analyze-campaign-roi

Evaluate marketing campaign performance across channels using multi-touch attribution, funnel analysis, and ROI benchmarking. Combines hard metrics with qualitative context from team meetings to explain why campaigns over- or underperform. Trigger on: campaign performance, marketing ROI, ROAS, attribution model, funnel analysis, campaign metrics, channel performance, marketing analytics, campaign review, CPA analysis.

インストールへ移動

リポジトリ: heyharmony/skills
ソースの最終更新活動: 2026年4月2日 20:15
検出された SKILL.md の言語: 英語
スター: 1
フォーク: 0

インストール方法

デフォルトでは、最初にソースを確認する Prompt が選択されています。直接コマンドに切り替えるか、ローカルコピーをダウンロードすることもできます。

Codex または Claude でインストールこの Prompt をコピーして Codex、Claude、または他のアシスタントに貼り付けると、Skill ページを確認してインストールできます。

直接コマンドでは確認用 Prompt が省略されます。実行前にソースを確認してください。

npx skills add https://github.com/heyharmony/skills --skill analyze-campaign-roi

コマンドは1行のまま表示されます。コピー前に横へスクロールして全体を確認してください。

ローカルで確認しますか？SkillsMP が現在取得できるファイルをダウンロードできます。

ソースファイルを確認

インストールを決める前に、SKILL.md と SkillsMP に表示されている付属ファイルをお読みください。

ファイルエクスプローラー

2 ファイル

SKILL.md

ソースの指示 · 読み取り専用プレビュー

検索に戻るインストールに戻る

extract-action-items

Extract every action item from your last meeting — who owns it, what's the deadline, and what's the context. Trigger on: action items, what came out of the meeting, meeting actions, follow-ups from the call, what did we agree to do, meeting takeaways, tasks from the meeting, who's doing what, meeting outcomes.

2026-04-02

generate-ad-creative

Create and optimize ad copy across platforms using conversation insights, performance data, and platform specifications

2026-04-02

ai-seo

Audit and optimize content for AI search visibility across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, Claude, and Gemini. Analyze extractability, authority signals, and citation opportunities to maximize zero-click AI search presence.

2026-04-02

このリポジトリのすべてを見る

name	Analyze Campaign ROI
description	Evaluate marketing campaign performance across channels using multi-touch attribution, funnel analysis, and ROI benchmarking. Combines hard metrics with qualitative context from team meetings to explain why campaigns over- or underperform. Trigger on: campaign performance, marketing ROI, ROAS, attribution model, funnel analysis, campaign metrics, channel performance, marketing analytics, campaign review, CPA analysis.
dependencies	[]
role	Marketing
action	Analyze
connectors	["HubSpot","Google Drive","Salesforce","Slack","Notion"]
author	Harmony
version	1.0.0
icon	sparkles
cover
screenshots	[]
category	Marketing

Purpose

Marketing teams review dashboards and pull reports, but the real story lives in weekly syncs, QBRs, and cross-functional meetings. A campaign might show 2% ROI on paper, but the team discussed in Tuesday's sync that targeting was misconfigured for two weeks—or that a new creative resonated better than expected. This skill bridges the gap between hard metrics and human context. By combining campaign data (spend, conversions, attribution) with qualitative insights from Harmony conversations, it produces analysis that explains why campaigns over- or underperform, not just what the numbers show.

When to Use

Monthly or quarterly campaign reviews – Assess performance across channels and justify budget decisions with data plus context
Budget reallocation decisions – Determine which channels deserve more investment based on ROI, attribution, and team feedback
New channel evaluation – Understand if a freshly launched channel (e.g., TikTok, Bluesky) is working and at what cost
Post-campaign debrief – After a major campaign ends, analyze what worked, what didn't, and why (using meeting notes as evidence)
Executive reporting on marketing spend – Present board-ready analysis that ties campaign metrics to business outcomes
Diagnosing underperforming channels – Use funnel analysis and team context to pinpoint where a channel is breaking down

Instructions

Gather campaign data. Collect spend, impressions, clicks, conversions, and revenue for each channel and campaign during the period in question. Pull from HubSpot, Google Ads, Meta Ads, Salesforce, or your data warehouse. Include timestamps so you can map spend to outcomes by date.
Mine meeting transcripts for qualitative context. Search Harmony for discussions about each channel's performance. Look for mentions of: targeting changes, creative pivots, market shifts (seasonal, competitive), technical issues (platform outages, pixel misconfiguration), team sentiment ("we love LinkedIn," "Facebook is broken"), and any external events that might explain variance.
Calculate core metrics per channel:
- ROI = (Revenue - Spend) / Spend × 100
- ROAS = Revenue / Ad Spend
- CPA = Spend / Conversions
- CAC = Spend / New Customers
- CTR = Clicks / Impressions × 100
- CVR = Conversions / Clicks × 100

