メニュー
Review how an implementation diverged from its approved plan. Forks a clean-context agent over the plan and the diff to surface requirements drift and warranted follow-ups. Use at finish time or before opening a PR.
デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。
インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
直接コマンドでは確認用 Prompt が省略されます。実行前にソースを確認してください。
npx skills add https://github.com/bendrucker/claude --skill plan-reviewコマンドは1行のまま表示されます。コピー前に横へスクロールして全体を確認してください。
ローカルで確認しますか？SkillsMP が現在取得できるファイルをダウンロードできます。
SKILL.md を表示中
Working with GitLab merge requests via glab. Use when creating, updating, reviewing, or merging MRs, enabling auto-merge or merge trains, requesting or re-requesting reviewers, handling approvals, or working review threads, discussions, and draft notes. Load before running any `glab mr` or MR-mutating `glab api` command.
Create a pull request, merge request, or change request with proper formatting and content guidelines. Invoke when the user wants to create, open, or submit a PR, MR, or CR, including after committing changes.
Update a pull request or merge request body to reflect the current state of changes. Use when a PR/MR has evolved through additional commits and the body needs to reflect what will be merged.
| name | plan:review |
| description | Review how an implementation diverged from its approved plan. Forks a clean-context agent over the plan and the diff to surface requirements drift and warranted follow-ups. Use at finish time or before opening a PR. |
| allowed-tools | ["Agent"] |
Compare what shipped against the plan that was approved. Surface where the implementation drifted and what follow-ups that warrants.
The review runs in a forked agent with a clean context. An implementing session accumulates a justification for every departure as it happens, so drift goes unseen from inside it. A reviewer handed only the plan and the diff judges the delta cold. That outside view is the point: re-emphasizing the same prompt in the implementing context would not substitute for it.
Claude Code writes the approved plan to a file under ~/.claude/plans/ and injects that file's path into the session when plan mode exits. That file is the plan. Use the path already in this session's context. If none was injected, the session built against no approved plan and there is nothing to review: say so and stop.
Dispatch a background Agent: analyst if your available agent types list it, otherwise general-purpose. The review reads two documents and reports. It needs no tool an analyst lacks, and an analyst spawn arrives without the skill catalog a general-purpose one carries. Never fork: a fork inherits this session's context and defeats the outside view. The agent starts clean and has no idea where this skill lives, so hand it absolute paths: the plan file, and the rubric references/divergence.md resolved against this skill's base directory (that directory is in your context). A bare relative path resolves against the repo root in the agent's context and misses. Tell it to:
gh pr view --json baseRefName -q .baseRefName). With no PR yet, fall back to the repository default (gh repo view --json defaultBranchRef -q .defaultBranchRef.name). Don't assume main: a stacked branch targets its parent. Capture both committed and uncommitted work: git diff <base>...HEAD, plus git diff HEAD and git status --short for anything not yet committed. The review can run mid-implementation, so uncommitted changes are in scope.Run it on a cheaper model when one is set. The review reasons over two documents, so it does not need the top tier.
Relay the agent's report: the divergences and their classification, the drift, the ranked follow-ups (fix-before-merge against later), and the verdict. Add nothing of your own. The value is the outside view, not a second opinion filtered back through this context.