メニュー
Conduct systematic research with confidence scoring, source validation, and structured reporting for technology decisions and codebase analysis. Use for complex research tasks, technology selection, or best practice discovery.
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
直接コマンドでは確認用 Prompt が省略されます。実行前にソースを確認してください。
npx skills add https://github.com/AutumnsGrove/Lattice --skill research-strategyコマンドは1行のまま表示されます。コピー前に横へスクロールして全体を確認してください。
ローカルで確認しますか？SkillsMP が現在取得できるファイルをダウンロードできます。
SKILL.md を表示中
| name | research-strategy |
| description | Conduct systematic research with confidence scoring, source validation, and structured reporting for technology decisions and codebase analysis. Use for complex research tasks, technology selection, or best practice discovery. |
Activate this skill when:
Primary Sources (Highest priority)
Authoritative Sources
Community Sources
Experimental Sources (Use with caution)
Assign to ALL findings:
| Level | Range | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| HIGH | 90-100% | Multiple authoritative sources agree, widely adopted |
| MEDIUM | 60-89% | Good documentation, some adoption, minor disagreements |
| LOW | 30-59% | Limited sources, conflicting information |
| SPECULATIVE | <30% | Educated guess, no direct sources |
# Research Report: [Topic]
## Executive Summary
[2-3 paragraphs: key findings, recommendation, confidence]
## Research Questions
1. [Question 1]
2. [Question 2]
## Key Findings
### Finding 1: [Title]
**Confidence**: HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW
**Sources**: [List with links]
[Detailed explanation]
**Implications**: [How this affects decisions]
## Comparative Analysis
| Aspect | Option A | Option B |
|--------|----------|----------|
| Performance | Details | Details |
| Learning Curve | Details | Details |
## Best Practices
1. **[Practice]**: Why, Source, Adoption level
## Risks and Concerns
- **Risk**: Severity, Likelihood, Mitigation
## Knowledge Gaps
- **Gap**: Impact, How to address
## Recommendations
[Clear, actionable recommendations with confidence levels]
## Overview
- Purpose: [One sentence]
- Maturity: Stable/Beta/Experimental
- Last commit: [Date]
- License: [Type]
## Technical Assessment
- Performance: [Benchmarks]
- Bundle Size: [KB]
- Dependencies: [Count, quality]
## Developer Experience
- Documentation: Excellent/Good/Fair/Poor
- TypeScript: Built-in/DefinitelyTyped/None
- Learning Curve: Steep/Moderate/Gentle
## Verdict
**Recommendation**: Use/Don't Use/Conditional
**Confidence**: HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW
**When to Use**: [Scenarios]
**When to Avoid**: [Scenarios]
For each topic, answer:
Current State
Best Practices
Trade-offs
Risks
❌ Single Source Syndrome
❌ Premature Implementation
❌ Missing Confidence Levels
❌ Outdated Information
See AgentUsage/research_workflow.md for complete documentation including:
Move mountains with patient strength. Wake from hibernation, gather what must move, carry it carefully, hibernate to verify, and wake again to confirm. Use when migrating anything — data, components, icons, documents, formats, or systems.
Gather scattered ideas into organized GitHub issues. The bee collects pollen from every flower, checks if the hive already has it, and carefully deposits new work in the comb for later. Never edits code—only organizes the work ahead. Use when creating issues from TODOs or planning work.
Better Auth framework reference — configuration, security, rate limiting, sessions, plugins, and production hardening. Use when configuring Better Auth, auditing auth security, adding plugins, or troubleshooting Heartwood.