# Campaign ROI Analysis: [Campaign Name or Period] ## Executive Summary [2–3 sentences: top insight, recommended action, confidence level] ## Channel Performance Table | Channel | Spend | Conversions | Revenue | ROI | ROAS | CPA | CTR | CVR | Benchmark | Status | |---------|-------|-------------|---------|-----|------|-----|-----|-----|-----------|--------| | Paid Search | $X | N | $R | X% | X:1 | $X | X% | X% | 3:1 ROAS | 🟢 | | Paid Social | $X | N | $R | X% | X:1 | $X | X% | X% | 2:1 ROAS | 🔴 | | Email | $X | N | $R | X% | X:1 | $X | X% | X% | 4:1 ROAS | 🟢 | | Organic | $X | N | $R | – | – | – | X% | X% | – | 🟡 | ## Attribution Breakdown [State which model you applied and why. Show contribution % per channel under that model.] ### First-Touch Attribution | Channel | Contribution % | Rationale | |---------|---|---| | Paid Social | 45% | Drives initial awareness | | Organic | 30% | Brand searches, discovery | | Email | 25% | Reactivation | ## Funnel Analysis [Channel-by-channel drop-off from awareness to decision/purchase] | Stage | Paid Search | Paid Social | Email | Organic | |-------|---|---|---|---| | Awareness (Impressions) | 50K | 80K | – | 25K | | Interest (Clicks) | 2.5K (5% CTR) | 1.6K (2% CTR) | 600 | 1.2K (4.8% CTR) | | Decision (Conversions) | 150 (6% CVR) | 80 (5% CVR) | 84 (14% CVR) | 60 (5% CVR) | | Revenue | $45K | $24K | $25.2K | $18K | ## Anomaly Explanations [For any metric that deviates from benchmark or expected pattern, explain using team context] **Email CVR is 14% (benchmark 4–8%)** - Team noted in March 15 sync that a new subject line test ("Exclusive: 30% off") had 2.3x engagement - Copy redesign in March 1 sync highlighted by Head of Marketing as "highest creative quality to date" - **Confidence: High** – Multiple team validations, consistent lift **Paid Social underperforming (1.5:1 ROAS vs 2:1 benchmark)** - Team mentioned in Feb 28 sync: "Facebook/Instagram pixel broke for 3 days (Feb 24–26)" - Targeting shifted March 1 to more aggressive lookalike audiences; early data shows promise - **Confidence: Medium** – Clear technical cause identified; corrective action underway; needs 2 more weeks of data ## Budget Recommendations | Channel | Current Spend | Recommended Spend | Change | Rationale | Confidence | |---------|---|---|---|---|---| | Paid Search | $30K | $40K | +33% | 4.2:1 ROAS, above benchmark; team sees scaling opportunity | High | | Email | $5K | $8K | +60% | 5:1 ROAS, strongest performer; list growing, engagement high | High | | Paid Social | $25K | $20K | -20% | Below benchmark; technical issues resolved; reassess in 30 days before reinvest | Medium | | Organic | $0 | $0 | – | Baseline; no paid spend; consider investing in SEO | – | **Total Q2 Marketing Budget:** $73K (current) → $68K (recommended) | Net impact: Reallocate underperforming spend to proven channels

