| name | devotg-temporal-graph-connectomics |
| description | DevoTG: Temporal Graph Neural Networks for modeling C. elegans developmental connectomics, capturing dynamic wiring through continuous-time and discrete-time dynamic graphs. |
| activation | developmental connectomics, temporal graph neural networks, C. elegans, connectome development, wiring dynamics |
| tags | ["neuroscience","graph-neural-networks","temporal-networks","developmental-biology"] |
| arxiv_id | 2606.21940 |
| authors | ["Jayadratha Gayen","Bradly Alicea"] |
DevoTG: Temporal Graph Neural Networks for Developmental Connectomics
Problem
Understanding how a nervous system wires itself from birth to adulthood is fundamental in developmental neuroscience. Static graph models cannot capture the temporal dynamics of neural development.
Core Methodology
Dual Graph Representations
-
Continuous-Time Dynamic Graph (CTDG): Models cell division events from cell lineage data
- Each division is a temporal event
- Captures neurogenesis timing and cell fate decisions
-
Discrete-Time Dynamic Graph (DTDG): Models developing synaptic connectome
- Spanning 8 reconstructed electron-microscopy datasets
- Tracks 225 neurons and 858 to 2,496 connections over development
Temporal Graph Neural Network (TGN)
- Temporal memory: Maintains hidden state that evolves with graph events
- Node embeddings: Updated based on temporal neighborhood aggregation
- Link prediction: Predicts future connections based on historical dynamics
Key Results
- Lineage prediction: Mean test AUC = 0.839 ± 0.007 (5 seeds)
- Temporal advantage: Outperforms static GNN by 26 AUC points (0.577 ± 0.080)
- Connection stability classes: Identifies three classes (stable, developmental, variable)
Activation Triggers
- "developmental connectomics"
- "temporal graph neural networks"
- "C. elegans neural development"
- "wiring dynamics"
- "cell lineage prediction"
- "connectome over time"
Methodological Innovation
- Demonstrates that temporal memory is decisive for developmental prediction
- Bridges cell lineage and synaptic connectome development
- Identifies connection stability classes across development
Comparison with Static Methods
- Static GNN: 0.577 AUC (fails to capture temporal dynamics)
- Temporal GNN: 0.839 AUC (45% improvement)
- Temporal information is critical for developmental processes
Related Work
- Static Graph Neural Networks (GCN, GAT)
- Temporal Graph Networks (TGN)
- Neural development models
- C. elegans connectomics
Use Cases
- Developmental neuroscience
- Neurogenesis modeling
- Critical period identification
- Evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo)
Reference
Gayen, J., & Alicea, B. (2026). DevoTG: Temporal Graph Neural Networks for Modeling C. elegans Developmental Connectomics. arXiv:2606.21940