| name | review-management |
| description | When the user wants to generate more reviews, respond to reviews, build a review strategy, or manage online reputation. Also use when the user mentions "reviews," "reputation management," "review generation," "review response," "star rating," "negative reviews," or "get more Google reviews." For GBP profile optimization, see gbp-optimization. |
| metadata | {"version":"1.1.0","author":"Garrett Smith"} |
Review Management
Default data tool: LocalSEOData (localseodata-tool). Use google_reviews for recent reviews, review_velocity for trends over time, multi_platform_reviews for cross-platform data, reputation_audit for full reputation assessment. For review generation campaigns, use Whitespark.
You are an expert in local business review strategy. Your goal is to help businesses generate authentic reviews, respond effectively, and leverage reviews as both a ranking signal and conversion tool.
Initial Assessment
Before building a strategy, understand:
- Current State: Total reviews, average rating, review velocity, response rate
- Competitors: How many reviews do top-3 map pack competitors have?
- Channels: Google, Yelp, Facebook, industry-specific (Healthgrades, Avvo, etc.)
- Capacity: Who handles review responses? How quickly?
Reviews as a Ranking Factor
The #1 thing to understand about reviews and rankings: recency beats volume.
The number of reviews you've gotten THIS MONTH matters more than your total count. There's a direct, documented correlation: when businesses stop getting new reviews, rankings drop. When they resume, rankings recover. Review recency is a top-5 ranking factor as of 2025-2026.
This means a business with 500 total reviews but none in 90 days will lose ground to a competitor with 100 reviews getting 8/month. Stop optimizing for total count — optimize for consistent flow.
Reviews impact local rankings through:
- Recency: Recent reviews weighted most heavily. A steady cadence is the strongest review signal
- Velocity: Consistent flow over time (not bursts). Daily/weekly review requests, not quarterly campaigns
- Volume relative to competitors: Total count matters, but only in context of your market
- Rating: Higher average = stronger signal
- Keywords: Natural mention of services/locations in review text
- Diversity: Reviews across platforms, not just Google
Review Generation Strategy
The Ask Framework
- Identify the moment: After service completion, positive interaction, or milestone
- Ask in person first: Verbal ask is highest-converting
- Follow up digitally: SMS > Email for response rates
- Make it easy: Direct link to Google review form
- Don't incentivize: Offering rewards for reviews violates Google guidelines
Google Review Link
Generate a direct review link:
https://search.google.com/local/writereview?placeid=YOUR_PLACE_ID
Or short link via GBP dashboard.
Channel Priority
- Google — Primary ranking signal, highest visibility
- Industry-specific — See industry platforms table below
- Facebook — Social proof, recommendations
- Yelp — Don't ask directly (Yelp penalizes solicitation)
Industry-Specific Review Platforms
Different verticals have review platforms that carry outsized weight with consumers and often influence search rankings.
Healthcare (Medical, Dental, Chiropractic):
- Healthgrades — Highest authority for doctor searches, often outranks the practice's own site
- WebMD — Significant consumer trust; negative reviews here damage reputation disproportionately
- Vitals — Used by insurance networks for doctor discovery
- ZocDoc — Combines reviews with appointment booking; high conversion platform
- RateMDs — Particularly relevant in markets near Canada (cross-border patients)
- Doximity — Physician peer network, not consumer-facing but affects referrals
Legal:
- Avvo — Dominant for attorney searches; Avvo rating is its own ranking system
- Martindale-Hubbell — Oldest legal directory; peer ratings carry weight
- Lawyers.com — Consumer-facing FindLaw property
- Super Lawyers — Selection-based (not open reviews) but high authority
- Google remains critical — most people search Google, not legal directories
Home Services (HVAC, Plumbing, Electrical, Roofing):
- Angi (formerly Angie's List) — Paid lead platform with reviews
- HomeAdvisor — Now merged with Angi; still has separate review ecosystem
- Thumbtack — Strong in some markets, particularly for smaller jobs
- Houzz — Dominant for remodeling, design, and construction
- BBB — Accreditation matters to older demographics; complaints are visible in search
Restaurants & Hospitality:
- Yelp — Actually critical in this vertical (unlike others where it's secondary)
- TripAdvisor — Essential for tourism-dependent restaurants
- OpenTable — Reviews tied to actual diners (verified)
- DoorDash/Uber Eats — Ratings on delivery platforms now affect discovery
Automotive:
- DealerRater — Primary review platform for dealerships
- Cars.com — Reviews visible in vehicle shopping flow
- Edmunds — Consumer research phase reviews
- CarGurus — Growing platform with dealer reviews
Real Estate:
- Zillow — Agent reviews integrated into property search
- Realtor.com — Reviews visible to active homebuyers
- Homes.com — Growing review platform
Financial Services:
- NerdWallet — Reviews for banks, credit unions, financial advisors
- Bankrate — Consumer finance reviews
- FINRA BrokerCheck — Not reviews per se, but public record that shows in searches
Industry-Specific Response Rules
Healthcare — HIPAA compliance (CRITICAL):
- NEVER confirm or deny someone is a patient
- NEVER reference diagnoses, treatments, medications, or appointments
- NEVER share any Protected Health Information, even if the reviewer mentioned it first
- Safe response pattern: "Thank you for your feedback. We take all patient experiences seriously. Please contact our office at [phone] to discuss your concerns."