# Campaign ROI Analysis: Q1 2026 – Clearpath Analytics ## Executive Summary Q1 generated $412K revenue on $73K spend (5.6:1 ROAS). Paid Search dominates with 4.2:1 ROI and strong team confidence. Paid Social underperformed due to pixel misconfiguration (Feb 24–26), now fixed. Recommend increasing Paid Search budget by $15K and Email by $3K; pause Paid Social spend pending April reassessment. ## Channel Performance Table | Channel | Spend | Conversions | Revenue | ROI | ROAS | CPA | CTR | CVR | Benchmark (B2B SaaS) | Status | |---------|-------|-------------|---------|-----|------|-----|-----|-----|---|---| | Paid Search | $32K | 128 | $152K | 375% | 4.75:1 | $250 | 4.2% | 6.5% | 3:1 ROAS | 🟢 | | Paid Social | $28K | 80 | $84K | 200% | 3:1 | $350 | 2.1% | 4.8% | 3:1 ROAS | 🟡 | | Email | $8K | 96 | $144K | 1700% | 18:1 | $83 | – | 12% | 4:1 ROAS | 🟢 | | Organic | $5K | 45 | $32K | 540% | 6.4:1 | $111 | 3.8% | 5.2% | – | 🟢 | ## Attribution Breakdown **Model Applied: Time-Decay (40-20-40)** Rationale: Clearpath Analytics operates in mid-market B2B with 45-day average sales cycle. Earlier touchpoints (brand discovery, problem awareness) and later touchpoints (solution validation, buying committee decision) both matter. Linear would underweight the critical discovery phase; last-touch would ignore the work of top-funnel channels. ### Time-Decay Contribution by Channel | Channel | Contribution % | Details | |---------|---|---| | Paid Search | 42% | Strong at decision stage; captures "data platform" intent searches | | Email | 28% | Effective nurture; reactivates MQLs, moves to SQL | | Paid Social | 18% | Awareness and consideration; LinkedIn drives CFO and VP-level reach | | Organic | 12% | Long-tail discovery; reduces dependency on paid | ## Funnel Analysis | Stage | Paid Search | Paid Social | Email | Organic | Total | |-------|---|---|---|---|---| | Awareness (Impressions) | 760K | 1.33M | – | 120K | 2.21M | | Interest (Clicks) | 32K (4.2%) | 28K (2.1%) | 800 | 4.6K (3.8%) | 65.4K | | Consideration (Form fills) | 1.96K (6.1%) | 1.4K (5%) | 560 (70%) | 380 (8.3%) | 4.3K | | Decision (Qualified opps) | 640 (32.7%) | 280 (20%) | 380 (67.9%) | 160 (42%) | 1.46K | | Purchase (Won deals) | 128 (20%) | 80 (28.6%) | 96 (25%) | 45 (28%) | 349 | **Key Insight:** Email's 70% form-fill rate is exceptional—higher than all paid channels. This suggests strong list quality and messaging alignment. Paid Social's consideration drop (1.4K clicks → 280 opps) suggests targeting or creative misalignment; needs immediate review. ## Anomaly Explanations **Paid Social underperforming (3:1 ROAS vs 4.2:1 Paid Search)** Technical Root Cause: - VP of Demand Gen noted in Feb 28 all-hands: "Facebook/Instagram conversion pixel broke Feb 24–26 due to iOS 17 update" - Lost 3 days of tracking; actual conversions likely higher but underreported - Pixel re-verified and reconfigured March 1 Team Confidence in Recovery: - March 5 weekly sync: Head of Marketing observed "LinkedIn audience expansion working; new VP-level targeting showing promise" - March 12 sync: Team reported "early April data shows CTR improvement to 2.8%, approaching 3%" **Confidence: Medium** — Clear technical cause identified and resolved. Recommend 30-day reassessment before reinvestment decision. --- **Email dominates (18:1 ROAS, 12% CVR)** Qualitative Context: - Head of Product Marketing mentioned in March 1 sync: "January redesign finally shipped; email quality jumped. Copy now references customer pain points, not just features." - Demand Gen lead shared in March 8 sync: "Segmentation by company size (SMB vs Enterprise) is now live; messaging matches buyer journey stage." Data Corroboration: - Jan ROAS: 8:1 (baseline) - Feb ROAS: 12:1 (redesign begins) - Mar ROAS: 18:1 (segmentation + new copy live) **Confidence: High** — Strong ROI supported by multiple team observations and consistent uptrend. Recommend increasing Email budget. --- **Organic exceeds benchmark (6.4:1 ROAS)** Context from Feb 15 sync: - SEO lead noted: "New blog on 'How to Choose a Data Platform' ranked #2 for target keyword; organic search traffic to top-level domain +45% MoM" - Minimal paid spend ($5K) means organic is low-cost baseline; high ROAS is partly due to low denominator **Confidence: High for organic quality; Medium for scaling opportunity** — Organic is reliable but would require Content + SEO investment to grow meaningfully. Not included in immediate budget reallocation. ## Budget Recommendations | Channel | Q1 Spend | Q2 Recommended | Change | Rationale | Confidence | |---------|---|---|---|---|---| | Paid Search | $32K | $47K | +47% ($15K) | 4.75:1 ROAS well above 3:1 benchmark; team confident in scaling; keyword roadmap ready | High | | Email | $8K | $11K | +38% ($3K) | 18:1 ROAS; exceptional CVR; list growing 8% MoM; segmentation working | High | | Paid Social | $28K | $15K | -46% ($13K) | Pause scale until April data confirms recovery post-pixel fix; reallocate to Paid Search/Email | Medium | | Organic | $5K | $6K | +20% ($1K) | Baseline monitoring; increase blog budget slightly if SEO hiring approved | Low | **Total Q2 Marketing Budget:** $73K → $79K (net +$6K; offset by Paid Social pause). Return reallocated Paid Social budget when April CTR/CVR metrics confirm recovery above 3:1 benchmark. ## Next Steps 1. Monitor Paid Social daily Apr 1–14; confirm CTR ≥ 2.8%, CVR ≥ 5% 2. Scale Paid Search by $5K week-over-week if ROAS ≥ 4:1 3. A/B test Email subject lines (current champion: "Exclusive: 30% off") 4. Schedule post-mortem on Paid Social pixel issue; preventive measures for future platform updates

analyze-campaign-roi

インストール方法

ソースファイルを確認

Purpose

When to Use

Instructions

Purpose

When to Use

Instructions

Output Format

Example: Clearpath Analytics Campaign Review

Edge Cases

analyze-campaign-roi

ソース情報

インストール方法

ソースファイルを確認

このリポジトリの他の Skills

Purpose

When to Use

Instructions

このリポジトリの他の Skills

Purpose

When to Use

Instructions

Output Format

Example: Clearpath Analytics Campaign Review

Edge Cases