Skip to main content

research

Deep research into technical solutions by searching the web, examining GitHub repos, and gathering evidence. Use when the user explicitly says "use the research skill", "use a research agent", or asks for deep/thorough research into implementation options or technologies.

インストールへ移動

ソース情報

リポジトリ
dwmkerr/claude-toolkit
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年2月25日 13:55
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
23
フォーク
2

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

ファイルエクスプローラー
2 ファイル

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
research
description
Deep research into technical solutions by searching the web, examining GitHub repos, and gathering evidence. Use when the user explicitly says "use the research skill", "use a research agent", or asks for deep/thorough research into implementation options or technologies.
# Research Research technical solutions and gather evidence before implementation. ## Research Process ### 1. Web Search First Always start with web search to find: - Official documentation - GitHub repositories - Blog posts and tutorials - Protocol specifications (PDFs, RFCs) ### 2. Examine GitHub Repositories GitHub raw content is often blocked. Clone repos to examine them: ```bash cd /tmp git clone https://github.com/owner/repo.git cat /tmp/repo/README.md ``` Look for: - README documentation - Code examples - Architecture patterns - Dependencies and requirements ### 3. Handle Blocked Content If a website cannot be loaded: - Ask the user to paste the relevant content - Request PDFs or specification documents - Ask for screenshots if visual content is needed Example prompt: > "I found a relevant resource at [URL] but cannot access it. Could you paste the key content or provide the PDF?" ### 4. Local Research Workspace Store findings in `./scratch/research/` for review: ```bash mkdir -p ./scratch/research ``` Save: - Cloned repo summaries - Code snippets - Architecture diagrams - Comparison notes ### 5. Evidence Requirements **Minimum 2-3 datapoints required** before recommending a solution: - GitHub repo with active maintenance - Documentation or specification - Real-world usage examples - Community feedback (issues, discussions) If insufficient evidence, ask for guidance: > "I found only one reference to this approach. Can you point me to additional resources or clarify the requirements?" ## Output Format Always back up findings with sources: ```markdown ## Research: [Topic] ### Option 1: [Solution Name] - **Source**: [URL or repo link] - **Pros**: ... - **Cons**: ... - **Evidence**: [What confirms this works] ### Option 2: [Solution Name] ... ### Recommendation Based on [N] sources, I recommend [Option] because... ### Sources - [Title](URL) - [Repo](GitHub URL) - cloned and examined - [Spec](URL) - user provided ``` ## Example Usage User: "Research options for terminal recording in an MCP server" 1. Web search: "terminal recording library node typescript" 2. Find GitHub repos -> clone to /tmp and examine 3. Find asciinema, VHS, xterm.js 4. Compare approaches in ./scratch/research/terminal-recording.md 5. Present options with 2-3 sources each
GitHubで見る