メニュー
Comprehensive game design methodology including OGD (Organic Game Design), player psychology, mechanics, balancing, and retention strategies.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Scale-to-fit canvas layout system for games. Use when implementing or modifying game layout, resolution handling, UI scaling, text fitting, or input coordinate transformation. Ensures identical visual composition across all devices using unified scale model.
Extracts emojis as SVGs from a given font file or URL. Use this skill when you need to obtain high-quality SVG assets for specific emojis from a specific font.
| name | game-design |
| description | Comprehensive game design methodology including OGD (Organic Game Design), player psychology, mechanics, balancing, and retention strategies. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Glob, Grep |
Organic Game Design (OGD) + Practical Game Development Frameworks
Based on the indie gamedev knowledge base by Dmitrii Zaitsev (Galaxy Burger creator)
Organic Game Design (OGD) is an engineering approach to game design that views games not as closed systems, but as organic parts of a player's life.
Instead of asking: "Is this mechanic fun?"
We ask: "What deficiency in the player's life does it fulfill?"
Humans are systems seeking optimal regulation (allostasis). Real life constantly disrupts this balance:
Players unconsciously gravitate toward experiences that compensate their current state and return them to flow.
| Organic Games | Synthetic Games |
|---|---|
| Address real psychological needs | Exploit brain vulnerabilities |
| Transparent rules, honest challenge | FOMO, manipulative loot boxes, artificial scarcity |
| Player feels restored after session | Player feels drained but wants more |
| Example: Stardew Valley, Tetris | Example: Predatory gacha, aggressive timers |
OGD Test: If a player closes your game feeling guilty ("wasted time") → synthetic.
If they feel fulfilled ("that was good") → organic.
Games function as one of several tool types. They either reproduce reality (giving players power to overcome what they can't in life) or provide the opposite (a safe haven for recovery).
Purpose: Reduce stress and anxiety, not entertain or combat boredom.
Target Player: Exhausted, low energy, constant anxiety. Needs rest, not new challenges.
Design Principles:
Flow Curve: Like breathing — slow rise with periodic "exhales" into mild boredom, allowing players to rest and exit peacefully.
Examples: Stardew Valley, Unpacking, Tetris, LEGO, Minecraft (peaceful mode), PEAK
Scientific Basis (Active Inference): The brain is tired of life's unpredictability. It needs a zone where "Press X → Get Y" works with 100% probability. This makes "grinding" not a time-waster, but a form of digital meditation.
Purpose: Combat boredom, shake things up, provide an outlet — not offer peace.
Target Player: Full of energy but feels powerless or incredibly bored. Needs challenge, not calm.
Design Principles:
Examples: DOOM, Resident Evil, CS:GO, Dota, Among Us, Fallout
Scientific Basis (Eustress & Prediction Error): If Shelter minimizes prediction errors, Simulator intentionally creates them. The brain stuck in routine (excessive order) starves for novelty. Simulator provides useful stress (eustress), mobilizing the brain. Victory over this stress gives a powerful dopamine release.
Risk: ~50/50 split of stabilizers and stimulators. Can attract incompatible audiences.
Design Rules:
💡 Pendulum games are like "2-in-1": essentially two games wrapped into one.
Examples: Dave the Diver (cozy restaurant by day, harpoons and sharks by night), Cult of the Lamb
Many stabilizers and stimulators — "activities" and mini-games for every taste. Literal buffet: "choose what you want, pay only for entry."
Risk: High cognitive load ("what should I do next?")
Examples: GTA, Yakuza, Horizon Zero Dawn, Zelda series, The Witcher, most Ubisoft games
💡 Large AAA games are often like this: trying to cover maximum audiences to justify budgets and reduce risk. Indie developers often fail trying to make buffet games without resources.
Where is the player's real-life imbalance?
OGD introduces 5 Spheres — major life areas where imbalance commonly occurs:
Handles: Information processing, learning, understanding, decision-making, logic.
Handles: Physical, informational, systemic space around the player.
Handles: Conflict, hierarchy, safety. Interactions with others in power coordinates: fight or flight, self-assertion, status.
Note: Suppression is treated with challenge, not rest.
Suppressed teens go to CS and Valorant, not cozy farms. In PvP there are fair rules. Results depend on you. This returns agency that was taken in real life.
Handles: Resource ownership: money, material assets, physical energy (life tone).
Handles: Group belonging, empathy, connections. Humans are social animals: isolation feels like physical pain, but excessive connections also cause stress.
Special Case: Existential Crisis & Nihilism
Sometimes imbalance peaks across multiple spheres, creating a feeling of total insignificance. This is NOT a 6th sphere, but a state of Zero Agency. Players in this state seek influence (meaning), not fun.
Every person wants Agency (from Self-Determination Theory) — the ability to influence their life so it works and produces results.
Agency in games = player's ability to influence game systems through tools ("hammers"). Each toolkit works in two modes:
Native tools for balancing Environment sphere 🏙️
Stabilizer → CLOSE OFF. Isolation, walls, shelters, barriers.
Examples: Minecraft (base building), Tower Defense
Stimulator → OPEN UP. Exploration, going beyond walls, discovering new.
Examples: Skyrim, Subnautica
Native tools for Cognition sphere 🧠
Stabilizer → ASSEMBLE. Organizing, sorting, cleaning, reducing entropy.
Examples: Unpacking, Tetris
Stimulator → DISASSEMBLE. Solve, investigate, find connections and patterns, solve puzzles.
Examples: The Witness, detective games, complex puzzles
Native tools for Resources sphere 💰
Stabilizer → SIMPLIFY (Optimization). Turning routine into automation. Get same (or more) result with fewer actions.
