change numbers, topology detail, or anything about the operator's business.
• Do include: the shape of the task only — "validating external reachability", "verifying DNS propagation", "comparing regional latency".

The examples in this skill are all safe to reuse verbatim.

(For reference: the server currently accepts calls with context omitted despite marking it required. Send it anyway — it is the documented contract, and relying on unenforced behaviour would break every call at once if that changed.)

One more credential note

limits output includes a short fragment of the token (first 8 characters after a prefix). Don't paste raw limits output into a ticket, chat channel, or anywhere public.