en-agrienv-journal-workflow

name

en-agrienv-journal-workflow

description

Use when deciding which English agriculture / environment / earth-science journal skill to invoke next, comparing fit across the 30-journal agriculture-and-environment roadmap, or routing a manuscript before venue-specific re-framing. Routes by sub-field (agronomy / plant / soil / food / environment / earth / climate), contribution type, and evidence shape (field trial / lab assay / observational survey / model / dataset).

Agriculture & environment journal workflow (en-agrienv-journal-workflow)

Purpose

This is the routing skill for the agriculture-and-environment bundle. It does not replace a single-journal profile; it first classifies the manuscript by sub-field, contribution type, and evidence shape, then routes into the matching per-journal skill for fit and re-framing. It is a sibling to en-natsci-journal-workflow (natural science) and en-engtech-journal-workflow (engineering).

Ask four things first

1. Sub-field: crop/agronomy, plant biology, soil science, food science, ecosystem/environmental science, pollution/health, climate/atmosphere, hydrology/water, ocean/limnology, or solid-earth geoscience?
2. Contribution type: a mechanism, a field/management result, a synthesis/review, a model or projection, a new dataset/data product, or a methods/measurement advance?
3. Evidence shape: controlled field trial, glasshouse/lab assay, observational or monitoring survey, remote sensing, long-term record, process/earth-system model, or a documented public dataset?
4. Audience breadth: broad significance (a Nature Portfolio title), a whole sub-field (a society flagship), or a specialist community?

Pre-routing evidence gates

Before naming a journal, classify the manuscript through these gates. A weak gate does not always mean "do not submit"; it usually means route down to a specialist venue, reframe the claim, or fix the evidence before testing a higher-prestige venue.

Gate	Pass signal	If weak
Contribution	A mechanism, management implication, method, projection, or dataset that transfers beyond the study site	Reframe as a local case study, technical note, or specialist-field result
Evidence strength	Replicated sites/seasons/systems, transparent uncertainty, and controls matched to the claim	Do not route to broad Nature/society flagships; strengthen replication first
Scale match	Claim scale matches the evidence scale: plot, field, landscape, regional, global, or dataset	Narrow the title/abstract and select a venue that accepts the actual scale
Data/code readiness	Data, code, model configuration, and metadata can be deposited or shared under field norms	Treat deposition as a blocker for ESSD, earth-system, hydrology, and reuse claims
Compliance	Permits, ethics, biosafety, field-site permissions, and competing-interest disclosures are known	Pause final routing until the single-journal checklist can verify requirements

Evidence-shape escalation

• Single site-year field trial: usually specialist agronomy/crop venue; do not pitch as general food-security evidence without multi-site or mechanistic support.
• Multi-site or multi-season field trial: can support field flagship routing if management implications and uncertainty are explicit.
• Lab/glasshouse mechanism: plant or soil mechanism venues; needs field or ecological validation before claiming landscape or management impact.
• Remote sensing / monitoring survey: route by validation and generalizability; benchmark against independent observations and document processing code.
• Process or earth-system model: route by the model contribution, sensitivity analysis, and reproducibility package, not only by the application region.
• Dataset/data product: earth-system-science-data only when the dataset itself is the product, has persistent identifiers, rich metadata, and a public archive.

Quick routing

Manuscript signature	Prefer skill
Food-systems advance with broad significance	nature-food
Plant-science advance, broad and high-impact	nature-plants
Fundamental plant biology / physiology / ecology	new-phytologist / the-plant-journal
Authoritative plant-biology review	annual-review-of-plant-biology
Crop yield, agronomy, cropping-system field research	field-crops-research / agronomy-for-sustainable-development
Agroecosystem nutrient/GHG/biodiversity at field-to-landscape scale	agriculture-ecosystems-and-environment
Soil biology, biogeochemistry, soil carbon/microbiome	soil-biology-and-biochemistry
Food chemistry / composition / safety	food-chemistry
Food-technology trends and synthesis	trends-in-food-science-and-technology
Climate-change impacts on ecosystems/biota	global-change-biology
Human-exposure environmental health	environment-international / environmental-health-perspectives
Sustainability, circular economy, cleaner production	journal-of-cleaner-production / resources-conservation-and-recycling
Authoritative environment & resources review	annual-review-of-environment-and-resources
Environmental contamination / ecotoxicology	environmental-pollution
Broad earth/environment advance, OA	communications-earth-and-environment
Climate dynamics / variability	journal-of-climate
New, documented public dataset	earth-system-science-data
Catchment / surface / groundwater hydrology	journal-of-hydrology /

