Skip to main content

bug-trace

Find the root cause of a reported bug: take in the report (GitHub issue, Jira ticket, file, or pasted text), trace the failing path hop by hop with each hop's runtime precondition, find the recent change that broke it, and rule out rival explanations. Use for any bug investigation where the cause is not yet known.

ソース情報

リポジトリ
BuilderIO/agent-native
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年10月14日 17:53
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
7,366
フォーク
669

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

ファイルエクスプローラー
3 ファイル

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
bug-trace
description
Find the root cause of a reported bug: take in the report (GitHub issue, Jira ticket, file, or pasted text), trace the failing path hop by hop with each hop's runtime precondition, find the recent change that broke it, and rule out rival explanations. Use for any bug investigation where the cause is not yet known.
scope
dev
metadata
{"internal":true}
# Bug trace This skill finds a root cause. It doesn't judge whether the cause is systemic; `investigate-bug` adds that judgment on top. Never change product code while tracing. ## 1. Take in the report ```bash pnpm exec tsx .agents/skills/bug-trace/scripts/bug-intake.ts \ --issue <N|url> | --jira <KEY|url> | --file <path> | --text "<report>" \ [--title "<line>"] [--run <id>] ``` It writes `bug.json` to the run directory and prints the run id (`bug-gh-123`, `bug-eng-456`, or `bug-<date>-<hash>`). Re-running with the same report reuses the run. Jira intake uses `jira-refactor-findings`' client and credentials. ## 2. Split symptoms A report often lists several. Treat each one on its own, with a short label. ## 3. Trace each symptom Follow `references/bug-investigation.md`: 1. Write the path as hops, each with file:line and its runtime precondition. 2. Check every precondition against today's code. 3. List what changed on the path: system-history `analyze.ts --focus` with every file on the path, then read each regression candidate with `pr.ts`. 4. Hold at least two explanations, and run the check that separates them. 5. Reproduce in the branch browser when the path runs there. 6. Check `AGENTS.md`, skills, and `packages/core` for a rule or primitive the code bypasses. When fanning out to sub-agents, give each one the symptom, its entry point, and the whole brief. Don't give it a theory or a short list of files: that list becomes the boundary of its search. ## Output For each symptom: - the hop list, and the broken hop; - the trigger commit, or `none-found` and what you checked; - the explanations you ruled out, and how; - the evidence level: `reproduced`, `traced` (a broken hop shown in code), or `inferred`; - the framework rule involved; - the sibling sites.
GitHubで見る