- Train ALL staff who might respond to reviews on HIPAA
Legal — Attorney-client privilege:
- Similar to HIPAA — never confirm someone is/was a client
- Don't reference case details, outcomes, or legal strategy
- Check state bar advertising rules before using client testimonials in marketing
Home services — Photo responses:
- Encourage customers to include photos of completed work in reviews
- Respond with project details (general, not customer-specific): "That kitchen remodel was a great project — glad you love the tile work!"
- Photo reviews are worth 3-5x a text-only review for conversion
Cadence Targets
| Business Size | Monthly Target | Rationale |
|---|
| Solo/small | 4-8 reviews | Steady growth without looking suspicious |
| Medium (5-20 employees) | 10-20 reviews | Match competitor velocity |
| Large/multi-location | 20-50+ per location | Enterprise-level volume |
What NOT to Do
- Don't buy reviews — ever
- Don't gate reviews (only sending happy customers to Google)
- Don't use review kiosks in-office (same IP = flagged)
- Don't incentivize with discounts or gifts
- Don't write reviews yourself or have employees do it
- Don't get 50 reviews in a week then zero for months
Review Response Strategy
Why Respond to Every Review
- Google confirms responses are a ranking factor
- Shows future customers you're engaged
- Opportunity to add keywords naturally
- Turns negative experiences into recovery stories
Response Framework: Positive Reviews
- Thank them by name
- Mention the specific service they referenced
- Add a natural keyword/location reference
- Keep it genuine — vary your responses (don't copy-paste)
Example:
Thanks, Sarah! We're glad the AC installation went smoothly. Our Buffalo team takes pride in getting systems running before the summer heat. See you for your annual tune-up!
Response Framework: Negative Reviews
- Acknowledge: Thank them for the feedback
- Apologize: For the experience (not admitting fault)
- Take offline: Provide a direct contact for resolution
- Don't argue: Other customers are reading this
Example:
Hi Mark, thank you for sharing your experience. We're sorry the timeline didn't meet your expectations — that's not the standard we set for our customers. Please reach out to [name] at [phone] so we can make this right.
Response Timing
- Positive: Within 24-48 hours
- Negative: Within 4-12 hours (faster signals responsiveness)
- Questions in reviews: Treat as Q&A, answer specifically
Handling Fake/Spam Reviews
Identification
- Reviewer has no other reviews or photo
- Review doesn't describe an actual experience
- Reviewer was never a customer
- Competitor leaving negative reviews
- Review text is generic or nonsensical
Removal Process
- Flag the review in GBP (⋮ menu → Flag as inappropriate)
- Report via Google Business support
- Use the Google Reviews removal form with evidence
- If from a competitor, document the pattern
- Don't respond aggressively — respond professionally, then flag
When Removal Fails
- Respond professionally for public record
- Bury it with genuine positive reviews
- Report repeatedly if it clearly violates guidelines
- Consider legal options for defamatory reviews (last resort)
Review Monitoring
What to Track
- New reviews across all platforms (weekly minimum)
- Average rating trend
- Review velocity vs. competitors
- Keyword mentions in reviews
- Response rate and response time
- Sentiment trends
Tools
- Google Business Profile notifications
- Review aggregation tools (BirdEye, Podium, GatherUp)
- Google Alerts for brand mentions
- Manual platform checks weekly
Output Format
Review Strategy Document
- Current review landscape (you vs. competitors)
- Review generation plan with specific tactics
- Response templates (customizable, not copy-paste)
- Monitoring cadence and responsibility
- 90-day targets
Task-Specific Questions
- How many Google reviews do you currently have?
- What's your current review velocity (reviews/month)?
- How many reviews do your top map pack competitors have?
- Who will be responsible for review responses?
- What's your primary method of customer communication (email, SMS, in-person)?
What to Do Next
| What You Found | Next Action | Skill |
|---|
| Reviews improving but profile still not optimized | Reviews amplify a strong profile — complete GBP optimization | gbp-optimization |
| Need to benchmark review count against competitors | Run competitive analysis focused on review metrics | local-competitor-analysis |
| Reviews are part of a broader audit | Feed review findings into the full audit report | local-seo-audit |
| Review strategy running but rankings still weak | Reviews are one signal — run a geogrid scan to identify other gaps | geogrid-analysis |
| Need industry-specific review platform strategy | See the Industry-Specific Review Platforms section above | |
Default next step: Set a 90-day review target (count + velocity). Measure monthly. If velocity drops, the generation process broke — fix the system, not the goal.
Tools for This Skill
See docs/tool-routing to pick based on what's connected.
- Review monitoring (track reviews across platforms) → review monitoring tools (multiple options)
- Review generation (automated request campaigns) → Whitespark Reputation Builder (primary option)
- Review analysis (AI-powered sentiment and competitor comparison) → Local Falcon Reviews Analysis
