メニュー
当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 组织正文与附录/补充材料、决定哪些内容进正文哪些进附录时调用。给出按"决定性"划分正文与附录的原则、冗长证明与额外仿真的安置、补充材料/多媒体附件的组织与命名、以及配合双盲的匿名化，帮助控制/自动化/模式识别方向的中文长文在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的篇幅与体例约束下保持正文紧凑而证据完整。
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Use when preparing the accountability artifacts that accompany an ACM FAccT paper — datasheets for datasets, model cards, data statements, audit and impact-assessment documentation, and released code/data — since FAccT's culture centers documentation and accountability infrastructure rather than a formal ACM artifact-badging track; covers what makes each genre credible, anonymized-review versus public-release versions, and consistency with the paper's harm claims.
Use when drafting ACM FAccT author responses — the short factual-correction rebuttal after preliminary reviews, and, distinctively for the 2026-new process, the Revise-and-resubmit round where you address Area-Chair-prioritized concerns from a mixed CS+law+social-science panel, map each to a concrete change, and survive a re-review while keeping mutual anonymity.
Use when preparing an accepted ACM FAccT paper for camera-ready — de-anonymizing and adding the withheld Positionality/Acknowledgements statements, switching to the acmart sigconf proceedings format, ACM metadata (DOI, ORCID, CCS concepts, rights), the two-round camera-ready calendar for Accept vs Revise papers, ACM Open Access, finalizing datasheets/model cards, and integrating required changes without scope creep.
Use when designing or auditing ACM FAccT empirical work — quantitative fairness audits with disaggregated metrics and fair baselines, qualitative and participatory studies with coding and reflexivity, mixed-methods designs, sound handling of protected attributes and proxies, consent and IRB for human-subjects and community-facing work, and matching evidence to the shape of a fairness/accountability/transparency claim.
Use when positioning an ACM FAccT submission across its many disciplinary lanes — algorithmic fairness/ML, HCI, law and policy, STS and critical theory, and prior FAccT/FAT* proceedings — writing delta-first contrast that a mixed reviewer pool will accept, citing borrowed constructs to their real origin, keeping self-citations mutually anonymous, and declaring overlap with workshops, preprints, and prior versions.
Use when strengthening ACM FAccT transparency and reproducibility — releasing code, data, and analysis for quantitative audits; documenting datasets and models with datasheets, model cards, and data statements; making qualitative and participatory work auditable without breaking confidentiality; pinning provenance for scraped and model-generated data; and keeping the paper, the supplementary material, and any released artifact consistent.
| name | aas-supplementary |
| description | 当你在为《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 组织正文与附录/补充材料、决定哪些内容进正文哪些进附录时调用。给出按"决定性"划分正文与附录的原则、冗长证明与额外仿真的安置、补充材料/多媒体附件的组织与命名、以及配合双盲的匿名化，帮助控制/自动化/模式识别方向的中文长文在 Acta Automatica Sinica 的篇幅与体例约束下保持正文紧凑而证据完整。 |
本技能帮你决定投向《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 的稿件中，哪些内容留在正文、哪些
移入附录或补充材料。AAS 有综述长文传统但正文仍应紧凑，冗长证明与额外实验宜移入附录。以下方法于
2026-07-09 核验框架（见 resources/official-source-map.md）；补充材料具体形式以官网当期为准
（待核实）。
判断标准是**"读者理解主贡献是否必需"**：
| 内容 | 位置 | 理由 |
|---|---|---|
| 主定理与核心证明思路 | 正文 | 理解贡献必需 |
| 冗长的完整证明推导 | 附录 | 支撑但不打断主线 |
| 关键实验与主结果 | 正文 | 支撑贡献 |
| 补充仿真、额外场景、参数扫描 | 附录/补充 | 增强但非核心 |
| 系统模型完整推导 | 视情况 | 核心入正文，细节入附录 |
| 大表、超参全表 | 附录 | 正文放摘要版 |
aas-submission）。[决定性] 每块内容问：理解主贡献是否必需？必需→正文，否则→附录
[正文紧凑] 冗长证明/额外实验是否已移出，主线是否清晰？
[附录完整] 完整证明/补充实验/超参全表是否齐备？
[附件] 视频/代码/数据命名清晰、与正文对应？
[匿名] 附录与附件是否无身份泄露？
[引用衔接] 正文是否指明"详见附录/补充"？
[待核实] 本刊补充材料具体形式与上限：待核实
综述栏目常有大量对比数据与分类明细，补充材料的组织与论文稿不同：
| 内容 | 位置 | 说明 |
|---|---|---|
| 核心分类框架图/表 | 正文 | 综述的骨架，必须在正文 |
| 完整方法对比大表 | 附录 | 正文放精简版，附录放全表 |
| 各方法参数/数据集清单 | 附录 | 便于读者查阅，不打断正文 |
| 时间线/演化图 | 视情况 | 关键脉络入正文，细节入附录 |
| 检索与纳入标准 | 附录 | 说明综述的文献筛选方法，增强可信度 |
综述的附录还可包含"文献检索策略"（数据库、关键词、时间范围、纳入/排除标准），这是让综述可复现、 显严谨的重要部分。
定稿前做一次一致性核对，避免正文引用与附录内容脱节：
[引用一致] 正文每个"详见附录X"都能在附录找到对应内容？
[编号一致] 附录章节/图表/式编号与正文引用一致？
[无重复] 附录未简单重复正文内容？
[无孤儿] 附录每块内容都被正文引用到？
[匿名一致] 附录与附件均无身份泄露？
aas-camera-ready）确认最终见刊版与补充材料的引用编号仍然一致。《自动化学报》(Acta Automatica Sinica, AAS) 允许把工作讲透，但正文应服务于清晰传达可数贡献。用
附录/补充材料承接细节，既满足外审对严谨性的要求，又保持正文可读。与 aas-experiments、
aas-writing-style、aas-reproducibility 联动，确保正文—附录划分一致、复现材料与附录呼应，让
Acta Automatica Sinica 的外审既能看到紧凑主线，又能查到完整证据。