Skip to main content

culture-articulation

Use when articulating or revising company values and culture — covers behavioral anchoring, decision-priority hierarchy, and operationalization.

インストールへ移動

ソース情報

リポジトリ
ccashwell/agentic-hr
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年4月25日 23:49
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
0
フォーク
0

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
culture-articulation
description
Use when articulating or revising company values and culture — covers behavioral anchoring, decision-priority hierarchy, and operationalization.
# Culture Articulation ## Core Frame Culture is the pattern of behavior the company rewards, tolerates, and punishes. Values are the *stated intent* about that pattern. The gap between stated values and operating culture is where most failure happens. The articulation goal: values that are specific, behavioral, decision-useful, tested, few — and that show up in hiring, performance, and exits. ## What Good Values Look Like - **Specific**: "We move fast" beats "We embrace agility" - **Behavioral**: name the action, not the feeling - **Decision-useful**: when two values conflict, the priority is named - **Tested**: "If X then Y" — what would this value require us to *not* do? - **Few**: 3–7. More than 7 means none. Bad values: - Buzzwords without behaviors (excellence, innovation, synergy) - Values nobody could disagree with (integrity, respect) - Values with no implication for action ## Articulation Process ### Workshop Approach (1–2 days) 1. **Diagnose current culture**: interviews, observations, employee voice. What's actually rewarded? What's tolerated? What's punished? 2. **Identify aspirational behaviors**: what does the company need to be more of? 3. **Draft values**: 3–7 candidates with behavioral anchors 4. **Test with cases**: when has this value been demonstrated? When has it been violated? 5. **Decision-priority hierarchy**: when values conflict, which wins? 6. **Operationalize plan**: how will this show up in hiring, performance, recognition, exits? 7. **Communicate**: roll out with stories, not just words ## Behavioral Anchors For each value, define: - **What it looks like in practice** (observable behavior; specific examples) - **What it doesn't look like** (counter-examples; bright lines) - **What we'd reward** (recognition, promotion patterns) - **What we'd push back on** (feedback patterns; never-tolerate behaviors) Example: **Value: "Tell the truth"** - Looks like: surfacing problems early; honest performance feedback; transparent communication during hard times; admitting "I don't know" - Doesn't look like: filtering bad news; saying yes when meaning maybe; performative agreement - Reward: managers who deliver hard feedback well; employees who push back with evidence - Push back on: "managing up" patterns; surface alignment with private dissent ## Decision Priority Hierarchy When values conflict, name which wins: - "We prioritize customer trust over short-term growth" - "We prioritize team performance over individual heroics" - "We prioritize transparency over comfort" Without this, values become ornamental. ## Operationalization Values must show up in: - **Hiring**: questions and rubric items target the values - **Onboarding**: explicit narration of what values mean here, with examples - **Performance**: behaviors aligned to values part of rubric - **Recognition**: praise tied to specific values-aligned behavior - **Termination**: people who violate the values get exited (the most powerful signal) - **Promotion**: values demonstrated as a criterion for advancement If a value has no implication in any of these, it isn't a value. ## Common Failures - Buzzword values nobody can repeat - Values nobody could disagree with - Values that contradict actual practice (e.g., "transparency" while withholding comp bands) - 12 values (= no values) - Values exercise produces a poster; nothing changes - Stated culture aimed at recruiting candidates rather than guiding employees - Founder behavior contradicts stated values (loudest culture signal) ## Refresh Cadence Annual review of: - Are these still the right values? - Have they stuck? - Where's the gap between stated and operating? - What needs to change? Don't change values frequently — but re-test their operationalization regularly. ## Sample Values Sets (Reference) For inspiration, not copying: - Netflix: "Judgment, Communication, Curiosity, Courage, Passion, Selflessness, Innovation, Inclusion, Integrity, Impact" — operationalized aggressively in the culture deck - Stripe: "Move with urgency and focus. Trust and amplify. Optimize globally. Operate with rigor." - Patagonia: "Build the best product. Cause no unnecessary harm. Use business to inspire and implement solutions to the environmental crisis." What's notable: each is specific, with implications. None is "we believe in excellence." ## Cross-References - `culture-architect` agent - `psychological-safety` skill - `inclusion-belonging` skill - `change-management` skill ## Key References - McCord, P. (2017). *Powerful*. - Coyle, D. (2018). *The Culture Code*. - Schein, E. H. (2010). *Organizational Culture and Leadership*. - Horowitz, B. (2019). *What You Do Is Who You Are*.
GitHubで見る