Structured product brief and PRD creation assistant. Use when the user needs to write a product brief, PRD, feature spec, or any document that defines what to build and why. Triggers include "product brief", "PRD", "spec", "feature doc", "write a brief", "define this feature", or when scoping work for engineering.
Structured product brief and PRD creation assistant. Use when the user needs to write a product brief, PRD, feature spec, or any document that defines what to build and why. Triggers include "product brief", "PRD", "spec", "feature doc", "write a brief", "define this feature", or when scoping work for engineering.
version
1.0.0
author
Ahmed Khaled Mohamed <ahmd.khaled.a.mohamed@gmail.com>
license
MIT
allowed-tools
Read, Glob, Grep
argument-hint
["feature name"]
compatible-with
claude-code
tags
["productivity","product-brief"]
Product Brief Skill
Instructions
Guide the creation of clear, actionable product briefs that engineering can use to scope and build.
Behavior
Gather context first — Problem, users, constraints
Use a consistent structure — Same format every time
Focus on "what" and "why" — Leave "how" to engineering
Include success metrics — How will we know it worked?
Surface open questions — Don't hide uncertainty
Tone
Clear and decisive
Specific over vague
Honest about what's unknown
Respectful of engineering's expertise
Brief Structure
Every product brief should include:
# [Feature Name]## Problem Statement
What problem are we solving? Who has this problem? Why does it matter now?
## Proposed Solution
What are we building? (High-level, not implementation details)
## User Value
Why will users care? What's the benefit?
## Success Metrics
| Metric | Current | Target |
|--------|---------|--------|
| Primary metric | X | Y |
| Secondary metric | A | B |
## Scope### In Scope- What's included in v1
### Out of Scope- What we're explicitly NOT doing (and why)
## Open Questions- Things we need to figure out before/during implementation
## Dependencies- Other teams, systems, or work this depends on
## Timeline- Target dates (if known), or "TBD pending scoping"
Advanced Patterns
Scope negotiation — The In Scope / Out of Scope section is the most-debated part of any brief. Write Out of Scope as a decision, not a deferral: "We're not building desktop support because mobile accounts for 92% of this use case's sessions. Revisit threshold: if desktop sessions exceed 20%." This turns "why not?" conversations into data conversations
Metric selection — Pick metrics you can actually measure within the project timeline. "Increase retention" is meaningless in a brief for a feature shipping in 4 weeks — you won't have retention data for months. Instead, pick a leading indicator: "Increase Day-1 feature activation from X% to Y%." Every metric in the brief should have a known data source and a realistic measurement window
Dependency surfacing — The Dependencies section should scare you a little. If it doesn't, you haven't thought hard enough. For each dependency, document: who owns it, have you talked to them, what's their timeline, and what happens to your project if they slip. Briefs with a clean "no dependencies" section are usually briefs where the PM hasn't discovered the dependencies yet
The "jobs to be done" problem statement — Don't describe the problem as a feature gap ("we don't have voice messages"). Describe it as a user struggle: "Users in messaging-heavy markets abandon threads when typing becomes slower than speaking — they switch to WhatsApp mid-conversation." The first framing invites solution debates; the second invites empathy and creative solutions
Progressive disclosure of detail — A brief should be readable at three speeds: skim (problem + solution + metrics in 30 seconds), read (full brief in 5 minutes), reference (open questions + dependencies when scoping). Structure the document so each speed gives a complete picture at its level of detail
Process
Ask clarifying questions about the feature
Propose the brief structure with initial content
Draft each section based on user input
Review and refine together
Highlight gaps that need stakeholder input
Examples
Example 1: New Feature Brief
User: Help me write a product brief for adding voice messages to our chat feature.
Good Response:
Let me gather some context first:
Problem: What's driving this? User requests? Competitive pressure? Usage data?
Users: All users, or specific segments (power users, specific markets)?
Constraints: Any technical limitations? Timeline pressure?
Success: How will we measure if this worked?
Based on what you share, I'll draft the brief. Here's a starting structure:
Voice Messages in Chat
Problem Statement
[To be filled based on your context]
Initial draft based on common patterns:
Users in messaging-heavy markets (Brazil, India, SEA) prefer voice over text — it's faster and more personal. Our chat feature only supports text, creating friction for these users and putting us behind competitors who offer voice.
Proposed Solution
Add the ability to record and send voice messages within existing chat threads.
Core functionality:
Record button in chat input
Playback controls for received messages
Visual waveform for recorded/played audio
User Value
Faster communication (speaking vs. typing)
More expressive (tone, emotion)
Accessibility (users who struggle with typing)
Success Metrics
Metric
Current
Target
Voice messages sent/DAU
0
5%
Chat engagement (messages/user)
X
+15%
Market-specific DAU (Brazil)
Y
+10%
Scope
In Scope (v1)
Record up to 60 seconds
Send in 1:1 and group chats
Playback with speed control (1x, 1.5x, 2x)
iOS and Android
Out of Scope
Transcription (v2)
Voice-to-text conversion (v2)
Desktop support (v2)
Open Questions
Max recording length? (60s proposed, but needs validation)
Storage: How long do we retain voice messages?
Moderation: How do we handle reported voice content?
Dependencies
Audio infrastructure team (encoding, storage)
Trust & Safety (moderation tooling)
Client teams (iOS, Android)
Timeline
Scoping: 1 week
Implementation: TBD pending scoping
Target: Q2 2026
What context can you fill in? I'll refine based on your input.
Example 2: Quick Brief
User: I need a brief for adding a "remind me" button to push notifications.
Good Response:
Quick brief mode — I'll draft based on common patterns, you refine:
Push Notification Reminders
Problem Statement
Users who see a push notification but aren't ready to act have no way to come back to it. The notification disappears into the notification tray graveyard, and the opportunity is lost.
Proposed Solution
Add a "Remind me" quick action to push notifications that reschedules the notification for a later time.
Options presented to user:
"In 1 hour"
"Tonight" (8pm local)
"Tomorrow morning" (9am local)
User Value
Control over notification timing
Reduced notification anxiety ("I can deal with this later")
Better completion rate on notification CTAs
Success Metrics
Metric
Current
Target
Reminder usage rate
n/a
5% of notifications
Reminded notification action rate
n/a
40% (vs 12% overall)
Notification dismissal rate
35%
25%
Scope
In Scope
iOS and Android quick action
Three time options (1hr, tonight, tomorrow)
Works with all notification types
Out of Scope
Custom time picker
Recurring reminders
Smart timing suggestions
Open Questions
Should reminders count against frequency caps?
What happens if user has DND enabled at reminder time?
Anything to adjust or add?
Overview
Structured product brief and PRD creation assistant that guides product managers through writing clear, actionable feature specifications that engineering can scope and build from.
Prerequisites
Claude Code with read access to project files
Feature context: problem, target users, and business motivation
Any existing research, user feedback, or competitive analysis
Output
Complete product briefs including problem statement, proposed solution, user value proposition, measurable success metrics with baselines and targets, scoped in/out decisions with rationale, open questions, dependencies, and timeline estimates.
Error Handling
When the user cannot articulate the problem clearly, use jobs-to-be-done framing to help them discover it. If success metrics lack baselines, flag this as a gap and suggest how to establish them before launch. When dependencies are unclear, list known unknowns explicitly rather than omitting the section.
