| name | isr-topic-selection |
| description | Use when shaping or sanity-checking a research question for Information Systems Research (ISR) — testing sociotechnical, intradisciplinary fit, IT-artifact centrality, the level(s) of analysis, and whether the question belongs at ISR versus MISQ, JMIS, or Management Science. Locks the question and genre; it does not build the mechanism (isr-theory-development). |
Topic Selection & ISR Fit (isr-topic-selection)
When to trigger
- You have a phenomenon, dataset, or analytical model but are unsure it is an ISR question
- The idea may be "IT-adjacent" rather than genuinely about the design, use, valuation, or impact of IT
- You are choosing between ISR and a neighboring venue
- A colleague says "interesting, but is this IS, or just OB/econ/CS done with IT data?"
The ISR fit test
ISR is receptive to phenomena on the design, management, use, valuation, and impacts of information technology, examined at multiple levels of analysis — individuals, groups, firms, networks, societies, and nations. Pressure-test on four dimensions:
- IT-artifact centrality. The IT artifact (a system, platform, algorithm, digital infrastructure, data product) must shape the mechanism, not just supply the setting or the data. If you could swap "IT" for "any tool" and the story survived, fit is weak.
- Sociotechnical framing. ISR prizes work where the social and the technical co-constitute the phenomenon. Pure-technical (a CS systems paper) or pure-social (an OB paper that happens to use platform data) questions sit at the edge of fit.
- Intradisciplinary potential. ISR explicitly values work that bridges IS silos — integrating behavioral, design-science, economic, and organizational perspectives — over single-paradigm contributions.
- Level(s) of analysis. Name the level(s) and whether the contribution is within-level or cross-level.
Choose your genre early — ISR houses two co-equally
ISR is methodologically pluralistic and publishes, as co-equal first-class genres: (a) behavioral/empirical sociotechnical research, and (b) analytical economic/game-theoretic/econometric and design-science modeling. The 2025 multimethod-research framework editorial (ISR 36(2)) legitimizes combining them — but with explicit justification, not as garnish.
Fit vs. neighboring venues
- ISR vs. MISQ: both Basket-of-Eight; MISQ carries a stronger design-science genre identity. ISR welcomes DSR but as one of several co-equal genres.
- ISR vs. JMIS: overlapping scope, different editorial conventions.
- ISR vs. Management Science: MS is the broader INFORMS management/OR journal; if the IS angle is incidental, MS may fit better.
Checklist
Anti-patterns
- IT-as-wallpaper: a generic OB/econ/CS question dressed in platform data.
- Single-silo by default when an intradisciplinary framing was stronger.
- Genre drift: claiming an analytical contribution but doing descriptive empirics.
Fit pass for Information Systems Research
Run this as a concrete capability pass. First lock the digital artifact or system, user/firm behavior, identification or design evidence, and IS-theory contribution; then test whether the manuscript addresses IS reviewers who expect digital-technology theory, empirical or design leverage, and implications for organizations or markets.
- Primary move: Score fit, novelty, evidence readiness, and audience ownership; reject prestige-only targeting when a sibling venue owns the contribution more directly.
- Decision ledger: return
claim / evidence / blocker / next edit rows so the next pass can patch the manuscript directly.
- Sibling comparison: compare against MIS Quarterly for broader IS theory, Management Science for OR/MS generality, Journal of Management Information Systems for applied IS systems; if the neighboring outlet has the stronger audience claim, recommend re-routing before polishing.
- Verification floor: before submission-ready advice, re-open
resources/official-source-map.md for volatile rules and name the one unresolved fact that could change the recommendation.
Output format
【Phenomenon】[...]
【IT-artifact centrality】central / context-only
【Sociotechnical framing】yes / weak
【Intradisciplinary angle】silos bridged: [...]
【Level(s)】within/cross-level
【Genre】behavioral / analytical / design-science / multimethod — because [...]
【Venue】ISR vs MISQ/JMIS/MS: [...]
【Next step】isr-theory-development
