Skip to main content

code-prose

Apply Orwell's rules to the prose inside code — identifiers and comments — without changing behavior. Use when names, word choice, or comments need an editorial pass.

ソース情報

リポジトリ
EpicenterHQ/epicenter
ソースの最終更新活動
2026年8月28日 05:42
検出された SKILL.md の言語
英語
スター
4,817
フォーク
385

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

SKILL.md を表示中

SKILL.md
ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー
name
code-prose
description
Apply Orwell's rules to the prose inside code — identifiers and comments — without changing behavior. Use when names, word choice, or comments need an editorial pass.
Review changes in the current branch, or in the scope the user specifies. Apply these criteria without changing behavior. Only touch code in that scope, and run the relevant existing checks after changes. ## Word choice in code and comments Variable names, function names, and comments are all prose. Apply Orwell's rules ("Politics and the English Language") to each: > Never use a long word where a short one will do. > > If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out. > > Never use the passive where you can use the active. > > Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent. Latinate vocabulary (reconcile, coalesce, normalize, reconciliation) sounds technical and abstract; Anglo-Saxon words (prune, run, watch, stop, drop, walk) are short and physical. Prefer the Saxon word. ### Names 1. **One word per concept, one concept per word.** Keep a vocabulary. If `sync` names "pulling remote changes," it cannot also name "flushing edits to disk;" rename one of them. 2. **Cut words the context already carries.** A module named `workspaceWatcher` does not need `startNativeWorkspaceWatcher`; `watchWorkspace` says the same thing. 3. **A compound name is usually a hedge:** - ❌ `lastObservedDiskContent` is a specification to defend - ✅ `baseline` is a readable description ### Comments State, in plain English, the constraint the code cannot show: why the **non-obvious** exists. - ✅ If code is complex and the implementation is non-obvious, add a comment. - ✅ If a function contains complex behaviors or side effects, add a doc comment. - 🗑️ If a comment narrates change history from the conversation, delete it. - 🗑️ If a comment restates code whose behavior is self-evident, delete it. ## Overfitting Code must stand on its own. If a name or comment only makes sense to someone who watched it happen (this conversation, this PR), it is overfitted. Write for the reader who arrives with no history: rewrite it against the codebase's own vocabulary. For the structural half of the same discipline — file shape, derivable state, and compatibility with code that never shipped — use [refactoring](../refactoring/SKILL.md).
GitHubで見る