Examples: Drones, auto-battle, idle income, "vacuum" for loot, "auto-sort" upgrade
Stimulator → COMPLICATE (Over-result). Consciously building complex, cumbersome, or risky schemes to squeeze maximum from the game (min-maxing).
Examples: Redstone engineering in Minecraft, complex builds in PoE, overclocking in simulators
Native tools for Power sphere 😡
Stabilizer → SUPPRESS. Domination, threat elimination head-on, active self-defense.
Examples: DOOM, action games, military strategies
Stimulator → CHALLENGE. Competition, challenging opponent, status fight.
Examples: PvP, rankings, leaderboards
Native tools for Society sphere 👫
Stabilizer → GET CLOSE. Support, cooperation, care, empathy.
Examples: Stardew Valley, always-happy NPCs, support role ("healer")
Stimulator → MANIPULATE. Deception, intrigue, social stealth.
Examples: Among Us, mafia-like games, political simulators
Stabilizer → EVADE. Adapt, minimize risks, develop reactions to threats.
Examples: Roguelikes, survival games
Stimulator → RISK. Excitement, voluntary risk, high stakes.
Examples: Poker, loot, gacha/loot boxes
DO NOT add both stabilizer and stimulator from the same category.
Example: Don't mix friendship/closeness mechanics with manipulation/deception mechanics in the same game.
Exception for RPG/Role-playing Games: Actively add both stabilizer and stimulator from the same sphere, as roles involve character changeability and complexity.
| Sphere | Native Tool | Compensating Tool | Synthetic Tool |
|---|---|---|---|
| COGNITION | Structure (Assemble/Disassemble) | Efficiency (stab), Chance (stim), Power (stim) | Power (stab) - Suppress: "less thinking, more shooting" |
| ENVIRONMENT | Boundaries (Close/Open) | Chance (stab), Efficiency (stab) | Structure (stab) - Assemble: turning nature into factory |
| RESOURCES | Efficiency (Simplify/Complicate) | Chance (stim), Society (stab) | Chance (stim) - Risk: gacha, monetizing friendship |
| POWER | Power (Suppress/Challenge) | Boundaries (stab), Structure (stab) | Structure (stim) - Disassemble: war as chess |
| SOCIETY | Society (Get Close/Manipulate) | Power (stab), Efficiency (stab) | Efficiency (stab) - Simplify: gamified relationships |
Every game needs a fun 30-second loop:
| Genre | Core Loop |
|---|---|
| Platformer | Run → Jump → Land → Collect |
| Shooter | Aim → Shoot → Kill → Loot |
| Puzzle | Observe → Think → Solve → Advance |
| RPG | Explore → Fight → Level → Gear |
| Shelter | Gather → Build → Admire → Relax |
| Type | Driven By |
|---|---|
| Achiever | Goals, completion |
| Explorer | Discovery, secrets |
| Socializer | Interaction, community |
| Killer | Competition, dominance |
| Schedule | Effect | Use |
|---|---|---|
| Fixed | Predictable | Milestone rewards |
| Variable | Addictive | Loot drops |
| Ratio | Effort-based | Grind games |
Why do players leave after 15 minutes?
Players have limited cognitive budget. New game = high load:
Solutions:
Too Hard → Frustration → Quit
Too Easy → Boredom → Quit
Just Right → Flow → Engagement
Problem: Players can get stuck in a loop that's "engaging" but harmful.
Signs:
OGD Solution: Design "soft landings" — moments where players can exit gracefully without feeling punished.
Innovators (high cognitive resource) = Try new, complex games
Early/Late Majority (high entry barrier) = Stick to familiar patterns
Two Business Strategies:
| Type | Example |
|---|---|
| Skill | Player gets better (Dark Souls) |
| Power | Character gets stronger (RPG stats) |
| Content | New areas unlock (Metroidvania) |
| Story | Narrative advances (visual novels) |
Traditional thinking: Keep player engaged at all costs
OGD thinking: Let players leave satisfied, they'll return
Soft Landing Protocol:
Last Screen Test: What does the player see before closing the game?
Data (Quantic Foundry):
OGD is the philosophy of adult gaming.
Genre = promise of mechanics
Setting = promise of atmosphere & theme
Dissonance can work IF:
Don't ask: "What features does my game have?"
Ask: "What state does the player want to reach, and how does my game help?"
Examples:
Key insight: Localization isn't just translation.
Priority languages (by ROI for indie):
Cultural adaptation matters more than perfect translation.
You have a game, want to find who plays it.
You have an audience, want to create a game for them.
Your game isn't working, need to find why.
You need to market but can't show gameplay yet.
| ❌ Don't | ✅ Do |
|---|---|
| Design in isolation | Playtest constantly |
| Polish before fun | Prototype first |
| Punish excessively | Reward progress |
| Add features randomly | Design with purpose (which sphere?) |
| Mix incompatible tools | Check tool compatibility table |
| Copy mechanics blindly | Understand underlying need |
| Ignore cognitive load | Reduce friction at entry |
OGD is descriptive and predictive, not prescriptive. It helps you understand why something works, not dictate what you must do.
"Fun is not designed on paper, it's discovered through iteration."
"Players don't want your game. They want a solution to their imbalance."
"The best retention is letting players leave happy."
"Organic games feel like food. Synthetic games feel like drugs."
For deeper exploration, examine these specific topics from the knowledge base:
Credits: This skill synthesizes knowledge from the Indie Gamedev Knowledge Base by Dmitrii Zaitsev (Galaxy Burger creator), released under CC BY 4.0 license.
Remember: OGD is not about manipulation or dark patterns. It's about honest design that genuinely helps players regulate their state and return to balance.