メニュー
Turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue. Use when planning new features, designing architecture, or making significant changes to the codebase.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Persistent dietary safety layer for DoorDash CLI (dd-cli) ordering. Stores a personal/household dietary profile (allergens with severity tiers, diets, dislikes) that every cart is vetted against before checkout, with a deterministic tripwire — the vetting step saves the full cart contents to a vetted-cart dump, and a PreToolUse hook re-greps that dump against the anaphylaxis-severity allergen list before any checkout URL is allowed. Use when the user mentions allergies or dietary restrictions, when ordering food for someone with restrictions, or on every dd-cli cart flow while this skill is installed. A tripwire, not medical-grade — the human checkout page is the final check.
Group food ordering through the DoorDash CLI (dd-cli) from a persistent team roster. One request ("lunch for the team") fans out into a single merged cart with every line attributed to its eater via a person-to-cart-item-id ledger, per-person cost split with fee proration, payer rotation history, and a checkout gate that re-derives allergen conflicts against the roster live. Use when ordering for multiple people — team lunch, incident-response food, "collect orders from the thread" — or for /whose-turn payer rotation questions. Handles paste-a-thread intake: paste a Slack/chat thread and it builds the order ledger from it.
Accountability layer for agent-driven DoorDash ordering. Works with the doordash-audit-log hook (which appends every dd-cli invocation to an append-only audit log) and the /doordash-report command to answer "what has my AI been ordering and what did it cost" from data instead of memory. Use when the user asks about their DoorDash spending, ordering patterns, what the agent did in past sessions, or wants jq recipes for querying the audit log. Covers log schema, query patterns, rotation, and privacy guidance.
Named, context-bound saved DoorDash orders ("post-gym", "late-night deploy") recalled through the DoorDash CLI (dd-cli) with a mandatory cart-diff before any checkout link is handed over. Use when the user names a saved order ("order my post-gym bowl", "the usual", "my Friday ramen"), wants to save the order they just placed as a playbook, or asks to list/remove saved orders. Persists name→order-uuid playbooks across sessions, catches silent menu/price drift on every recall, and self-heals stale playbooks when a restaurant's menu changes. Requires dd-cli (macOS Apple Silicon, waitlist-gated).
Hard spending policy for agent-driven DoorDash ordering through the DoorDash CLI (dd-cli). Per-order ceiling, daily/weekly/monthly caps, cooldown between orders, and blocked hours — enforced deterministically by routing every cart-mutation and checkout through the dd-guard wrapper script, which prices the cart, checks the policy against a persistent spend ledger, and refuses out-of-policy checkouts with exit code 2. Use when the user wants budget limits on agent food ordering, asks "how much have I spent on DoorDash", wants to set spending caps, or whenever building carts / checking out with dd-cli while this skill is installed. Pairs with a PreToolUse hook that denies raw dd-cli checkout calls that bypass the wrapper.
Segment a SKU portfolio on value (ABC) and demand variability (XYZ), produce the 9-box with a planning policy per cell, and reallocate planner attention accordingly. Use when the user mentions ABC analysis, inventory segmentation, SKU rationalization, stok segmentasyonu, envanter sınıflandırma, or asks which items deserve forecasting effort. Differentiator - ABC alone is treated as half an answer; policy lives in the value x variability combination.
| name | feature-design-assistant |
| description | Turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue. Use when planning new features, designing architecture, or making significant changes to the codebase. |
Help turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through structured information gathering and collaborative validation.
Announce at start: "I'm using the feature-design-assistant skill to design this feature."
First, explore the codebase to understand:
Use AskUserQuestion to batch collect information efficiently. Each call can ask up to 4 questions.
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "What is the primary goal of this feature?",
"header": "Goal",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "New Functionality", "description": "Add entirely new capability to the system" },
{ "label": "Enhancement", "description": "Improve or extend existing feature" },
{ "label": "Bug Fix", "description": "Fix incorrect behavior or issue" },
{ "label": "Refactoring", "description": "Improve code quality without changing behavior" }
]
},
{
"question": "Who are the primary users of this feature?",
"header": "Users",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "End Users", "description": "External customers using the product" },
{ "label": "Admins", "description": "Internal administrators or operators" },
{ "label": "Developers", "description": "Other developers using APIs or SDKs" },
{ "label": "System", "description": "Automated processes or background jobs" }
]
},
{
"question": "What is the expected scope of this feature?",
"header": "Scope",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Small (1-2 days)", "description": "Single component, limited changes" },
{ "label": "Medium (3-5 days)", "description": "Multiple components, moderate complexity" },
{ "label": "Large (1-2 weeks)", "description": "Cross-cutting concerns, significant changes" },
{ "label": "Unsure", "description": "Need to explore further to estimate" }
]
},
{
"question": "Are there any hard deadlines or constraints?",
"header": "Timeline",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Urgent", "description": "Need this ASAP, within days" },
{ "label": "This Sprint", "description": "Should be done within current sprint" },
{ "label": "Flexible", "description": "No hard deadline, quality over speed" },
{ "label": "Planning Only", "description": "Just designing now, implementing later" }
]
}
]
}
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "Which layers of the system will this feature touch?",
"header": "Layers",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "Data Model", "description": "Database schema, models, migrations" },
{ "label": "Business Logic", "description": "Services, domain logic, rules" },
{ "label": "API", "description": "REST/GraphQL endpoints, contracts" },
