- name
- conceptual-frameworks
- description
- Use when building or using conceptual and theoretical frameworks in qualitative research.
# Conceptual and Theoretical Frameworks
A **conceptual framework** organizes key concepts and their proposed relationships for inquiry. A **theoretical framework** anchors the study more explicitly in named theories. Frameworks can clarify focus—or **force** data if deployed insensitively.
## Conceptual vs theoretical
- **Conceptual:** often diagrammatic; may combine constructs from several sources without full commitment to one grand theory.
- **Theoretical:** cites specific theories (e.g., Bourdieu, stress-process models) to interpret mechanisms.
The boundary is fuzzy in practice; be explicit about what you are doing.
## Role in qualitative research (non-GT)
In case studies, ethnographies, or thematic analyses, frameworks can:
- Provide **sensitizing concepts** (Blumer).
- Guide initial sampling or interview topics.
- Offer **dialogue partners** in discussion sections.
## Glaser’s stance: no framework before GT (classic)
In Glaserian classic GT, avoid importing a substantive-area framework **before** emergence. Literature prior to analysis can **force** categories. Instead, develop theoretical sensitivity through **broad reading outside** the substantive area and through **memoing**.
If a framework appears later, treat extant theory as **more data** to compare against your emergent theory.
## When frameworks are appropriate
Framework-first approaches can be appropriate when:
- Your question is explicitly **theory-testing** or **critical** (not classic GT).
- You use **program theory** evaluation designs.
- You conduct **deductive** qualitative content analysis with transparent rules.
## Building a framework from literature (when allowed)
1. Map constructs and claims across sources.
2. Identify **contradictions** and **boundary conditions**.
3. Draft a diagram with **directional hypotheses** framed as **working ideas**, not shackles.
4. Iterate after early data—revise or abandon what fails to fit.
## Visual representation
Use boxes for constructs, arrows for proposed influences, footnotes for contested links. Keep **legends** and **definitions** adjacent; avoid spaghetti diagrams.
## Sensitizing concepts (Blumer)
Sensitizing concepts give **direction** without determining findings: they suggest **what kinds of things matter** (e.g., “career,” “negotiation”) while leaving content open.
## Integration with analysis
If you start with sensitizing concepts, log **every moment** a concept did not fit—those moments often birth **new categories**.
## Checklist
- [ ] Framework purpose stated (sensitizing vs testing vs GT-post-emergence).
- [ ] Classic GT: pre-study substantive forcing avoided.
- [ ] Definitions operationalized enough to guide (not strangle) inquiry.
- [ ] Visual model readable; arrows interpreted.
- [ ] Revisions tracked when data challenge the framework.
## References (starting points)
- Blumer, H. *Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method* — sensitizing concepts.
- Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. *Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook* — matrix-based conceptual displays.
- Glaser, B. G. *Theoretical Sensitivity* — caution on imported frameworks in GT.
GitHubで見る