Sibling-journal disambiguation

Confusable targets	Decision rule
nature-food vs field-crops-research	Nature Food wants food-systems significance and transdisciplinary reach; FCR wants a rigorous crop/agronomy field result.
new-phytologist vs the-plant-journal	New Phytologist favors plant ecology/physiology/interactions breadth; The Plant Journal favors molecular/cellular plant biology with mechanism. Re-check current scopes.
journal-of-hydrology vs water-resources-research	WRR (AGU) favors fundamental water-science methodology/theory; Journal of Hydrology spans process, observational, and applied hydrology more broadly.
agriculture-ecosystems-and-environment vs soil-biology-and-biochemistry	AEE emphasizes field-to-landscape agroecosystem outcomes; SBB emphasizes soil-process mechanism and soil biota.
global-change-biology vs agriculture-ecosystems-and-environment	GCB needs a global-change framing and biological response; AEE needs an agroecosystem-management framing.
Nature Portfolio (nature-food/nature-plants/communications-earth-and-environment) vs society flagships	Nature titles need broad significance and framing; a complete sub-field result routes to the society/specialist journal.
earth-system-science-data vs an analysis journal	ESSD is for the dataset itself (documented, publicly deposited with a DOI); the scientific analysis of that data belongs in an analysis journal.
environment-international / environmental-health-perspectives vs pollution journals	Human-exposure or health-risk inference routes to the health journals; contaminant behavior, remediation, or ecotoxicology routes to the pollution/environmental-process venues.
journal-of-climate vs agricultural-and-forest-meteorology	Climate dynamics and variability route to Journal of Climate; land-atmosphere fluxes, crop/forest microclimate, and agro-meteorological applications route to AFM.
global-biogeochemical-cycles vs global-change-biology

Decision rules

• Name the advance, not the site. "We measured X at our site" is not a contribution unless it yields a generalizable mechanism, management result, projection, or dataset.
• Field evidence discipline. Field/observational claims need adequate replication, controls, and uncertainty; a single site-year or unreplicated trial is a common reject at the agronomy and ecology venues.
• Data deposition is a gate, not a nicety. Earth-science and environmental venues increasingly mandate FAIR data/code deposition; data journals (ESSD) require the public dataset itself. Sort this before submission.
• Review vs. primary. Annual Review titles and the synthesis-leaning venues are largely invited/scoped — do not route an unsolicited primary-data paper there without checking scope.
• Scale and framing. Plot/lab, field, landscape, regional, and global results route to different venues; match the claim's scale to the journal's audience.
• Health, policy, and management claims need the right endpoint. Do not route a contaminant-detection paper as environmental health unless exposure/outcome inference is actually measured; do not route a sustainability paper as policy unless a decision, intervention, or system boundary is specified.
• Always enter the single-journal skill's official-submission checklist before submitting; never rely on a stale template.

Handoff protocol

After routing, hand off only the minimum needed context to the single-journal skill:

• the strongest claim the evidence can honestly support;
• the rejected broader claim, if any, and why it was narrowed;
• the evidence shape and weakest gate from the table above;
• the one official requirement most likely to block submission;
• the alternative venue to keep warm if the first-choice fit fails.

Output format

[Top journal skill] <skill-name>
[Alt 1] <skill-name> (reason)
[Alt 2] <skill-name> (reason)
[Do not submit to] <journal> (one-line mismatch reason)
[Evidence gates] contribution / evidence-strength / scale / deposition / compliance: pass|watch|block
[Biggest current gap] significance / field-evidence / replication / data-deposition / scale-framing / official requirements
[Claim to narrow] <claim, or none>
[Next step] invoke <skill-name> for single-venue fit and re-framing