メニュー
Use when a feature request is loose or ambiguous and needs a reviewable spec before planning — turns "add X somehow" into user stories, acceptance criteria, out-of-scope, and open questions via spec_writer
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Use when the user wants a security review of code or a diff — OWASP/CWE findings with severity, taint/data-flow analysis, and concrete fixes via security_review
Use when the user wants tests generated for code or a diff — enumerates edge cases and failure modes first, then emits runnable test code via testgen
Use when a task would benefit from a structured thinking technique but you're not sure which — recommends the right prompt technique for the intent (debug, spec, refactor, decision, design) and applies it
Use for decisions or judgments worth multiple independent perspectives — multi-model council with parallel analysis, search grounding, and synthesis (30-60s); for a quick single-call verdict use the jury tool directly
Use when the user shares or finishes a plan and wants it stress-tested before execution — adversarial multi-model pre-mortem with ranked risks, mitigations, and concrete plan edits
Use when code changes are ready for review — a diff exists, the user says "review my changes/PR", or a commit is about to happen. Multi-model diff review (Kimi, DeepSeek, GPT-5.5 panel + Gemini judge) with a MERGEABLE verdict
| name | spec |
| description | Use when a feature request is loose or ambiguous and needs a reviewable spec before planning — turns "add X somehow" into user stories, acceptance criteria, out-of-scope, and open questions via spec_writer |
| user-invocable | true |
files.spec_writer with request, context, files, and format if the user prefers user_story or gherkin (default both).planner_maker (or /blueprint) to plan the HOW.Requires OPENAI_API_KEY. If the tool returns its missing-key error, relay it and suggest /setup.