utp-utopia-analysis

name	utp - Utopia Analysis
description	Systematically construct and examine the best possible outcome — what would ideal actually look like, and what would it take to get there?
output	{"format":"prose"}

Utopia Analysis

Input: $ARGUMENTS

---

Step 1: DEFINE THE DOMAIN

What domain are we imagining the ideal for?

DOMAIN: [what area of life, society, technology, etc.]
SCOPE: [individual / organizational / societal / global]

---

Step 2: CONSTRUCT THE IDEAL

Without constraints, describe the best possible state:

A. What does it look like?

1. What is the daily experience of people in this ideal state?
2. What problems have been solved?
3. What capabilities exist?
4. What relationships and structures exist?
5. What do people spend their time on?

B. What values does it embody?

1. What is maximized?
2. What is minimized?
3. What tensions have been resolved, and how?
4. What trade-offs no longer exist?

C. What is conspicuously absent?

1. What current problems don't exist?
2. What current constraints are removed?
3. What current conflicts are resolved?

---

Step 3: STRESS TEST THE UTOPIA

Every utopia has failure modes. Check for:

1. Hidden costs — What does this ideal require that isn't obvious?
2. Value conflicts — Whose values does this utopia reflect? Whose does it exclude?
3. Stability — Would this state be self-maintaining or would it decay?
4. Diversity — Does this utopia work for everyone or only some people?
5. Stagnation — Without problems to solve, what drives growth and purpose?
6. Transition violence — What would getting here cost?
7. Unintended consequences — What new problems does solving old ones create?

---

Step 4: EXTRACT THE ACTIONABLE

The value of utopia analysis isn't the utopia — it's what it reveals about current priorities.

1. Direction — Which direction should we move? (Even if we can't arrive)
2. Next milestone — What is the nearest achievable step toward this ideal?
3. Neglected dimensions — What aspects of the ideal are we not working on at all?
4. False constraints — What did the utopia exercise reveal we're treating as fixed that isn't?
5. Real constraints — What genuinely cannot change?

---

Step 5: OUTPUT

UTOPIA ANALYSIS:

Domain: [area]

The ideal state:
[2-3 sentence description of the utopia]

Key features:
- [feature 1]
- [feature 2]
- [feature 3]

Stress test findings:
- [vulnerability 1]
- [vulnerability 2]

What the utopia reveals about NOW:
- Direction to move: [which way]
- Nearest milestone: [achievable next step]
- Neglected dimension: [what we're ignoring]
- False constraint: [what we think is fixed but isn't]

Most useful insight: [the single most actionable thing this analysis produced]

---

Integration

Use with:

• /dys -> Contrast with worst-case analysis
• /fut -> Ground the utopia in realistic timeframes
• /gop -> Identify good outcomes on the path
• /br -> Work backward from the ideal
• /eth -> Examine the ethical dimensions of the ideal