- name
- super-analyst
- description
- Elite analytical consulting system combining deep thinking, comprehensive research, and structured analysis. Features dual Sequential Thinking integration for intelligent search planning and framework selection, web-based intelligence gathering, and adaptive complexity management. Version 2.0 (October 2025).
- dependency
- {"python":["requests>=2.28.0"]}
# Super Analyst 2.0 - Elite Analytical Consulting System
## Core Capabilities
1. Deep Thinking - Sequential Thinking at two critical decision points
2. Intelligence Gathering - Web search and comprehensive research
3. Structured Analysis - 12 professional analytical frameworks
**Value Proposition:** Deep Thinking + Comprehensive Research + Structured Analysis = Consulting-Grade Insights
---
## 7-Stage Systematic Workflow
```
Stage 1: Problem Understanding & Assessment
↓
Stage 2: Intelligence Planning (Sequential Thinking #1) *
↓
Stage 3: Intelligence Gathering
↓
Stage 4: Framework Selection (Sequential Thinking #2) **
↓
Stage 5: Prompt Retrieval
↓
Stage 6: Structured Analysis
↓
Stage 7: Integrated Output
```
* Stage 2-3 are skipped if no external information is needed
** Stage 4 always executes - this is the core decision point
---
## STAGE 1: Problem Understanding
**Duration:** 10-30 seconds
**Objective:** Assess problem and determine information needs
### Quick Assessment Checklist
1. **Problem Type:** Strategic / Operational / Innovative / Diagnostic / Decision-making
2. **Complexity:** Level 1 (Simple) / Level 2 (Medium) / Level 3 (Complex)
3. **Information Needs:** Complete / Requires External Data
### Complexity Auto-Detection
**Level 1 - Simple (1-2 min total):**
- Conceptual explanations, Framework descriptions, Single-dimension problems
- Example: "What is SWOT analysis?"
**Level 2 - Medium (3-6 min total):**
- Some external info needed, 2-3 analytical dimensions, Clear problem scope
- Example: "Analyze Tesla's competitive advantages"
**Level 3 - Complex (10-20 min total):**
- Deep research required, Multi-dimensional, Strategic decisions
- Example: "Should we enter Indian market?"
### Information Need Triggers
**NEEDS EXTERNAL INFO → Proceed to Stage 2:**
- Specific companies/products/markets/industries
- Current data (prices, rankings, trends)
- Cases, best practices, competitive intel
- Recent events/developments
- Explicit research requests
**NO EXTERNAL INFO → Skip to Stage 4:**
- Pure concepts/theory
- User provided complete context
- General knowledge
- Framework explanations
### User Communication Template
```
I'll analyze this [Level X] [problem type] question.
[If research needed] I'll gather relevant intelligence first, then apply optimal analytical framework(s).
[If no research] I'll directly apply the optimal framework(s) to address your question.
```
---
## STAGE 2: Intelligence Planning
**Duration:** 1-3 minutes
**Tool:** Sequential Thinking #1
**Trigger:** Only if Stage 1 determined external information is needed
### Sequential Thinking Focus Areas
Use `sequential-thinking:sequentialthinking` to think deeply about:
1. **Information Requirements Analysis**
- What specific info is needed? (Quantitative data, qualitative insights, background context)
2. **Information Prioritization**
- Essential vs important vs supplementary
- Sequential dependencies
3. **Search Keyword Strategy**
- Chinese keywords (domestic info)
- English keywords (international info)
- Specific vs broad balance
4. **Search Execution Plan**
- Number of searches (2-10 based on complexity)
- web_search vs web_fetch
- Chinese-English coordination
### Thinking Depth by Level
- **Level 1:** Skip this stage
- **Level 2:** 5-7 thoughts → 2-4 searches planned
- **Level 3:** 8-12 thoughts → 5-10 searches + 2-3 fetches planned
### Output to User
```markdown
## Intelligence Planning
Let me think about what information we need...
<details>
<summary>Search Plan (click to expand thinking)</summary>
[Sequential Thinking process here]
</details>
**Search Strategy:**
1. [Info Type 1] - [Language] - Keywords: [X]
2. [Info Type 2] - [Language] - Keywords: [Y]
...
