Skip to main content

optimizing-performance

Analyzes and optimizes application performance across frontend, backend, and database layers. Use when diagnosing slowness, improving load times, optimizing queries, reducing bundle size, or when asked about performance issues.

ソース情報

リポジトリ
CloudAI-X/claude-workflow-v2
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年10月1日 23:45
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
1,423
フォーク
188

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
optimizing-performance
description
Analyzes and optimizes application performance across frontend, backend, and database layers. Use when diagnosing slowness, improving load times, optimizing queries, reducing bundle size, or when asked about performance issues.
# Optimizing Performance ### When to Load - **Trigger**: Diagnosing slowness, profiling, caching strategies, reducing load times, bundle size optimization - **Skip**: Correctness-focused work where performance is not a concern ## Performance Optimization Workflow Copy this checklist and track progress: ``` Performance Optimization Progress: - [ ] Step 1: Measure baseline performance - [ ] Step 2: Identify bottlenecks - [ ] Step 3: Apply targeted optimizations - [ ] Step 4: Measure again and compare - [ ] Step 5: Repeat if targets not met ``` **Critical Rule**: Never optimize without data. Always profile before and after changes. ## Step 1: Measure Baseline ### Profiling Commands ```bash # Node.js profiling node --prof app.js node --prof-process isolate*.log > profile.txt # Python profiling python -m cProfile -o profile.stats app.py python -m pstats profile.stats # Web performance lighthouse https://example.com --output=json ``` ## Step 2: Identify Bottlenecks ### Common Bottleneck Categories | Category | Symptoms | Tools | | -------- | -------------------------------- | ------------------------------- | | CPU | High CPU usage, slow computation | Profiler, flame graphs | | Memory | High RAM, GC pauses, OOM | Heap snapshots, memory profiler | | I/O | Slow disk/network, waiting | strace, network inspector | | Database | Slow queries, lock contention | Query analyzer, EXPLAIN | ## Step 3: Apply Optimizations ### Frontend Optimizations **Bundle Size:** ```javascript // ❌ Import entire library import _ from "lodash"; // ✅ Import only needed functions import debounce from "lodash/debounce"; // ✅ Use dynamic imports for code splitting const HeavyComponent = lazy(() => import("./HeavyComponent")); ``` **Rendering:** ```javascript // ❌ Render on every parent update function Child({ data }) { return <ExpensiveComponent data={data} />; } // ✅ Memoize when props don't change const Child = memo(function Child({ data }) { return <ExpensiveComponent data={data} />; }); // ✅ Use useMemo for expensive computations const processed = useMemo(() => expensiveCalc(data), [data]); ``` **Images:** ```html <!-- ❌ Unoptimized --> <img src="large-image.jpg" /> <!-- ✅ Optimized --> <img src="image.webp" srcset="image-300.webp 300w, image-600.webp 600w" sizes="(max-width: 600px) 300px, 600px" width="600" height="400" alt="Description" loading="lazy" decoding="async" /> ``` ### Backend Optimizations **Database Queries:** ```sql -- ❌ N+1 Query Problem SELECT * FROM users; -- Then for each user: SELECT * FROM orders WHERE user_id = ?; -- ✅ Single query with JOIN SELECT u.id, u.name, o.id AS order_id, o.total FROM users u LEFT JOIN orders o ON u.id = o.user_id; -- ✅ Or use pagination SELECT id, name FROM users WHERE id > :last_id ORDER BY id LIMIT 100; ``` **Caching Strategy:** ```javascript // Multi-layer caching const getUser = async (id) => { // L1: In-memory cache (fastest) let user = memoryCache.get(`user:${id}`); if (user) return user; // L2: Redis cache (fast) user = await redis.get(`user:${id}`); if (user) { user = JSON.parse(user); memoryCache.set(`user:${id}`, user, 60); return user; } // L3: Database (slow) user = await db.users.findById(id); await redis.setex(`user:${id}`, 3600, JSON.stringify(user)); memoryCache.set(`user:${id}`, user, 60); return user; }; ``` **Async Processing:** ```javascript // ❌ Blocking operation app.post("/upload", async (req, res) => { await processVideo(req.file); // Takes 5 minutes res.send("Done"); }); // ✅ Queue for background processing app.post("/upload", async (req, res) => { const jobId = await queue.add("processVideo", { file: req.file }); res.status(202).send({ jobId, status: "processing" }); }); ``` ### Algorithm Optimizations ```javascript // ❌ O(n²) - nested loops function findDuplicates(arr) { const duplicates = []; for (let i = 0; i < arr.length; i++) { for (let j = i + 1; j < arr.length; j++) { if (arr[i] === arr[j]) duplicates.push(arr[i]); } } return duplicates; } // ✅ O(n) - hash map function findDuplicates(arr) { const seen = new Set(); const duplicates = new Set(); for (const item of arr) { if (seen.has(item)) duplicates.add(item); seen.add(item); } return [...duplicates]; } ``` ## Step 4: Measure Again After applying optimizations, re-run profiling and compare: ``` Comparison Checklist: - [ ] Run same profiling tools as baseline - [ ] Compare metrics before vs after - [ ] Verify no regressions in other areas - [ ] Document improvement percentages ``` ## Performance Targets ### Web Vitals | Metric | Good | Needs Work | Poor | | ------ | ------- | ---------- | ------- | | LCP | < 2.5s | 2.5-4s | > 4s | | INP | < 200ms | 200-500ms | > 500ms | | CLS | < 0.1 | 0.1-0.25 | > 0.25 | | TTFB | < 800ms | 800ms-1.8s | > 1.8s | ### API Performance | Metric | Target | | ----------- | ------- | | P50 Latency | < 100ms | | P95 Latency | < 500ms | | P99 Latency | < 1s | | Error Rate | < 0.1% | ## Validation After optimization, validate results: ``` Performance Validation: - [ ] Metrics improved from baseline - [ ] No functionality regressions - [ ] No new errors introduced - [ ] Changes are sustainable (not one-time fixes) - [ ] Performance gains documented ``` If targets not met, return to Step 2 and identify remaining bottlenecks.
GitHubで見る