メニュー
Japan APPI expert for the Act on the Protection of Personal Information. Reference-depth framework plugin with scope determination, evidence checklist, and SCF-backed assessment guidance for Japanese personal data.
Codex または Claude でインストール この Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。
SOC 職業分類に基づく
Build and deploy a production-ready Trust Center for any company. Use this skill whenever someone asks to create a trust center, compliance portal, security page, or wants to publish their SOC 2/SOC 3/ISO 27001/HIPAA/compliance posture publicly. Also triggers when someone mentions gated document access for audit reports, NDA-based document sharing, or wants to replace paid trust center tools like Secureframe, Vanta, Drata, or SafeBase. Even if they just say "I need a place to share my SOC 2 with customers" — that's a trust center. Use this skill.
NIST Cybersecurity Framework v2.0 expert. Reference-depth knowledge of the six Functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover), Categories and Subcategories, Profiles (Current vs Target), Tiers, Implementation Examples, and the practitioner workflow of using CSF as a board-readable cybersecurity outcomes language. Backed by the SCF crosswalk for control-by-control mechanics.
Verbatim reference for all 320 NIST 800-171A Rev 2 assessment objectives, plus the Rev 2 → Rev 3 control crosswalk. Use for AO-level lookups (e.g., 3.1.1[c]), evidence planning, and forward-mapping to Rev 3. Pairs with cmmc-expert.
CMMC v2.0 expert for DoD contractors. Covers NIST 800-171 Rev 2 (14 families, 110 controls), SPRS scoring, POA&M rules, 32 CFR Part 170, DFARS clauses, scoping, ESP/CSP, C3PAO assessment lifecycle, and Rev 2 → Rev 3 transition.
Interpret testssl-inspector normalized findings, recommend remediations, and tie evidence back to SCF anchor controls plus SOC 2 / NIST 800-53 r5 / PCI DSS 4.0.1 / ISO 27002:2022 equivalents derived from SCF crosswalks.
Scaffolds a complete React/Vite website project from site-config.json. Generates components, styles, and configuration based on the site type and plan data.
| name | jp-appi-expert |
| description | Japan APPI expert for the Act on the Protection of Personal Information. Reference-depth framework plugin with scope determination, evidence checklist, and SCF-backed assessment guidance for Japanese personal data. |
| allowed-tools | Read, Glob, Grep, Write |
Reference-depth expertise for Japan's Act on the Protection of Personal Information (APPI), represented in SCF as apac-jpn-ppi-2020. This plugin bundles the SCF crosswalk (58 SCF controls -> 134 framework controls) with APPI-specific assessment context.
apac-jpn-ppi-2020APPI is Japan's national privacy law for organizations that handle personal information and retained personal data. It focuses on purpose specification, fair collection and use, security safeguards, third-party disclosure, cross-border transfer, breach response, and individual rights. For GRC work, treat APPI as both a privacy governance framework and an operational evidence framework: the assessor needs to see where Japanese personal data is collected, how it is used, who receives it, how incidents are escalated, and whether transfer and consent records match actual system flows.
APPI applies to business operators handling personal information in Japan and can reach foreign operators that provide goods or services to individuals in Japan and handle their personal information. Scope analysis should identify whether the organization is a personal information handling business operator, whether it handles retained personal data, and whether it transfers personal data to third parties or recipients outside Japan. Do not assume APPI is only for Japan-incorporated entities; customer location, service targeting, and Japan data flows matter.
Evidence usually centers on documented purposes of use, privacy notices, consent and opt-out records, third-party transfer records, cross-border transfer disclosures, processor or entrustee management, security-control policies, breach response procedures, and data subject request handling records. APPI does not mirror GDPR's Article 30 ROPA or DPIA terminology, but mature programs should maintain equivalent data inventories, transfer registers, incident logs, and vendor oversight files so APPI obligations can be demonstrated.
There is no SOC-style annual certification cycle in APPI. Assess recurring operating evidence on a risk-based cadence: access reviews, vendor reviews, privacy notice updates, transfer records, consent changes, and breach exercises should be refreshed when systems or purposes change and at least during annual privacy governance review. Breach reporting under the amended APPI is mandatory for specified incident categories; teams should preserve both the initial triage timeline and final report package to the PPC, plus affected-individual notification analysis.
The Personal Information Protection Commission (PPC) is Japan's data protection regulator. PPC oversight can involve guidance, recommendations, orders, reporting demands, and administrative or criminal consequences for serious non-compliance. In assessment output, separate legal penalty analysis from technical control evidence: this plugin should identify likely gaps and evidence needs, not provide a penalty calculation.
APPI commonly overlaps with GDPR for EU-Japan transfers, especially because Japan has an EU adequacy decision with supplementary rules. It also overlaps with ISO 27001/27002, SOC 2 privacy/security criteria, NIST privacy and security controls, and sectoral Japanese obligations for finance, healthcare, telecom, and government suppliers. Use the SCF crosswalk for control mechanics, but keep APPI-specific reporting focused on Japanese personal-data purpose, disclosure, transfer, and breach obligations.
/jp-appi:scope - determine applicability/jp-appi:assess - run a gap assessment/jp-appi:evidence-checklist - enumerate evidence requirementsAll three delegate to /grc-engineer:gap-assessment with SCF framework ID apac-jpn-ppi-2020 for the control-by-control mechanics, and wrap the results in APPI-specific terminology.
Full-depth plugins add framework-specific workflow commands tied to the audit ritual. Candidates for this framework:
/jp-appi:breach-triage - classify whether an incident likely triggers PPC reporting and affected-person notification./jp-appi:cross-border-transfer-check - review recipient country, consent/disclosure basis, equivalent-measures monitoring, and onward-transfer records./jp-appi:purpose-use-register - build or review the purpose-of-use inventory for Japanese personal data./jp-appi:entrustee-review - assess outsourced processing, sub-entrustee controls, and supervision evidence.