メニュー
Implement world interaction, picking, triggers, HUD coordination, and world-space UI patterns for a three.js game. Use when scene objects must become robust interactive gameplay entities instead of raw meshes.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
| name | threejs-game-interaction-ui |
| description | Implement world interaction, picking, triggers, HUD coordination, and world-space UI patterns for a three.js game. Use when scene objects must become robust interactive gameplay entities instead of raw meshes. |
为 three.js 游戏建立稳定的世界交互层，包括拾取、触发器、交互提示、HUD、世界空间 UI 和事件路由。
至少定义：
idlecandidatefocusedarmedinteractingcooldown并说明每个状态的 UI 表现。
建议事件：
interaction:candidate-changedinteraction:startedinteraction:completedinteraction:cancelledtrigger:entertrigger:exit如果对象具备以下任一条件，先列风险：
Use when the user asks to report, summarize, audit, or present the implementation result of a plan, roadmap, PRD, engineering plan, refactor plan, migration plan, release plan, or task list. Produces evidence-based completion reports with overall, stage, and module completion percentages; goal-to-result verification tables; explicit concrete engineering benefits; unfinished-work impact analysis; and concrete next actions, using tables and charts instead of vague prose.
Use when the user asks for a software engineering plan, implementation plan, refactor plan, migration plan, rollout plan, bug-fix plan, performance optimization plan, security change plan, DevOps / CI/CD plan, technical execution plan, or review of an existing engineering plan. Produces phased, executable, independently verifiable, reviewable, rollback-aware plans with strict phase gates, plan-to-code completeness, benefit validation, and chain-state logging evidence for software engineering work.
Use when a task needs independent adversarial review during vibe coding, design work, implementation, testing, release planning, documentation, skill creation, or agent workflow design. It uses fresh internal subagents, or a user-approved local CLI reviewer fallback when internal subagents are unavailable, to attack artifact assumptions, happy paths, implementation completeness, target benefit realization, user-perspective usability, failure scenarios, and evidence gaps through formal /vs_review/ reports and mandatory response closure.
Use when Codex needs to design, reorganize, audit, or maintain a repository's documentation system: docs/ directory hierarchy, global vs version-level documents, version PRDs, technical designs, engineering plans, document versioning, naming conventions, link/index management, archive policy, or automated docs structure validation.
Use when debugging medium or large bugs, regressions, flaky failures, production symptoms, repeated failed fixes, or user-explicit requests where the agent must combine persistent /coe case tracking, independent multi-path root-cause investigation, and a hard diagnostic evidence gate before repair design or implementation.
Use when a user brings a new product, feature, app, website, internal tool, automation, workflow, or other product requirement that needs multi-round clarification before implementation. The skill keeps the conversation focused on product logic, user experience, interaction design, rules, edge cases, and acceptance criteria, then writes a Draft or Ready PRD.