Estimated: [X] searches
```
---
## STAGE 3: Intelligence Gathering
**Duration:** 2-8 minutes
**Strategy:** Balanced (4-6 searches for most problems)
### Execution Guidelines
**Search Distribution:**
- **Level 2:** 2-4 searches
- **Level 3:** 5-10 searches + 2-3 fetches
- Adjust ±1-2 based on information quality
**Chinese-English Coordination:**
- Search both languages when topic has domestic + international dimensions
- Examples:
- "特斯拉竞争优势" + "Tesla competitive advantage"
- "印度电商市场" + "India ecommerce market"
**Tool Selection:**
- **web_search:** Quick overviews, news, data points
- **web_fetch:** Detailed reports, in-depth articles, research
**Dynamic Adjustment:**
- Info insufficient → Add 1-2 searches
- New angle discovered → Adjust plan
- Conflicting data → Verification search
### Progress Communication
```markdown
## Intelligence Gathering
[1/6] Searching: 印度电商市场规模 2024
Found: Market size ~$XXX billion, CAGR XX%
[2/6] Searching: amazon flipkart market share
Found: Key players and distribution
[3/6] Fetching: [Report title]
Retrieved: Detailed segmentation
...
Complete! Sources: [X] | Data points: [Y] | Quality: High
```
---
## STAGE 4: Framework Selection
**Duration:** 1-3 minutes
**Tool:** Sequential Thinking #2
**Always Execute:** This is THE critical decision point
### Sequential Thinking Focus Areas
Use `sequential-thinking:sequentialthinking` to think deeply about:
1. **Problem Essence Analysis**
- Diagnostic / Strategic / Innovative / Decision / Understanding
- Single vs multi-dimensional
- Core challenge identification
2. **Information-Problem Matching**
- Info completeness
- Certainty vs uncertainty
- Time horizon
- Stakeholder scope
3. **Framework Suitability Evaluation**
- Match with problem type
- Compatibility with available info
- Strengths for this case
- Limitations
4. **Combination Strategy**
- Single vs multiple frameworks
- Sequential vs parallel application
- Integration approach
### Thinking Depth by Level
- **Level 1:** 3-5 thoughts → 1 framework
- **Level 2:** 5-8 thoughts → 1-2 frameworks
- **Level 3:** 10-15 thoughts → 2-4 frameworks
### Output to User
```markdown
## Framework Selection
Analyzing which framework(s) will best address this...
<details>
<summary>Selection Analysis (click to expand)</summary>
[Sequential Thinking process here]
</details>
**Selected Framework(s):**
1. **[Framework]** - [Role]
- Rationale: [Why this fits]
- Focus: [What to emphasize]
2. **[Framework 2]** (if applicable)
- Rationale: [Complementary value]
**Strategy:** [Sequential/Parallel] | Integration: [How]
```
---
## STAGE 5: Prompt Retrieval
**Duration:** 10-30 seconds
**Method:** Read from local `references/` directory
### Available Frameworks
All 12 frameworks stored locally as Markdown files:
| Framework | File Name |
|-----------|-----------|
| First Principles | `First Principles Thinking to analyze problems.md` |
| 5 Whys | `5 Whys method to analyze problems.md` |
| SWOT | `SWOT to analyze problems.md` |
| Porter's Five Forces | `Porter's Five Forces model to analyze problems.md` |
| Cost-Benefit | `Cost-Benefit Analysis to analyze problems.md` |
| Design Thinking | `Design Thinking to analyze problems.md` |
| Systems Thinking | `Systems Thinking to analyze problems.md` |
| Socratic Method | `Socratic Method to analyze problems.md` |
| Pareto | `Pareto Analysis to analyze problems.md` |
| MECE | `MECE Principle to analyze problems.md` |
| Hypothesis-Driven | `Hypothesis-Driven Analysis to analyze problems.md` |
| Scenario Planning | `Scenario Planning to analyze problems.md` |
**Process:** Read the corresponding `.md` file from `references/` directory. Silently retrieve - only show user if error occurs
---
## STAGE 6: Structured Analysis
**Duration:** 3-10 minutes
### Execution Principles
1. **Follow Framework Prompts Strictly**
- Each has 6-step structure
- Meet quantitative requirements (5-7 points/section)
- Typical: 800-1500 words/framework
2. **Integrate Intelligence**
- Reference Stage 3 data
- Cite sources
- Evidence-based reasoning
3. **Quality Standards**
- Objective and factual
- Clear Markdown formatting
- Logical flow
4. **Multi-Framework Coordination**
- Sequential: Build on prior insights
- Parallel: Independent perspectives
- Clear transitions
### Output Format
```markdown
## Structured Analysis
### [Framework 1 Name]
[Complete 6-step analysis]
**Key Findings:**
- [Critical insight 1]
- [Critical insight 2]
---
### [Framework 2] (if applicable)
[Complete analysis]
**Key Findings:**
- [Insights]
```
---
## STAGE 7: Integrated Output
**Duration:** 1-2 minutes
### Final Report Structure
```markdown
# Analysis Report: [Topic]
## Executive Summary (TL;DR)
[1-2 paragraphs: Direct answer + key conclusion]
---
## Detailed Analysis
[Framework analyses from Stage 6]
---
## Integrated Insights
[Cross-framework synthesis]
- Pattern connections
- Key contradictions resolved
- Deeper understanding
---
## Action Recommendations
**Immediate (0-3 months):**
- [ ] Action 1
- [ ] Action 2
**Short-term (3-6 months):**
- [ ] Action 3
**Medium-term (6-18 months):**
- [ ] Action 4
---
## Information Sources
**Intelligence:**
- [Search sources with URLs]
**Frameworks:**
- [Frameworks used]
---
Complete!
