| name | investigation-summary |
| language | en |
| description | Produces structured antitrust investigation summaries for executives and counsel. Triggers on FTC/DOJ probes, state AG investigations, foreign competition authority inquiries, merger investigations, CIDs, subpoenas, or dawn-raid responses. |
| tags | ["regulatory","summarization","summary"] |
Antitrust Investigation Summary
Decision-ready antitrust investigation brief with evidence-linked chronology, legal theories, and business risk assessment.
Quick Start
Gather before drafting:
- Regulatory process documents (CIDs, subpoenas, Second Requests, notices)
- Internal investigation materials (interview memos, forensic reviews, privilege logs)
- Market data (shares, competitors, pricing, entry barriers)
- Public sources (press, filings, complaints, consent decrees)
- Current status (deadlines, productions, negotiations)
Workflow
1. Build Key-Facts Table
Populate and resolve gaps before drafting.
| Field | Detail |
|---|
| Investigating Authority | Agency, division, lead office, contact(s) |
| Matter Type | Conduct, merger, or industry sweep |
| Alleged Conduct | Price-fixing, monopolization, exclusive dealing, etc. |
| Market Definition | Product and geographic market as asserted |
| Statutory Hooks | Sherman §1/§2, Clayton §7, FTC Act §5, state/foreign provisions |
| Initiation Trigger | Complaint, market study, HSR, dawn raid, etc. |
| First Notice Date | Date and instrument |
| Procedural Posture | Inquiry, formal investigation, litigation, appeal |
| Key Deadlines | Production dates, meetings, milestones |
| Exposure Signals | Penalties, remedies sought, damages claims |
| Remediation | Compliance changes, business changes |
2. Draft Summary
Use this template. Cite every factual assertion with [source: <id>].
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED & WORK PRODUCT
CONFIDENTIAL — ANTITRUST INVESTIGATION SUMMARY
**Executive Overview**
Agency:
Matter Type:
Alleged Conduct:
Market:
Current Status:
Immediate Decisions/Actions:
**Chronology**
| Date | Event | Source | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
**Allegations & Legal Theories**
| Theory | Conduct | Market Definition | Statutes | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
**Market & Industry Context**
- Market structure and shares:
- Key competitors:
- Barriers to entry:
- Industry dynamics or consolidation:
**Procedural Status**
- Steps completed:
- Outstanding requests:
- Upcoming milestones:
**Company Response**
- Cooperation posture:
- Privilege/objections asserted:
- Internal investigation steps:
- Remedial measures:
**Outcomes / Scenarios**
- If closed: disposition and conditions.
- If ongoing: likely outcomes and timelines.
**Risk Assessment**
| Risk Category | Exposure | Drivers | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|---|
**Compliance Actions**
- Immediate controls:
- Medium-term enhancements:
- Training or policy updates:
3. Multi-Jurisdiction Matters
If multiple authorities are involved, create one subsection per authority and a consolidated risk section.
Pitfalls
- Allegations vs. facts: Separate clearly; never speculate.
- Missing data: Flag with
[VERIFY], especially for uncertain statutes or foreign-law citations.
- Exact references: Use precise dates, agency names, and instrument titles — do not paraphrase.
- Inferences: Label explicitly and cite the underlying source.
- Merger matters: State the asserted theory of harm and any divestiture or behavioral remedy signals.
- Parallel proceedings: Include state AGs, EC, CMA, or other competition authorities as separate subsections.
- Privilege headers: Maintain
ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED & WORK PRODUCT on every output.