{ "label": "UI", "description": "Frontend components, user interface" }
]
},
{
"question": "What are the key quality requirements?",
"header": "Quality",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "High Performance", "description": "Must handle high load or be very fast" },
{ "label": "Strong Security", "description": "Sensitive data, auth, access control" },
{ "label": "High Reliability", "description": "Cannot fail, needs redundancy" },
{ "label": "Easy Maintenance", "description": "Needs to be easily understood and modified" }
]
},
{
"question": "How should errors be handled?",
"header": "Errors",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Fail Fast", "description": "Stop immediately on any error" },
{ "label": "Graceful Degrade", "description": "Continue with reduced functionality" },
{ "label": "Retry & Recover", "description": "Automatic retry with recovery logic" },
{ "label": "Context Dependent", "description": "Different strategies for different cases" }
]
},
{
"question": "What testing approach is preferred?",
"header": "Testing",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "TDD (Recommended)", "description": "Write tests first, then implementation" },
{ "label": "Test After", "description": "Implement first, add tests after" },
{ "label": "Minimal Tests", "description": "Only critical path testing" },
{ "label": "No Tests", "description": "Skip testing for this feature" }
]
}
]
}
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "Does this feature need external integrations?",
"header": "Integrations",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "Database", "description": "New tables, queries, or migrations" },
{ "label": "External APIs", "description": "Third-party service calls" },
{ "label": "Message Queue", "description": "Async processing, events" },
{ "label": "None", "description": "No external integrations needed" }
]
},
{
"question": "Are there dependencies on other features or teams?",
"header": "Dependencies",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "Auth System", "description": "User authentication or authorization" },
{ "label": "Other Features", "description": "Depends on features being developed" },
{ "label": "External Team", "description": "Needs input from another team" },
{ "label": "None", "description": "Fully independent feature" }
]
},
{
"question": "How should we handle backwards compatibility?",
"header": "Compat",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Must Maintain", "description": "Cannot break existing clients" },
{ "label": "Version API", "description": "Create new version, deprecate old" },
{ "label": "Breaking OK", "description": "Can make breaking changes" },
{ "label": "Not Applicable", "description": "New feature, no existing users" }
]
},
{
"question": "What documentation is needed?",
"header": "Docs",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "API Docs", "description": "Endpoint documentation" },
{ "label": "User Guide", "description": "How-to for end users" },
{ "label": "Dev Guide", "description": "Technical implementation details" },
{ "label": "None", "description": "No documentation needed" }
]
}
]
}
Based on previous answers, ask follow-up questions. Examples:
If UI layer selected:
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "What UI framework/approach should we use?",
"header": "UI Tech",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "React", "description": "React components with hooks" },
{ "label": "Vue", "description": "Vue.js components" },
{ "label": "Server-Side", "description": "Server-rendered HTML templates" },
{ "label": "Existing Pattern", "description": "Follow current project conventions" }
]
}
]
}
If High Security selected:
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "What security measures are required?",
"header": "Security",
"multiSelect": true,
"options": [
{ "label": "Input Validation", "description": "Strict input sanitization" },
{ "label": "Rate Limiting", "description": "Prevent abuse and DoS" },
{ "label": "Audit Logging", "description": "Track all sensitive actions" },
{ "label": "Encryption", "description": "Encrypt data at rest/transit" }
]
}
]
}
After gathering requirements, propose 2-3 approaches:
## Approach Options
### Option A: [Name] (Recommended)
**Pros:** ...
**Cons:** ...
**Best for:** ...
### Option B: [Name]
**Pros:** ...
**Cons:** ...
**Best for:** ...
### Option C: [Name]
**Pros:** ...
**Cons:** ...
**Best for:** ...
Use AskUserQuestion to confirm approach:
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "Which approach would you like to proceed with?",
"header": "Approach",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Option A (Recommended)", "description": "Brief summary of approach A" },
{ "label": "Option B", "description": "Brief summary of approach B" },
{ "label": "Option C", "description": "Brief summary of approach C" }
]
}
]
}
Present design in sections (300-500 words each), validate after each:
After each section, use AskUserQuestion:
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "Does this section look correct?",
"header": "Review",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Looks Good", "description": "Continue to next section" },
{ "label": "Minor Changes", "description": "Small adjustments needed" },
{ "label": "Major Revision", "description": "Significant changes required" },
{ "label": "Questions", "description": "Need clarification before proceeding" }
]
}
]
}
Write to docs/designs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md:
# Feature: [Name]
## Summary
[Brief description]
## Requirements
[From Phase 2 answers]
## Architecture
[From Phase 4]
## Implementation Tasks
[Task checklist]
## Implementation Tasks
- [ ] **Task Title** `priority:1` `phase:model` `time:15min`
- files: src/file1.py, tests/test_file1.py
- [ ] Write failing test for X
- [ ] Run test, verify it fails
- [ ] Implement minimal code
- [ ] Run test, verify it passes
- [ ] Commit
- [ ] **Another Task** `priority:2` `phase:api` `deps:Task Title` `time:10min`
- files: src/api.py
- [ ] Write failing test
- [ ] Implement and verify
- [ ] Commit
{
"questions": [
{
"question": "How would you like to proceed with implementation?",
"header": "Next Step",
"multiSelect": false,
"options": [
{ "label": "Execute Now", "description": "Run /feature-pipeline in this session" },
{ "label": "New Session", "description": "Start fresh session for implementation" },
{ "label": "Later", "description": "Save design, implement manually later" },
{ "label": "Revise Design", "description": "Go back and modify the design" }
]
}
]
}