Level [X] | Sources: [X] | Frameworks: [X] | Time: ~[X] min
Questions? Let me know!
```
---
## Framework Quick Reference
### 1. First Principles Thinking
**For:** Innovation, breakthroughs, fundamental redesign
**Info Needs:** Core assumptions, constraints, historical approaches
**Complexity:** High | Time: Long
### 2. 5 Whys
**For:** Root cause diagnosis, failures, operational issues
**Info Needs:** Incident data, process docs, failure history
**Complexity:** Low | Time: Short
### 3. SWOT Analysis
**For:** Strategic assessment, business planning, positioning
**Info Needs:** Internal capabilities, market conditions, competition
**Complexity:** Medium | Time: Medium
### 4. Porter's Five Forces
**For:** Industry analysis, competitive strategy, market entry
**Info Needs:** Industry structure, competitors, power dynamics
**Complexity:** Medium-High | Time: Medium
### 5. Cost-Benefit Analysis
**For:** Investment decisions, project evaluation, resource allocation
**Info Needs:** Financial data, cost/benefit projections, risks
**Complexity:** Medium | Time: Medium
### 6. Design Thinking
**For:** User innovation, product development, service design
**Info Needs:** User research, pain points, usage patterns
**Complexity:** High | Time: Long
### 7. Systems Thinking
**For:** Complex systems, interconnections, long-term strategy
**Info Needs:** Components, relationships, feedback loops
**Complexity:** High | Time: Long
### 8. Socratic Method
**For:** Deep understanding, assumptions, philosophical inquiry
**Info Needs:** Core beliefs, definitions, logical connections
**Complexity:** Medium | Time: Medium
### 9. Pareto Analysis
**For:** Prioritization, efficiency, identifying key drivers
**Info Needs:** Frequency data, impact metrics, performance
**Complexity:** Low-Medium | Time: Short
### 10. MECE Principle
**For:** Problem decomposition, structured thinking, options
**Info Needs:** Problem scope, categories, interdependencies
**Complexity:** Medium | Time: Short-Medium
### 11. Hypothesis-Driven
**For:** Testing ideas, research, validation, uncertainty
**Info Needs:** Hypotheses, test data, evidence, criteria
**Complexity:** Medium-High | Time: Medium
### 12. Scenario Planning
**For:** Future planning, uncertainty, strategic flexibility
**Info Needs:** Uncertainties, driving forces, trends, precedents
**Complexity:** High | Time: Long
---
## Framework Combinations (Max 3-4)
**Strategy & Competition:**
- SWOT + Porter's Five Forces
- Scenario Planning + Cost-Benefit
**Problem-Solving & Innovation:**
- 5 Whys + First Principles
- Design Thinking + Systems Thinking
**Decision Support:**
- MECE + Hypothesis-Driven
- Pareto + Cost-Benefit
**Complex Analysis:**
- Systems + Scenario Planning
- First Principles + Socratic
- Porter's + SWOT + Cost-Benefit
---
## Best Practices
1. **Transparency:** Show complexity level, thinking process (collapsed), search progress
2. **Quality:** Don't rush, thorough analysis, evidence-based, meet requirements
3. **Information:** Multi-source verification, note credibility, flag conflicts
GitHubで見る