Skip to main content

code-review-checklist

Review code against a standard checklist covering security, correctness, performance, and readability. Use when asked to review code, check a PR, or audit changes.

ソース情報

リポジトリ
davila7/claude-with-skills
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年5月15日 01:57
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
13
フォーク
0

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
title
code-review-checklist
name
code-review-checklist
description
Review code against a standard checklist covering security, correctness, performance, and readability. Use when asked to review code, check a PR, or audit changes.
## Instructions Work through each category in the checklist below. For each item, either confirm it passes or flag the specific file and line number where the issue appears. ### 1. Security - Hardcoded secrets: check for API keys, passwords, tokens, or credentials embedded in the code - Input validation: confirm that inputs from external sources (user input, API responses, file contents) are validated before use - SQL injection: check that any database queries use parameterized statements or an ORM, never raw string concatenation with user input - Authentication and authorization: if the code touches access control, verify that checks happen server-side and cannot be bypassed by the caller ### 2. Correctness - Edge cases: null values, empty collections, zero, negative numbers, empty strings — does the code handle these? - Error paths: are errors caught at the right level? Are they handled or propagated with enough context to debug? - Off-by-one: check loop bounds and index arithmetic - Concurrency: if the code runs in a concurrent environment, check for shared mutable state without proper synchronization ### 3. Performance - N+1 queries: check for database queries inside loops - Unnecessary work: repeated computation of the same value, re-fetching data that was already fetched - Memory: large allocations inside tight loops, unbounded collections that grow with input size ### 4. Readability - Naming: variables, functions, and classes should communicate intent without needing a comment - Comments: comments should explain why, not what. Flag comments that describe what the code does (the code shows that already) and missing comments where the intent is non-obvious - Function length: flag functions that do more than one thing or that span more than roughly 40 lines without a clear reason - Magic numbers: unexplained numeric or string literals that should be named constants ### 5. Tests - Happy path coverage: does the test suite exercise the main success case? - Edge case coverage: are the edge cases identified in the Correctness section tested? - Test clarity: do test names describe the behavior being tested, not the implementation? - Mocks and stubs: are external dependencies properly isolated in unit tests? ## Output format Group findings by category. Under each category heading, list specific issues with file name and line number where applicable. If a category has no findings, write "No issues found." at the end of each category. If the code passes all checks, say so clearly after listing the categories.
GitHubで見る